NA V PA trial

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Postby JK » Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:38 am

Couple of questions for anyone who was at the game ...

What are Norths Ruck stocks like this year?

Did Ben Hart and/or Stribling play?

Where was Jarjoura used and how did he look?

How did the players cope with the new in the back rule/policing?

What sorta nick was the Oval in?
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Postby Wedgie » Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:43 am

Constance_Perm wrote:Couple of questions for anyone who was at the game ...

What are Norths Ruck stocks like this year?

Did Ben Hart and/or Stribling play?

Where was Jarjoura used and how did he look?

How did the players cope with the new in the back rule/policing?

What sorta nick was the Oval in?


1) O'Hara and Wakelin, not much depth after that, think Matt Down and that's about it, Schubert actually rucked in the ressies on Friday Night.

2) No and Yes, Stribling played Ressies, Ben Hart is on a modified training program with Wintle and Howard and is expected to play in our last trial

3) Kicked a couple of goals, not exactly sure of where he played but looked good in the passages I noticed

4) Didn't seem any different.

5) Fantastic
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby rod_rooster » Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:48 am

Constance_Perm wrote:Couple of questions for anyone who was at the game ...

What are Norths Ruck stocks like this year?

Did Ben Hart and/or Stribling play?

Where was Jarjoura used and how did he look?

How did the players cope with the new in the back rule/policing?

What sorta nick was the Oval in?


Hart didn't play. He is on a modified program with a few others and will play in the last trial against the Eagles on March 31.

Stribling played in the 2's i think.

Rucks this year are O'hara and Wakelin.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Postby JK » Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:50 am

Thanks lads
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Postby johntheclaret » Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:27 am

Dogwatcher wrote: Look at cricket - they play first class matches on that ground in England with a tree that encroaches onto the field


That ain't no tree. That's our captain :roll:
johntheclaret
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13277
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:39 am
Has liked: 409 times
Been liked: 580 times

Postby johntheclaret » Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:37 am

Wedgie wrote:Back to the game best players and goalkickers as per paper this morning:

Port - Best: Slattery, Meiklejohn, DePasquale, Summerton, AhChee.
North - Best: Allan, Sporn, Wakelin, Ryswyk, McIntyre.

Port - Goals: Lecras 3, Jarjoura 2, Poulton, Jenner, Elstone, Batson, Summerton, Perkins, Slattery, C.Miller, Hay.
North - Goals: Weatherley 3, Ladhams 2, Krieg, Sportn, Allan, Younie, S.Motlop.


Dunno which paper, but good to se Allan one of the Roosters best. Trial or no trial, looks to be a really good prospect (pardon the pun)
johntheclaret
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13277
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:39 am
Has liked: 409 times
Been liked: 580 times

Postby - » Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:12 am

Why does it take an accident to fix somthing.

The wall is a disgrace and totally unsafe.
Never give a sucker an even break

Nor ban a user for an acceptable topic of discussion.

"Baby on board". Why dont you put a sign on ur car saying "adult on board" or "car stereo in use"?
-
Reserves
 
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:12 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby rod_rooster » Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:20 am

- wrote:Why does it take an accident to fix somthing.

The wall is a disgrace and totally unsafe.


Agree with that. Surely there should be something done to rectify the problem. Bring the boundary line further in and add a heap of padding at the very least.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Postby JK » Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:05 pm

Whilst I don't think it's a huge risk (and almost 100 years of footy would verify that), the fact remains that there is the potential for serious injury and I would hate to see anyone slam into the thing, so padding or something would be nice.

I hope everyone is aware that as soon as that happens and it becomes the norm for a few years all grounds will no doubt receive calls to pad their fencing too
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Postby topsywaldron » Tue Mar 20, 2007 1:18 pm

If Norwood move their boundary lines in any further they will fall out of the legislated minimum size an SANFL oval can be. This was discussed when a Norwood player sued the club a few years ago for an injury caused, ironically enough, when a player hit one of the advertising signs on the outer and broke his thumb really badly.

Sorry for posting something relevant to a thread. It won't happen again. :D
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 218 times

Postby Dogwatcher » Tue Mar 20, 2007 2:54 pm

topsywaldron wrote:If Norwood move their boundary lines in any further they will fall out of the legislated minimum size an SANFL oval can be.


