It's more than a little funny that their season is over before their reserves even take the field.

Sack sando. FFS

So leaving after missing a couple of games wouldn't reflect on him at all?

To me, that would say "shit attitude".

Perhaps the show could reach out to its market and read the feedback here?

And now it's empty.

heater31 wrote:

cennals05 wrote:

Dogwatcher wrote:

cennals05 wrote: Then said the game is the another word for a homosexual v the team that voted NO.

Huh?

I'm not sure I can say what he actually said without getting banned.

Stay classy Centrals management

Yes, I wish we were more like your club with all those principles and standards.

Yeah, nothing says love like pulling your sponsorship.

My spare time is quite hard earned. But no, I've never paid enough money to sponsor the club with the hope of brandishing that sponsorship for my own outcomes whilst earning the condemnation of the board and administration of the club.

You are a pissant supporter the club could do without.

And so can I. Foe list for you, your replies will not be read.

Footy Chick wrote:They appear very *ahem* "close"

This just adds value.

Have you assessed the posters? It may be that there are multiple opinions being expressed by multiple people.

Sent from my GT-I9300T using Tapatalk

I've always hated every team except Centrals. Was that wrong?

Sent from my GT-I9300T using Tapatalk

Change the locks.

Sent from my GT-I9300T using Tapatalk

The courts are no place for a man who wants another job.

He was bollocked by an organisation that was keen to collect points from the master franchisee. It helped with future negotiations, apparently.

Sent from my GT-I9300T using Tapatalk

Ian wrote:Well done to the Bays, so far it's only been Centrals to let down the SANFL clubs

Yet we're still not even for being let down ourselves at some meeting last year...

scott wrote:

CUTTERMAN wrote:9 rounds in and Sturt still have no TV game.

Sturt has three TV games between Round's 10 and 16.

Why can't the full schedule be released if a select few know it?

At least with cricket the 'grow our market through bastardizing the traditional game' was done with a whole new format.

AFL on the other hand has ****** it right up.

Finally started watching House of Cards on Friday.

Up to season 2, ep 3 already.

I'll let Port Adelaide people decide whether they are the Magpies, or the Power.
Not all of them can seem to make up their mind.

Being an Eagles supporter, I can relate to other people telling you what your club is or isn't and you are right, all that really matters is what the Port people think. It is their club.

However, there are more issues than identity at play here.

Thank, You.

I've noted several times that I'm interested in people's definition of what a "club" is.

Is it the letter head on an official document?
Is it the guernsey?
Is it the song they sing?
Is it the people who support it?

I think it would be pretty hard to define what a "football club" actually is.
A club is people. Supporters, players, administrators. All the other stuff is what makes it different to other clubs.

Oooohhhh please, can't wait for more of our players that we've developed over the last 5-10 years on a drip fed budget to be snapped up by an AFL club for a half of f-all drip fed payment (if you're lucky) only to have them play against us in a state league comp.
Where do we sign?
That's a good point. Now I wish our players are drafted interstate to avoid that situation.

But these cookies define your identity crisis perfectly.

heater31 wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:this may be a record.... 12 hours since a comment hasn't been made on here... well done lads

Piss poor attempt at a troll post as well...

Perhaps you could find a moderator to delete it then?

Dogwatcher wrote::(

I guess there won't be a Drop Dead Fred II, as had been the talk.

Its a documentary.

It's far more likely that no one gave a shit about it.

Show cause notices handed down thus afternoon, should only be a few years before its all concluded.

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk

Mrs smac is a florist, buying flowers is never expected (she'd only pick on them because she didn't arrange them).

If only she were also a jeweller.

Great to see the SANFL back after a month off. Pity it's being played on another ******* continent.

My tip: half past eleven.

Thought they'd be more concerned about fixing the present than the past.

He should be sacked.

"hey mate, I think you've got too many on the field."

All fixed.

Lucky the current players don't have to venture to Vic Park then.

Geez you're a bunch of ****.

Good luck to him, I can imagine you all falling over yourselves if he and Coz lead us to a Shield.

Wow.

No mention of your God or any of the other 6,000 Gods people believe in at my wedding.

What if the constitution is changed to allow marriage between any 2 humans? Your post staggers me. Are you still looking for the whites only bus as well?

Maybe he can have lunch with Brad Symes then.

Good to see you're off the fence with that issue!

I believe my club are currently celebrating today's crowd at Alberton.

Pretty sure it means **** all.

Magpiespower wrote:And I have to take my 77yo Mum to the latter or she'll go absolutely boonta...

Ruth Cracknell and Gary McDonald have nothing on you two.

So the ambassadors/journos in Adelaide will ignore it then.

Lol, just about sums up the spud
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfa1/v/t1.0-9/q71/s720x720/10487442_355243404623139_8603658080999365675_n.jpg?oh=e7747bc5197af695abf98f11ca3b55f4&oe=543AADF9&__gda__=1414083412_3dfb5302b5e302942f3c393f5648d6ae
I'd rather look at the fact he sat with the cheer squad for a while as summing him up. Obviously a more personable bloke than most in his line of work.

smac wrote:Can you show me where Centrals have benefited from the entry of Crows and Port reserves?

Sorry @bennymacca, you seemed to have been distracted - thought I would ask this one again.

Really simple question that I don't think has an answer.

TimmiesChin wrote:

smac wrote:For Centrals, I asked.

I'd say Centrals TV ad is a winner all round !!

The one on channel 9, that has nothing to do with Crows or Port?

Didn't look like play on, my commentary was more on the apology than either passage of play. If the umpire ****** up, why in he'll would the beneficiary apologise?

Bullshit. That's a terrible look.

And they'll cop a whack for it, if that is the final finding.

The anti doping rules also state there is a prescribed method for investigations - they should be made to follow it.

Or maybe "greater media coverage" would have made it more obvious.

Why? Did it move?

Funnily enough, I see that SACA logo as a massive bendover by SACA. I'm not surprised by it, but it makes me laugh in light of the SANFL/AFL relationship.

Keys in the bowl?

Don't go too early!

East Terrace Continental.

Worth the walk, best breakfast in town.

SMA isn't a profit centre.

And Kochy stopped whinging when it was pointed out he'd sold only 35% of corporate facilities, leading to his club not reaching profit forecasts for Adelaide Oval game day.