purch wrote:Brucetiki wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Did anyone else find yesterdays "front page" of the Advertiser "off"? Surely the lady is entitled to some dignity?
IMO, the whole reporting of the entire inquest has been a disgrace, and the following day's letters to the editor pretty much echoed what Punk Rooster said (I was surprised The Antagoniser gave so much space for those letters). Soon The Adveritiser going to be needed to be covered in black plastic with a big R inside a diamond on the outside of the plastic.
I hope Mediawatch do a big song and dance about it - if alerted they'll have a field day over this.
Oh yes Brucetiki / Punk, Media Watch had a bit to say about the front page you refer to I think. Disgraceful. The original photo was more tasteful than the edit. I'm ashamed to say my face was in that paper a few weeks ago, albeit on a brighter note, but alas...hmmmmorons
Yeah i also watched media watch last night, they really dug in about this one. "not a good week for the tiser" and "substandard" are a few words going around to talk about the tiser. I also like the bit where the journist said that he did infact to a check to see if it was the right person but this proved to be inadequate. lol thats funny, I mean whos going to believe that shit, he did no checks and just jump on it. Disgraceful, I hope Matthew slade - the 5 times primership footballer gets stuck in to the tiser. Once again the Disgraceful performace by the tiser....