Would that be such a bad thing? ;)
Last edited by Dogwatcher on Tue Mar 20, 2007 4:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Postby Leaping Lindner » Tue Mar 20, 2007 4:16 pm

I may be wrong but seem to recall hearing that Barrie Barbary was badly injured when he ran into "the wall" back in the late 60's when he was playing for Woodville.
"They got Burton suits, ha, you think it's funny,turning rebellion into money"
User avatar
Leaping Lindner
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4325
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:02 pm
Location: Victoria
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 48 times

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Tue Mar 20, 2007 5:00 pm

- wrote:Why does it take an accident to fix somthing.

The wall is a disgrace and totally unsafe.


Don't be silly, more players get injured falling into and over fences than they do running into the wall at Norwood Oval. It's a non-issue.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Tue Mar 20, 2007 5:07 pm

Leaping Lindner wrote:I may be wrong but seem to recall hearing that Barrie Barbary was badly injured when he ran into "the wall" back in the late 60's when he was playing for Woodville.


I recall Barbary playing for Woodville at Norwood Oval, but I cannot recall him being injured. Maybe your Footy Worlds may tell the story. If you find anything, please let me know.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby RustyCage » Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:44 pm

At Alberton there is one padded sign, which says something like SafetyAd: Protecting our Magpies or something like that. Seems a good idea, but would cost a bit.
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 15304
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 1269 times
Been liked: 938 times

Postby robranosgod » Wed Mar 21, 2007 12:16 pm

Leaping Lindner wrote:I may be wrong but seem to recall hearing that Barrie Barbary was badly injured when he ran into "the wall" back in the late 60's when he was playing for Woodville.


You are spot on. It was on the Saturday night replay. Barrie had a convulsion whilst lying on the ground after hitting the wall. I vividly remember seeing Norwood's club doctor, Brian Sando running out to treat him.

Norwood's Peter Vivian, not to be confused with "Milky" Vivian from Central. also hit the wall in the early 1960s and I believe was seriously injured.

I have always been amazed that it is not an OH&S issue.
robranosgod
Rookie
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 12:52 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby robranosgod » Wed Mar 21, 2007 12:20 pm

Constance_Perm wrote:Whilst I don't think it's a huge risk (and almost 100 years of footy would verify that), the fact remains that there is the potential for serious injury and I would hate to see anyone slam into the thing, so padding or something would be nice.

The stand was built in the 1950s, so it is "only" 50 years of footy that we are talking about.

I would be interested to know how many players have actually been imjured "hitting the wall" at Norwood.
robranosgod
Rookie
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 12:52 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby JK » Wed Mar 21, 2007 12:41 pm

robranosgod wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote:Whilst I don't think it's a huge risk (and almost 100 years of footy would verify that), the fact remains that there is the potential for serious injury and I would hate to see anyone slam into the thing, so padding or something would be nice.

The stand was built in the 1950s, so it is "only" 50 years of footy that we are talking about.

I would be interested to know how many players have actually been imjured "hitting the wall" at Norwood.


Thanks for clearing that up for me ROG ... Still 50 years is a long time and I've not heard of any recent injury (last 25 years), not suggesting it isn't an issue, just perhaps not as bad as some think.

Interesting thought, if the wall were padded would it have the potential to incite more players trying to force his opponent into it?
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:17 pm

Constance_Perm wrote:
robranosgod wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote:Whilst I don't think it's a huge risk (and almost 100 years of footy would verify that), the fact remains that there is the potential for serious injury and I would hate to see anyone slam into the thing, so padding or something would be nice.

The stand was built in the 1950s, so it is "only" 50 years of footy that we are talking about.

I would be interested to know how many players have actually been imjured "hitting the wall" at Norwood.


Thanks for clearing that up for me ROG ... Still 50 years is a long time and I've not heard of any recent injury (last 25 years), not suggesting it isn't an issue, just perhaps not as bad as some think.

Interesting thought, if the wall were padded would it have the potential to incite more players trying to force his opponent into it?


I don't know if many people in this discussion have played on Norwood Oval, but when you are out there playing, the wall is an non-issue. It's no different to a normal fence running along a boundary line.

As you run towards the boundary line you slow down, otherwise you will run into the fence. It's the same with the wall, only the wall can be safer because you can put your hands out to prevent a collision.

There have been far more issues of players getting injured sliding into the concrete under the fences at Football Park than there have been at Norwood Oval, and they have a wider gap between the line and the fence at Footy Park.

There have also been more players injured running into the goal posts. Perhaps we should remove them for player safety.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Dogwatcher » Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:37 pm

I totally agree AH.
It is a non-issue.
But because it's something out of the norm, it's always going to be a talking point.

However......we see similar walls around entire major league baseball diamonds and they're all padded. I know they use the walls differently, but...
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 18 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |