by Aerie » Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:47 pm
by Aerie » Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:55 pm
by MightyEagles » Thu Jun 01, 2006 9:38 pm
by Dog_ger » Thu Jun 01, 2006 9:56 pm
by eaglehaslanded » Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:25 pm
MightyEagles wrote:During the news, they said that Skipworth wasn't playing for Adelaide, so that would mean that he would be an in for the Eagles, not an out.![]()
by eaglehaslanded » Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:30 pm
by RM » Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:48 pm
eaglehaslanded wrote:Should be a crackerjack game. Both sides look really good on paper. Surely Gill can't be ready to play this week. Should be a huge crowd for what would be close to the match of the year so far. My tip the Eagles by about 4 goals.
by spell_check » Thu Jun 01, 2006 11:05 pm
by eaglehaslanded » Thu Jun 01, 2006 11:41 pm
spell_check wrote:The forecast is for a light shower or two.
I don't think the Eagles can win regardless of the weather.
by spell_check » Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:10 am
eaglehaslanded wrote:spell_check wrote:The forecast is for a light shower or two.
I don't think the Eagles can win regardless of the weather.
Jumping off the Eags already. Very disappointing spelly.
by Mickyj » Fri Jun 02, 2006 7:57 am
RM wrote:eaglehaslanded wrote:Should be a crackerjack game. Both sides look really good on paper. Surely Gill can't be ready to play this week. Should be a huge crowd for what would be close to the match of the year so far. My tip the Eagles by about 4 goals.
What would you know about Gill. You are lucky North have "held back" Hargy, White and others for extra recovery.
Its going to piss down and they will get 2500 and 2000 of them will be North fans.
by rod_rooster » Fri Jun 02, 2006 10:27 am
Mickyj wrote:RM wrote:eaglehaslanded wrote:Should be a crackerjack game. Both sides look really good on paper. Surely Gill can't be ready to play this week. Should be a huge crowd for what would be close to the match of the year so far. My tip the Eagles by about 4 goals.
What would you know about Gill. You are lucky North have "held back" Hargy, White and others for extra recovery.
Its going to piss down and they will get 2500 and 2000 of them will be North fans.
RM Grocke will be dissappointed that HARGY is not in mate he kicked five goals on him last time
by Dissident » Fri Jun 02, 2006 11:13 am
RM wrote:What would you know about Gill.
by Mickyj » Fri Jun 02, 2006 11:28 am
rod_rooster wrote:Mickyj wrote:RM wrote:eaglehaslanded wrote:Should be a crackerjack game. Both sides look really good on paper. Surely Gill can't be ready to play this week. Should be a huge crowd for what would be close to the match of the year so far. My tip the Eagles by about 4 goals.
What would you know about Gill. You are lucky North have "held back" Hargy, White and others for extra recovery.
Its going to piss down and they will get 2500 and 2000 of them will be North fans.
RM Grocke will be dissappointed that HARGY is not in mate he kicked five goals on him last time
Was a good lesson for Jars that Mickyj. He realised beyond any doubt that Hargs is never going to be a defender. If Grocke can kick 5 goals on him imagine what a good player would do
by RM » Fri Jun 02, 2006 1:57 pm
Dissident wrote:RM wrote:What would you know about Gill.
Awfully defensive for something that wasn't even an attack ?
by Sheik Yerbouti » Fri Jun 02, 2006 2:07 pm
Borat wrote:Good to see Luke Ivens is available this week.
by Blue Boy » Fri Jun 02, 2006 3:20 pm
eaglehaslanded wrote:MightyEagles wrote:During the news, they said that Skipworth wasn't playing for Adelaide, so that would mean that he would be an in for the Eagles, not an out.![]()
Skipworth is listed as an emergency for the Crows so there is every possibility that he may play for the crows so therefore he is not really an in or an out at this stage. Only time will tell. Will know definately tomorrow night.
by Dissident » Fri Jun 02, 2006 3:50 pm
RM wrote:Dissident wrote:RM wrote:What would you know about Gill.
Awfully defensive for something that wasn't even an attack ?
Not defensive at all Dissident. I was asking what would he know about Gill? Hmm, that's what it says doesnt it????
I know it wasnt an attack, if it was I would have a crack back. Bit sensitive are we!
by Mickyj » Fri Jun 02, 2006 4:00 pm
Dissident wrote:RM wrote:Dissident wrote:RM wrote:What would you know about Gill.
Awfully defensive for something that wasn't even an attack ?
Not defensive at all Dissident. I was asking what would he know about Gill? Hmm, that's what it says doesnt it????
I know it wasnt an attack, if it was I would have a crack back. Bit sensitive are we!
Sorry RM - just came across that way. Usually in conversation if someone says something and another person says "What would you know about ____", it's almost rude/condesending.
Apologies if you're not rude and condesending
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |