 by Adelaide Hawk » Sat May 20, 2006 7:01 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Sat May 20, 2006 7:01 pm 
			
			The thing I don't understand about umpiring is we have rules.  Why don't umpires just adjudicate on the rules instead of trying to interpret them?  I mean, if a player is pushed in the back, pay a free.  If a player is held without possesion, pay a free.  All these rule interpretations are keeping umpires in two minds which is causing the mediocrity and inconsistency.