Rd 21 live scores

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Rd 21 live scores

Postby NFC » Sat Aug 25, 2007 7:33 pm

shanghaied wrote:Any idea about the size of the crowds thus far?

Crowd at Alberton? Bout 3,500?

Deserved a LOT more.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Rd 21 live scores

Postby JAS » Sat Aug 25, 2007 7:36 pm

Bloody marvellous...now I find the new live scoreboard thing on the SANFL web site :evil: :roll:

Regards
JAS
You can't be a pirate if you don't have a beard. I said so. MY boat, MY rules.

We haven't got a plank. Just ******* jump


Trust no one The truth is everyone is going to let you down you eventually
User avatar
JAS
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12431
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 8:22 pm
Location: Scotland
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Rd 21 live scores

Postby Wedgie » Sat Aug 25, 2007 8:26 pm

Graham wrote:
goraw wrote:rule out the roosters from the gf. out in the elim.


Oops, soory, I thought they were a 10 goal better side than the Eagles last week (with all the umpire bleating that was going on) not only that but they were the better side for 3 qtrs and "ONLY" lost by 3 pts. By that theory they were outplayed in 1 qtr by a team lower on the ladder. How many goals were Glenelg "gifted" today. Given they kicked 7 more goals than we kicked last week, North should only have lost by 3 goals today.


Glenelg weren't gifted any goals today, in fact North had the better of the umpiring IMHO, I always call it straight down the line.

In fairness, North were probably a 5 goal better side than the Eagles last week IMHO, not 10.
On paper North IMHO have the best team in the comp (not by much over the Dogs) but as they are so mentally insipid its irrelevent.
North will always crumble in the games that count, might as well as pack up and start working on 2008.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Rd 21 live scores

Postby Jimmy » Sat Aug 25, 2007 9:10 pm

the port/legs game looked a ripper, bad luck legs.

bays, bloody hell. north, wtf???
Carn the blues!!!!!
Jimmy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:02 pm
Has liked: 125 times
Been liked: 44 times

Re: Rd 21 live scores

Postby johntheclaret » Sat Aug 25, 2007 9:23 pm

Graham wrote:Hows Wedgie feeling now after the "I am more confident after losing to the Eagles" statement after losing to the Eagles last week (not withstanding the 10 goals we were gifted last week). Yes, losing after dominating for 3 qtrs would make me feel confident too :shock: How many goals were Glenelg gifted today ??? Seeing as they kicked so many I no doubt would have thought there would have been quite a few :lol:


They were gifted a hatful today Graham. Unfortunately, it was by the North players and not the umps. :oops:
johntheclaret
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13277
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:39 am
Has liked: 409 times
Been liked: 580 times

Re: Rd 21 live scores

Postby Dirko » Sat Aug 25, 2007 9:25 pm

johntheclaret wrote:
Graham wrote:Hows Wedgie feeling now after the "I am more confident after losing to the Eagles" statement after losing to the Eagles last week (not withstanding the 10 goals we were gifted last week). Yes, losing after dominating for 3 qtrs would make me feel confident too :shock: How many goals were Glenelg gifted today ??? Seeing as they kicked so many I no doubt would have thought there would have been quite a few :lol:


They were gifted a hatful today Graham. Unfortunately, it was by the North players and not the umps. :oops:


Correct, as I posted in game thread, the Bays applied great pressure today..
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Rd 21 live scores

Postby Jimmy » Sat Aug 25, 2007 9:36 pm

dogs just too good for the blues so far.

showing their class.

up by 7 goals i think, early last 1/4
Carn the blues!!!!!
Jimmy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:02 pm
Has liked: 125 times
Been liked: 44 times

Re: Rd 21 live scores

Postby blues2002 » Sat Aug 25, 2007 10:56 pm

Wedgie wrote:[On paper North IMHO have the best team in the comp (not by much over the Dogs) but as they are so mentally insipid its irrelevent.
North will always crumble in the games that count, might as well as pack up and start working on 2008.


Christ, what a fanboi u are. Wish I had a $ for every person who thought their underforming team was the best but - errrrr BUT ...
... ripped off by umpires
... mentally insipid
... torn apart by club infighting
... (insert own sad ass excuse here...)
User avatar
blues2002
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 425
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 9:14 pm
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 6 times
Grassroots Team: Gaza

Re: Rd 21 live scores

Postby Hondo » Sat Aug 25, 2007 11:13 pm

blues2002 wrote:Christ, what a fanboi u are. Wish I had a $ for every person who thought their underforming team was the best but - errrrr BUT ...
... ripped off by umpires
... mentally insipid
... torn apart by club infighting
... (insert own sad ass excuse here...)


I think the comments from some North supporters are public commentary on Jars' coaching, rightly or wrongly, rather than being excuses necessarially
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Rd 21 live scores

Postby blues2002 » Sat Aug 25, 2007 11:32 pm

hondo71 wrote:
blues2002 wrote:Christ, what a fanboi u are. Wish I had a $ for every person who thought their underforming team was the best but - errrrr BUT ...
... ripped off by umpires
... mentally insipid
... torn apart by club infighting
... (insert own sad ass excuse here...)


I think the comments from some North supporters are public commentary on Jars' coaching, rightly or wrongly, rather than being excuses necessarially


Yeah, I guess u are right. Jars aint the worst coach going around, I guess history will see him as a bad coach. Shame, I think he has a lot to offer, maybe not at Norf though.... eg he went on public record once about being remiss about not getting a shot at the job at Sturt (maybe it was just just a typical Jars throw away line, anyway Im sure someone on here can correct me) ... anyway IMHO Jars for all his bluff has turned NAFC into a competetive unit from a humble position, maybe someone alse can do the the Honor of getting flag....
User avatar
blues2002
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 425
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 9:14 pm
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 6 times
Grassroots Team: Gaza

Re: Rd 21 live scores

Postby Pseudo » Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:39 am

blues2002 wrote: maybe someone alse can do the the Honor of getting flag....

Surely you weren't suggesting Brenton take over the reins?
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1656 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Re: Rd 21 live scores

Postby Aerie » Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:46 am

Wedgie wrote:
Graham wrote:
goraw wrote:rule out the roosters from the gf. out in the elim.


Oops, soory, I thought they were a 10 goal better side than the Eagles last week (with all the umpire bleating that was going on) not only that but they were the better side for 3 qtrs and "ONLY" lost by 3 pts. By that theory they were outplayed in 1 qtr by a team lower on the ladder. How many goals were Glenelg "gifted" today. Given they kicked 7 more goals than we kicked last week, North should only have lost by 3 goals today.


Glenelg weren't gifted any goals today, in fact North had the better of the umpiring IMHO, I always call it straight down the line.

In fairness, North were probably a 5 goal better side than the Eagles last week IMHO, not 10.
On paper North IMHO have the best team in the comp (not by much over the Dogs) but as they are so mentally insipid its irrelevent.
North will always crumble in the games that count, might as well as pack up and start working on 2008.


What does the 'H' stand for in IMHO?
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5748
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:05 am
Has liked: 186 times
Been liked: 590 times

Re: Rd 21 live scores

Postby spell_check » Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:47 am

Aerie wrote:
Wedgie wrote:
Graham wrote:
goraw wrote:rule out the roosters from the gf. out in the elim.


Oops, soory, I thought they were a 10 goal better side than the Eagles last week (with all the umpire bleating that was going on) not only that but they were the better side for 3 qtrs and "ONLY" lost by 3 pts. By that theory they were outplayed in 1 qtr by a team lower on the ladder. How many goals were Glenelg "gifted" today. Given they kicked 7 more goals than we kicked last week, North should only have lost by 3 goals today.


Glenelg weren't gifted any goals today, in fact North had the better of the umpiring IMHO, I always call it straight down the line.

In fairness, North were probably a 5 goal better side than the Eagles last week IMHO, not 10.
On paper North IMHO have the best team in the comp (not by much over the Dogs) but as they are so mentally insipid its irrelevent.
North will always crumble in the games that count, might as well as pack up and start working on 2008.


What does the 'H' stand for in IMHO?


Humble, I think.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Re: Rd 21 live scores

Postby GWW » Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:48 am

I always thought it was "honest".
User avatar
GWW
Moderator
 
Posts: 15681
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Eastern suburbs of Adelaide
Has liked: 817 times
Been liked: 168 times

Re: Rd 21 live scores

Postby spell_check » Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:51 am

GWW wrote:I always thought it was "honest".


It might be that, or it could be both, don't know for sure.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Re: Rd 21 live scores

Postby Aerie » Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:53 am

spell_check wrote:
Aerie wrote:
Wedgie wrote:
Graham wrote:
Oops, soory, I thought they were a 10 goal better side than the Eagles last week (with all the umpire bleating that was going on) not only that but they were the better side for 3 qtrs and "ONLY" lost by 3 pts. By that theory they were outplayed in 1 qtr by a team lower on the ladder. How many goals were Glenelg "gifted" today. Given they kicked 7 more goals than we kicked last week, North should only have lost by 3 goals today.


Glenelg weren't gifted any goals today, in fact North had the better of the umpiring IMHO, I always call it straight down the line.

In fairness, North were probably a 5 goal better side than the Eagles last week IMHO, not 10.
On paper North IMHO have the best team in the comp (not by much over the Dogs) but as they are so mentally insipid its irrelevent.
North will always crumble in the games that count, might as well as pack up and start working on 2008.


What does the 'H' stand for in IMHO?


Humble, I think.


That's what I thought it may have been... :lol:
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5748
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:05 am
Has liked: 186 times
Been liked: 590 times

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |