Cupido Poll 1: Was he guilty?
37 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
by Dog_ger » Sat Sep 16, 2006 2:32 pm
Not Guilty...
Smile :)
It's only Money $$$ :)
What is happening to our SANFL guys...
It's only Money $$$ :)
What is happening to our SANFL guys...
-
Dog_ger - Coach
-
- Posts: 6536
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:25 pm
- Location: Salisbury Downs
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 19 times
by am Bays » Sat Sep 16, 2006 3:49 pm
Law 19.2.2 (g) v makes no mention to open hand it mere states striking another person...
Can be open hand, under hand back hand forehand clenched hand you name it a strike is a strike is a strike....
South supporters should take their medicine they have already flaunted got away with an inadequately light sentance vis-a-vis the salary cap.
Maybe if the whinge some more, they can get some more handouts.....
Maybe they haven't got there original zone but unlike every other club they have had a home-ground built for them for the cost of a peppercorn......
Can be open hand, under hand back hand forehand clenched hand you name it a strike is a strike is a strike....
South supporters should take their medicine they have already flaunted got away with an inadequately light sentance vis-a-vis the salary cap.
Maybe if the whinge some more, they can get some more handouts.....
Maybe they haven't got there original zone but unlike every other club they have had a home-ground built for them for the cost of a peppercorn......
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
-
RoosterMarty - Coach
-
- Posts: 6524
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 9:30 pm
- Location: Adelaide (near Prospect Oval)
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 0 time
by Wedgie » Sat Sep 16, 2006 5:13 pm
Is it a coincidence only Glenelg supporters (not all, kudos to the one or two who commented on it on merit alone), retards and the SANFL agree with this punishment?
Come On, try to look at the decision from a level point of view, Im not even sure why Glenelg fans are jumping on the "they should accept it" bandwagon when Mouse got off for doing something far worse. FFS Glenelg are now out of the competition in 2006, get over it!
All SANFL fans should be outraged over this decision, just put yoursevles in their shoes and at the very least ask yourselves the question why the WAFL, the VFL, the AFL and many other leagues have avenues of appeal in case a mistake is made but the SANFL doesn't.
Come On, try to look at the decision from a level point of view, Im not even sure why Glenelg fans are jumping on the "they should accept it" bandwagon when Mouse got off for doing something far worse. FFS Glenelg are now out of the competition in 2006, get over it!
All SANFL fans should be outraged over this decision, just put yoursevles in their shoes and at the very least ask yourselves the question why the WAFL, the VFL, the AFL and many other leagues have avenues of appeal in case a mistake is made but the SANFL doesn't.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sat Sep 16, 2006 5:33 pm
hey im in the majority of glenelg fans that believe that MOUSE SHOULD HAVE been suspended and CUPIDO should have got off.
Mouse was clearly worse then Cupido, it was only the fine acting performance oF McConnell that made it look a hell of a lot worse then what it was.
Mouse was clearly worse then Cupido, it was only the fine acting performance oF McConnell that made it look a hell of a lot worse then what it was.
-
mighty_tiger_79 - Coach
-
- Posts: 60941
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
- Location: at the TAB
- Has liked: 13434 times
- Been liked: 4642 times
by Wedgie » Sat Sep 16, 2006 5:35 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:hey im in the majority of glenelg fans that believe that MOUSE SHOULD HAVE been suspended and CUPIDO should have got off.
Mouse was clearly worse then Cupido, it was only the fine acting performance oF McConnell that made it look a hell of a lot worse then what it was.
Yeah I was thinking of you when I said the one or two who I gave kudos too but it seems a minority more than a majority. Perhaps its just some poor trolling that I'm taking the wrong way?
-
blueandwhite - League - Best 21
-
- Posts: 1658
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Cloney Harp
- Has liked: 26 times
- Been liked: 219 times
- Grassroots Team: Jamestown-Peterborough
by Apachebulldog » Sat Sep 16, 2006 7:13 pm
Have finally seen the incident NOT GUILTY SANFL tribunal you are a joke absolutely pathetic.
Its starting to become a sissy's game just like the AFL.
You should all be ashamed a total disgrace.
Its payback for the salary cap breach .
SCRAP da CAP !!!
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF !!!!!!
Its starting to become a sissy's game just like the AFL.
You should all be ashamed a total disgrace.
Its payback for the salary cap breach .
SCRAP da CAP !!!
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF !!!!!!
SANFL 2000 - 2011 Central District 12 consecutive Grand Final appearances and 9 Premierships.
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFF.
Hit em hard let them get up and hit em again.
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFF.
Hit em hard let them get up and hit em again.
-
Apachebulldog - League - Best 21
-
- Posts: 2387
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:05 pm
- Location: On the prairie
- Has liked: 381 times
- Been liked: 115 times
by Pseudo » Sat Sep 16, 2006 8:37 pm
Wedgie wrote:Is it a coincidence only Glenelg supporters (not all, kudos to the one or two who commented on it on merit alone), retards and the SANFL agree with this punishment?
As moderator, can you determine who put in the "yes" votes? Care to tell us which teams they support?
Like I said earlier - my own vote was a "no". Bet I'm not the only Bays fan in that total.
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
by once_were_warriors » Sat Sep 16, 2006 8:44 pm
Guilty
Reprimand and bond based on that he must not venture into any takeaway food store until after south have finished their finals campaign
Reprimand and bond based on that he must not venture into any takeaway food store until after south have finished their finals campaign
If at first you don't succeed , then destroy all evidence that you tried in the first place
- once_were_warriors
- Under 18s
-
- Posts: 636
- Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 1:46 pm
- Location: under Scoreboard Woody Oval
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 2 times
by Wedgie » Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:29 pm
Pseudo wrote:Wedgie wrote:Is it a coincidence only Glenelg supporters (not all, kudos to the one or two who commented on it on merit alone), retards and the SANFL agree with this punishment?
As moderator, can you determine who put in the "yes" votes? Care to tell us which teams they support?
Like I said earlier - my own vote was a "no". Bet I'm not the only Bays fan in that total.
Nah mate, not even as Site Admin can I tell who voted for who.
by am Bays » Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:51 pm
The poll asks was he guilty or not guilty - nothing about the sentance handed out, The first part of my post was merely making reference to the laws of Austrlian Footy.
Under those laws he is guilty, should he have been reported well that is for a different poll. If I had to be honest, from someone who was there (all beit 150 m away unlike the umpire) it should have been a down field at most....
The second part of my post is a comment on the selective views some people have when it comes to punishments handed out by the SANFL. Damn quiet when they are given a gift by the SANFL, (only a $50k fine) when it should have been far worse, especially as the evidece was handed to teh SANFL on a platter vis-a-vis a deliberate attempt to rort the cap. In other words it wasn't simply an overpayment as per Centrals it was case of here is your official contract and here is the nudge nudge wink wink say-no-more contract that we will actually pay you.
Hey we'll take that inadequate punishment but we will whinge a moan when Stupido gets a week when he shouldn't have got any......
Swings and roundabouts, swings and roundabouts....
Oh Blue and White tell me how premierships you won in 85 years, let alone GFs played in and finals series you've made......I can handle crap from every other club supporter against us, but I just laugh when it is a South supporter dishing it out.......
Under those laws he is guilty, should he have been reported well that is for a different poll. If I had to be honest, from someone who was there (all beit 150 m away unlike the umpire) it should have been a down field at most....
The second part of my post is a comment on the selective views some people have when it comes to punishments handed out by the SANFL. Damn quiet when they are given a gift by the SANFL, (only a $50k fine) when it should have been far worse, especially as the evidece was handed to teh SANFL on a platter vis-a-vis a deliberate attempt to rort the cap. In other words it wasn't simply an overpayment as per Centrals it was case of here is your official contract and here is the nudge nudge wink wink say-no-more contract that we will actually pay you.
Hey we'll take that inadequate punishment but we will whinge a moan when Stupido gets a week when he shouldn't have got any......
Swings and roundabouts, swings and roundabouts....
Oh Blue and White tell me how premierships you won in 85 years, let alone GFs played in and finals series you've made......I can handle crap from every other club supporter against us, but I just laugh when it is a South supporter dishing it out.......
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
by Wedgie » Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:55 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Oh Blue and White tell me how premierships you won in 85 years, let alone GFs played in and finals series you've made......I can handle crap from every other club supporter against us, but I just laugh when it is a South supporter dishing it out.......
I hate to jump on the Panthers bandwagon but you're asking for it!!
Why worry about the last 85 years?
Why not just look at this century?
South: 1 final (plus possibly more)
Glenelg: 0
by am Bays » Sat Sep 16, 2006 10:12 pm
Wedgie wrote:
Why worry about the last 85 years?
Why not just look at this century?
South: 1 final (plus possibly more)
Glenelg: 0
Just using the same logical arguement that has been used agaisnt us for the last 85 years, didn't know it was the domain of certain clubs....
Ah well I susppose your right, winners are grinners and losers can go please themselves...
I susppose its good the peasants get a taste of the action once in a while.....
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
by Wedgie » Sat Sep 16, 2006 10:20 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:I susppose its good the peasants get a taste of the action once in a while.....
Just a shame that the Glenelg peasants don't though.
by MightyEagles » Sun Sep 17, 2006 12:31 pm
If he was a Gowans he would get off. 
WOOOOO, Premiers 1993, 2006 and 2011!
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
- MightyEagles
- Coach
-
- Posts: 11771
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:38 pm
- Location: The MightyEagles Memorial Timekeepers Box
- Has liked: 10 times
- Been liked: 12 times
- Grassroots Team: United Eagles
by Spiritof64 » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:49 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Law 19.2.2 (g) v makes no mention to open hand it mere states striking another person...
Can be open hand, under hand back hand forehand clenched hand you name it a strike is a strike is a strike..........
Except when it's a push.
Do you work on a night cart Tassie?
I'm glad I'm just an ordinary old fart. Your life as a bitter old fart must be depressing.
The Older I get the BETTER I WAS!!!!
-
Spiritof64 - Under 16s
-
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 8:19 pm
- Location: Hackham West
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
- Grassroots Team: North Whyalla
37 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Football SANFL
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests
Advertisements by Advertisement Management