by Dutchy » Thu May 12, 2016 9:14 pm
by PhilH » Thu May 12, 2016 10:06 pm
by wedgetail » Thu May 12, 2016 10:34 pm
by The Dark Knight » Thu May 12, 2016 11:02 pm
wedgetail wrote:How many Power listed players in the reserves this week?
by johntheclaret » Fri May 13, 2016 7:11 am
The Dark Knight wrote:wedgetail wrote:How many Power listed players in the reserves this week?
9
by Reddeer » Sat May 14, 2016 8:10 pm
by amber_fluid » Sat May 14, 2016 8:46 pm
by Spargo » Sat May 14, 2016 9:29 pm
Reddeer wrote:One umpire pretty cluey. Reports a port player for kicking and then appears to be letting the port player still take his kick.
Fortunately there was another umpire with a bit of nouse and ran in to amend the situation. be interesting to see what rating that umpire gets from the
report on his performance. In view of the umpiring standards in the SANFL this season probably will get A+
by wedgetail » Sat May 14, 2016 9:43 pm
by amber_fluid » Sat May 14, 2016 9:51 pm
wedgetail wrote:Eags looked a lot better in the second half today and if not for poor finishing would have won by 10 goals.
Gafney continues to impress, Goldsworthy's best game for the year as was Hall and Petrenko would have picked up votes again.
The Power reserves, reserves were totally uncompetitive, beaten by 120 points. Is there a point to having them?
by goddy11 » Sat May 14, 2016 11:55 pm
Reddeer wrote:One umpire pretty cluey. Reports a port player for kicking and then appears to be letting the port player still take his kick.
Fortunately there was another umpire with a bit of nouse and ran in to amend the situation. be interesting to see what rating that umpire gets from the
report on his performance. In view of the umpiring standards in the SANFL this season probably will get A+
by Spargo » Sun May 15, 2016 12:00 am
goddy11 wrote:Reddeer wrote:One umpire pretty cluey. Reports a port player for kicking and then appears to be letting the port player still take his kick.
Fortunately there was another umpire with a bit of nouse and ran in to amend the situation. be interesting to see what rating that umpire gets from the
report on his performance. In view of the umpiring standards in the SANFL this season probably will get A+
This looked funny. The ump running in from center had to tell the ump on the spot that he needs to reverse his decision.
Agreed on umpiring standards. SANFL umps are superior to AFL. More common sense and the don't make themselves the center of the game.
by Mickyj » Sun May 15, 2016 7:18 am
Spargo wrote:goddy11 wrote:Reddeer wrote:One umpire pretty cluey. Reports a port player for kicking and then appears to be letting the port player still take his kick.
Fortunately there was another umpire with a bit of nouse and ran in to amend the situation. be interesting to see what rating that umpire gets from the
report on his performance. In view of the umpiring standards in the SANFL this season probably will get A+
This looked funny. The ump running in from center had to tell the ump on the spot that he needs to reverse his decision.
Agreed on umpiring standards. SANFL umps are superior to AFL. More common sense and the don't make themselves the center of the game.
Did someone kick someone though???
by Reddeer » Sun May 15, 2016 1:26 pm
Spargo wrote:goddy11 wrote:Reddeer wrote:One umpire pretty cluey. Reports a port player for kicking and then appears to be letting the port player still take his kick.
Fortunately there was another umpire with a bit of nouse and ran in to amend the situation. be interesting to see what rating that umpire gets from the
report on his performance. In view of the umpiring standards in the SANFL this season probably will get A+
This looked funny. The ump running in from center had to tell the ump on the spot that he needs to reverse his decision.
Agreed on umpiring standards. SANFL umps are superior to AFL. More common sense and the don't make themselves the center of the game.
Did someone kick someone though???
by Gozu » Sun May 15, 2016 1:33 pm
by Reddeer » Sun May 15, 2016 5:15 pm
by Mickyj » Sun May 15, 2016 6:30 pm
Reddeer wrote:Sliding Scale
Port thirds downed by 122
Port seconds downed by 39
Port firsts downed by 2
Disappointing for their fans who will no doubt start disappearing
by Booney » Mon May 16, 2016 3:15 pm
by Mickyj » Mon May 16, 2016 4:56 pm
Booney wrote:The umpire over seeing the Dougal Howard report was so far out of his depth. He was about to let Howard take the kick, despite having reported him moments earlier, if not for the experienced umpire it would have been farcical.
Howard offered a one match ban, a $200 fine and reprimand for an early guilty plea.
Me, I say give them the $200 and get away before they change their minds!
by stan » Mon May 16, 2016 5:46 pm
Booney wrote:The umpire over seeing the Dougal Howard report was so far out of his depth. He was about to let Howard take the kick, despite having reported him moments earlier, if not for the experienced umpire it would have been farcical.
Howard offered a one match ban, a $200 fine and reprimand for an early guilty plea.
Me, I say give them the $200 and get away before they change their minds!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |