by Rushby Hinds » Tue Mar 28, 2006 10:47 pm
by Punk Rooster » Tue Mar 28, 2006 10:51 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by drebin » Tue Mar 28, 2006 10:53 pm
by Rushby Hinds » Tue Mar 28, 2006 10:53 pm
by Punk Rooster » Tue Mar 28, 2006 10:55 pm
I honestly wouldn't know- I only made a statement that I know to be true, & that is that North have 80 pokies.Borat wrote:So you are saying that North aren't in the top 3000 clubs in Australia Punky?
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Rushby Hinds » Tue Mar 28, 2006 10:56 pm
by Punk Rooster » Tue Mar 28, 2006 10:58 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Rushby Hinds » Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:03 pm
by drebin » Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:10 pm
by Grand Central » Wed Mar 29, 2006 12:41 am
by drebin » Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:46 am
by Magpiespower » Wed Mar 29, 2006 8:11 am
The court decided its operation of a "miniature Las Vegas"
by Wedgie » Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:01 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Rushby Hinds » Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:26 am
Wedgie wrote:
PS Not sure what difference South and Centrals have from most of ther SANFL clubs so dont know why they were mentioned and not the Glenelgs, Westies, etc??
by doggies4eva » Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:47 am
by topsywaldron » Wed Mar 29, 2006 12:33 pm
by Rushby Hinds » Wed Mar 29, 2006 1:44 pm
doggies4eva wrote:Get real. If they took away the tax status of SANFL clubs pokie operations there would not be a sporting club in the country left that would qualify. That will never happen.
by doggies4eva » Wed Mar 29, 2006 2:03 pm
Borat wrote:doggies4eva wrote:Get real. If they took away the tax status of SANFL clubs pokie operations there would not be a sporting club in the country left that would qualify. That will never happen.
It's not the ATO's job to care. There job is to collect as much tax as they can where they think it should be paid. Convesely, they offer education to people who are paying too much tax if there is a legitimate way for them to reduce tax.
by Rushby Hinds » Wed Mar 29, 2006 2:55 pm
doggies4eva wrote: Further they don't want to pick a fight with a huge section of the community that they probably can't win.
.The decision, which is a victory for the taxman, could affect 3000 clubs nationwide as it threatens the privileged tax status of the clubs industry.
"We are closely examining the ruling in regard to Souths Juniors and it potential to create a worrying precedent for more than 3000 sporting clubs across Australia," Clubs Australia chief David Costello told the newspaper
by doggies4eva » Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:14 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |