Norwood vs Port Trial

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Post a reply

Norwood vs Port Trial

Postby Thiele » Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:32 pm

Port 7.2
Norwood 1.4
James Ezard Joint 2009 Magarey Medalist

Personal views only not views of the West Adelaide Footy Club or Bedford Indstries
User avatar
Thiele
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28406
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: The wolf packs den
Has liked: 183 times
Been liked: 118 times
Top

Postby Wedgie » Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:35 pm

Time for Norwood to start again and regroup for 2008. :wink:
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga
Top

Postby Thiele » Fri Mar 09, 2007 9:05 pm

Port 10.6
Norwood 3.6 at half time scores
from 5aa
James Ezard Joint 2009 Magarey Medalist

Personal views only not views of the West Adelaide Footy Club or Bedford Indstries
User avatar
Thiele
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28406
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: The wolf packs den
Has liked: 183 times
Been liked: 118 times
Top

Postby Thiele » Fri Mar 09, 2007 9:56 pm

Into the final quater

Norwood 10.13
Port 12.7
James Ezard Joint 2009 Magarey Medalist

Personal views only not views of the West Adelaide Footy Club or Bedford Indstries
User avatar
Thiele
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28406
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: The wolf packs den
Has liked: 183 times
Been liked: 118 times
Top

Postby Wedgie » Fri Mar 09, 2007 9:57 pm

Port have brought the ressies on.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga
Top

Postby NFC » Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:23 pm

Spewing! I had to leave early!!!

Here come the Legs! :twisted:
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Top

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:24 pm

Wedgie wrote:Port have brought the ressies on.


Part of their re-grouping for 2008 programme?
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Top

Postby stampy » Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:27 pm

are you sure you didnt leave early cos you could see a floggin' coming on?
Go The Tiges!!!
stampy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9088
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:21 pm
Location: at church asking for divine intervention
Has liked: 78 times
Been liked: 379 times
Grassroots Team: Christies Beach
Top

Postby NFC » Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:30 pm

stampy wrote:are you sure you didnt leave early cos you could see a floggin' coming on?

I left at 3/4 time, and Norwood were improving. 1st quarter was garbage, next two very competitive. We were getting better as the game wore on.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Top

Postby Thiele » Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:35 pm

Final Scores

Norwood 11 14
Port 14 9
James Ezard Joint 2009 Magarey Medalist

Personal views only not views of the West Adelaide Footy Club or Bedford Indstries
User avatar
Thiele
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28406
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: The wolf packs den
Has liked: 183 times
Been liked: 118 times
Top

Postby NFC » Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:35 pm

Port 14. 9 (93)
Norwood 11. 14 (80)

We'll get 'em when it matters! :twisted:
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Top

Postby Macca19 » Fri Mar 09, 2007 11:33 pm

keep dreaming.

Good to start the year off well.
Macca19
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1961
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:54 pm
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 10 times
Grassroots Team: Ports
Top

Postby sturt1 » Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:18 am

It did seem like port were going to win by alot more after the start they had, still it was a good win to win at the parade
But it was more than a victory for Greece. It was a stirring example to free people throughout the world of what a few brave men can accomplish once they refuse to submit to tyranny.
sturt1
Under 18s
 
Posts: 719
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 7:29 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Top

Postby fester69 » Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:14 am

In no way did it affect the resuly of the game but the new "hands in the back" rule is a farce! Both sides benefited and a new tactic would be to lead, stop, get touched and gain a free! Footy as we know and love it is getting too technical IMHO!
User avatar
fester69
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1072
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 6:09 pm
Has liked: 18 times
Been liked: 32 times
Grassroots Team: Morphettville Park
Top

Postby Ian » Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:34 am

Why does the SANFL have to bow to every thing the GayFL does?
North Adelaide F C : Champions of Aust 1972 : Premiers 1900, 02, 05, 20, 30, 31, 49, 52, 60, 71, 72, 87, 91
User avatar
Ian
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 11443
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:25 pm
Has liked: 312 times
Been liked: 93 times
Grassroots Team: Lockleys
Top

Postby Hondo » Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:46 am

Ian wrote:Why does the SANFL have to bow to every thing the GayFL does?


KG & Cornsey had the head of SANFL umpires on a few weeks ago and he said that the SANFL was free to follow or not. However he felt strongly that the new interpretation was a good move in the long run. On other rule changes such as the 20m mimimum kick (trialled in the NAB cup), he said the SANFL had no intention of even looking at.
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times
Top

Postby Mr66 » Sat Mar 10, 2007 2:11 pm

Ian wrote:Why does the SANFL have to bow to every thing the GayFL does?


Unfortunately yes, EVERY football league has to bow to the thousand year reich these days :prayer:
If one person does it, it's insanity. If millions do it, it's religion.

http://www.beyondblue.org.au
User avatar
Mr66
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4392
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 7:08 pm
Location: Where the Streets Have No Name
Has liked: 12 times
Been liked: 12 times
Top

Postby RoosterMarty » Sat Mar 10, 2007 4:25 pm

Oh dear... I was hoping the SANFL wouldn't bring in this new rule, it is a disgrace.
User avatar
RoosterMarty
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6524
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 9:30 pm
Location: Adelaide (near Prospect Oval)
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 0 time
Top

Postby Rik E Boy » Sat Mar 10, 2007 11:49 pm

NFC wrote:Port 14. 9 (93)
Norwood 11. 14 (80)

We'll get 'em when it matters! :twisted:


Look at that improvement from the first match we played. Go the Legs! :wink:

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28588
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times
Top

Postby johntheclaret » Sun Mar 11, 2007 12:42 am

fester69 wrote:In no way did it affect the resuly of the game but the new "hands in the back" rule is a farce! Both sides benefited and a new tactic would be to lead, stop, get touched and gain a free! Footy as we know and love it is getting too technical IMHO!


Won't be long before Auzzie Rules is a non contact sport. Please god, never let it get as boring as English soccer :roll:
johntheclaret
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13277
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:39 am
Has liked: 409 times
Been liked: 580 times
Top
Next
Post a reply
Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Advertisements by Advertisement Management