































by am Bays » Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:31 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:36 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Wedgie how much did you enjoy typing the word "belting' when entering the title to this thread......![]()
by Ecky » Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:45 pm
Wedgie wrote:In the battle of the ruckman I thought Clarke came 3rd or 4th after O'Hara (1st) and Kirk (2nd)
by Wedgie » Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:52 pm
Ecky wrote:Wedgie wrote:In the battle of the ruckman I thought Clarke came 3rd or 4th after O'Hara (1st) and Kirk (2nd)
Fair enough given that Clarke only had 65 hitouts and 18 possessions to O'Hara's 10 hitouts and 8 possessions...
(although admittedly not all of his hitouts were effective)
by am Bays » Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:55 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Can someone tell me why isn't McConnell trying to punch when he is fourth man up in a pack??? Especially when we are in prime position front and square!!!!
by Ecky » Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:58 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:59 pm
by Ecky » Sat Jul 01, 2006 10:00 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Jul 01, 2006 10:02 pm
Ecky wrote:All I will say is watch the video of the game, Wedgie, and then let me know if you still disagree.
and note: you can't use the stats in the paper tomorrow as evidence that the 65 figure is incorrect - they only record effective hitouts so naturally their total will be lower.
by Ecky » Sat Jul 01, 2006 10:08 pm
Wedgie wrote:IMHO I thought Clarke jumped too early so if he did tap it it went nowhere but when O'Hara or Wakelin tapped it it went straight down a North players throat.
by spell_check » Sat Jul 01, 2006 10:30 pm
by spell_check » Sat Jul 01, 2006 10:33 pm
by RM » Sat Jul 01, 2006 10:56 pm
by Rushby Hinds » Sat Jul 01, 2006 10:56 pm
Wedgie wrote:Ecky wrote:All I will say is watch the video of the game, Wedgie, and then let me know if you still disagree.
and note: you can't use the stats in the paper tomorrow as evidence that the 65 figure is incorrect - they only record effective hitouts so naturally their total will be lower.
As I said mate I don't need to see a video to know you're right and I'm wrong BUT I will be interested to view the Sunday Mail stats tomorrow.
IMHO I thought Clarke jumped too early so if he did tap it it went nowhere but when O'Hara or Wakelin tapped it it went straight down a North players throat.
I'm not being club biased either as I thought Kirky was great today but he did play most of his time up forward (I think?)
by Wedgie » Sat Jul 01, 2006 11:03 pm
Borat wrote:Wedgie, you Doofus....
Kirky played in DEFENCE all day
+ Clarke had 50 tap outs by 3/4 time....
I think he went ok...
by Rushby Hinds » Sat Jul 01, 2006 11:10 pm
Wedgie wrote:Borat wrote:Wedgie, you Doofus....
Kirky played in DEFENCE all day
+ Clarke had 50 tap outs by 3/4 time....
I think he went ok...
faark, I think I was at the wrong game!
(I think the real problem was I was sober today!)
PS Wherever the hell Kirk was I thought he did OK today but who knows with my crappy analysis/thoughts on a game!
by Wedgie » Sat Jul 01, 2006 11:17 pm
Borat wrote:Hey Wedgie, you weren't the only one. We had the pleasure of the company of injured reserves star ruckman Pumpa with us all day. Is 17, and tall, and was wearing his full "civilian" clothes when standing with us.
About 3 minutes into the half time break, the North "cheer squad" came over for a chat.
"HEY KIRKY, I've BEEN GIVING IT TO YOU ALL DAY, G'DAY MATE"
If it was Kirky, how he had showered, changed and came to the dug out in 3 minutes hadn't been considered.
We tried to tell him it wasn't Kirky, but he didn't believe us...
by Aerie » Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:48 am
Wedgie wrote:
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |