The Positives vs The Negatives of websites on SANFL clubs

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: The Positives vs The Negatives of websites on SANFL clubs

Postby smithy » Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:17 am

It's not that hard to put 10 years of history onto a website,,,,surely. :)
smithy
 

Re: The Positives vs The Negatives of websites on SANFL clubs

Postby pipers » Wed Aug 22, 2007 9:02 am

smithy wrote:It's not that hard to put 10 years of history onto a website,,,,surely. :)


:(

LOL - not bad. Pay that!
"loyalty is dead"
User avatar
pipers
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:35 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Adelaide Lutheran

Re: The Positives vs The Negatives of websites on SANFL clubs

Postby bulldogproud » Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:47 pm

fatalberton wrote:
topsywaldron wrote:The punk rock child is obviously sleeping well if you've got the time, or indeed the inclination, to read the ever cheerful Norwood forum.

And to think I thought you were happy with LeCras at CHF. :D

Will you be there on Saturday Fatal?


I will. With little Johnny and the missus in tow too...

Bowls club. Right in the pocket. Near a bloke with a bike.


I didn't know Stan Wickham was going to be there *grins*
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
bulldogproud
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3113
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
Location: West Beach
Has liked: 489 times
Been liked: 401 times
Grassroots Team: Imperials

Re: The Positives vs The Negatives of websites on SANFL clubs

Postby eddie-eagle » Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:04 pm

spell_check wrote:
eddie-eagle wrote:Lonie & White were also named in best players in both print media outlets.


As we know, a very unreliable source that is. :lol:


Make that three print media outlets. With the messenger. Surely all three can't be wrong, they are not all the same players or in the same order
eddie-eagle
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: The Positives vs The Negatives of websites on SANFL clubs

Postby spell_check » Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:08 pm

eddie-eagle wrote:
spell_check wrote:
eddie-eagle wrote:Lonie & White were also named in best players in both print media outlets.


As we know, a very unreliable source that is. :lol:


Make that three print media outlets. With the messenger. Surely all three can't be wrong, they are not all the same players or in the same order


The SANFL website has Motlop and Hart as the best two players for North. Luke Jarrad as our best, followed by Lindsay.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Re: The Positives vs The Negatives of websites on SANFL clubs

Postby Wedgie » Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:28 pm

spell_check wrote:The SANFL website has Motlop and Hart as the best two players for North. Luke Jarrad as our best, followed by Lindsay.


Spot on too, Motlop and Hart were the 2 best and the 2 I gave my votes for in the Roost Player of the Year award last week.
Anyone that had Lonie ahead of those 2 has no idea about football.
Lindsay's an interesting one as looking at stats the North rucks just won that contest, probably fair though as Lindsay did most of it on his own shoulders where North were a tag team.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |