by eddie-eagle » Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:23 pm
by once_were_warriors » Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:38 pm
by smac » Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:41 pm
by Blue Boy » Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:02 pm
by Cambridge Clarrie » Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:17 pm
by am Bays » Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:19 pm
by Cambridge Clarrie » Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:25 pm
by am Bays » Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:30 pm
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:I'm simply saying that he's let his team mates down. Trust me if Chambers did this I'd be the first to say that I didn't want him inthe team.
Surely you don't condone this behaviour Tassie.
by mal » Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:42 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:53 pm
by JK » Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:54 pm
mal wrote:Hargs can go to Adelaide Oval in September and have a beer at the footy
and watch CD/ST/NA/EG/GL play in the finals.
by Cambridge Clarrie » Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:56 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:its just a pity that JARS didnt do the same thing to the other blokes that were with Hargs.............
by Coorong » Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:01 pm
eddie-eagle wrote:I'm in melb at the moment and Jars is a regular AFL commentator broadcasting games from AAMI into melbourne on SEN 1116 AM.
Prematch (West Coke vs Chocko's Chokers) his co commentators (KB & others) were talking up his aspirations for the melbourne job (LOL) and saying how Melbourne would not lack discipline when he got the job as he sacked his clubs leading goalkicker for the last five years.
Jars then went on to say, "yes his name is Daniel Hargraves, he was found to be drinking at the casino at 7 am in the week before our prelim final last year. Once that got back to me that was his last game at the club and the reason for his sacking"
This may be common knowledge to some fans, but was the first time I heard this in the public arena.
I don't think rooster fans can come on here and express annoyance at how bad a decision it was, based on the facts described by Jars.
by Booney » Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:17 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Gee I'm looking forward to seeing the council(s) for the defence case later tonight....
by Rushby Hinds » Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:27 pm
eddie-eagle wrote:.
Jars then went on to say, "yes his name is Daniel Hargraves, he was found to be drinking at the casino at 7 am in the week before our prelim final last year. Once that got back to me that was his last game at the club and the reason for his sacking"
by rod_rooster » Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:34 pm
Rushby Hinds wrote:eddie-eagle wrote:.
Jars then went on to say, "yes his name is Daniel Hargraves, he was found to be drinking at the casino at 7 am in the week before our prelim final last year. Once that got back to me that was his last game at the club and the reason for his sacking"
So is it correct that ANJ was that outraged that he let him keep playing for as long as North were in the finals?
by Cambridge Clarrie » Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:37 pm
by Hondo » Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:48 pm
Blue Boy wrote::shock:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I am a jars fan - but I cant understand what is to gain from that !!!
by sturt1 » Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:15 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:its just a pity that JARS didnt do the same thing to the other blokes that were with Hargs.............
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |