Of course, and as I said, I am assuming this ruling for Ingle Farm is related to their official club social media accounts, not private individuals.
Actually, this ruling is for all clubs on any social media platforms, like this one for instance.
Including Mitchell Park 8)
Geddit? ;) Oh for goodness sake. I can't believe this is even an argument or that people are trying to defend it.
The SAAFL cannot punish a club for the content of an individual's social media. It's that simple.
Just like my employer and football club has no responsibility if I get a speeding fine, or punch someone, or break any other number of innumerate policies, rules and laws in my own time - UNLESS I am acting on behalf of my employer or organisation.
Think about it for second - they're effectively saying the Football Club is responsible for their players private lives, at all times, under all circumstances.
What they should have said:
1. Any registered Ingle Farm player which brings the SAAFL into disrepute by posting on Social Media will be deregistered by the Executive Committee at their discretion.
2. Any Social Media content which is administered by the club that brings the SAAFL into disrepute will result in a loss of points for all teams.
Anyway. back to footy. As clearly that's more interesting.
There are a lot of (older) league officials across a number of leagues in SA who have a very negative opinion of this site. I have heard a number openly declare their disgust that their decisions are questioned on the various forums here.
They do not realise the gift they have been given in this era. All the heresay and rumour that used to be discussed and spread at the bar, or workplaces is now communicated here, and often corrected promptly. The officials have a method to monitor what is being said, what is the perception out in the community, and act or respond accordingly.
Instead it (social media) is being viewed as an evil that must be restrained.