Mr Irate wrote:Cheers....colours, or pushing a shopping trolley with a couple of kids in it ?
Nah she was ugly.....
by Dirko » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:23 pm
Mr Irate wrote:Cheers....colours, or pushing a shopping trolley with a couple of kids in it ?
by dogs01 » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:24 pm
bulldogproud wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Ok so I can't ask questions?
I've asked WTF is he doing?
and you be the judge.
Well thankfully noone on this site will be the judge it will be the SANFL tribunal if it gets that far.
Tassie, I may be clutching at short straws here but could it be said that he was trying to shake the ball free from Rudolph's clutches?
by bayman » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:24 pm
by baysman » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:31 pm
by purch » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:32 pm
Mr Irate wrote:Give it another couple of hours and the whole 'Dogs team will be on report
by mal » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:33 pm
by baysman » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:33 pm
by Mr Irate » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:38 pm
purch wrote:Mr Irate wrote:Give it another couple of hours and the whole 'Dogs team will be on report
Reports? Nah...assault charges perhaps? I don't know what the situation was but from what I saw there was a very young girl who ran on to the field and the bloke who was running after her could have been her father FFS. What was Gowans thinking? That was pretty ordinary and it wasn't his role....Andrew Symonds fan is he?
At the very least it was holding on* and it should have been a free kick
by joelie » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:39 pm
by purch » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:41 pm
mal wrote:SCHELL V RUDOLPH
CD barrackers are saying there was nothing wrong
GL barrackers are saying there was something wrong
Being an impartial nuetral observer these are my thoughts
Please bear in mind I admire both clubs and follow both when NW is not playing
The tackle was fierce hard and scroupously legitimate
If thats where it ended with RUDOLPH KOed then end of story
BUT
The actions of SCHELL after the initial tackle was a bit sus
Undue rough play ?
If I was on the tribunal I would site the case
My verdict not guilty in the SANFL
If it was an AwFuL tribunal hmnnnnnnnnn ......seeya in 2009
by mal » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:41 pm
by CENTURION » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:45 pm
by purch » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:50 pm
Mr Irate wrote:purch wrote:Mr Irate wrote:Give it another couple of hours and the whole 'Dogs team will be on report
Reports? Nah...assault charges perhaps? I don't know what the situation was but from what I saw there was a very young girl who ran on to the field and the bloke who was running after her could have been her father FFS. What was Gowans thinking? That was pretty ordinary and it wasn't his role....Andrew Symonds fan is he?
At the very least it was holding on* and it should have been a free kick
You need to read the earlier posts, the girl was allegedly a Centrals supporter.....I don't understand why you're using the term father........
by Mr Irate » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:52 pm
mal wrote:The turning point of the game is when CRANE missed that goal last week
One other point
If the umpires construed SCHELLS actions illegitimate should GL be awarded a free kick in the middle to start the last qtr ?
by tigersupporter » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:52 pm
by Mr Irate » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:53 pm
purch wrote:Mr Irate wrote:purch wrote:Mr Irate wrote:Give it another couple of hours and the whole 'Dogs team will be on report
Reports? Nah...assault charges perhaps? I don't know what the situation was but from what I saw there was a very young girl who ran on to the field and the bloke who was running after her could have been her father FFS. What was Gowans thinking? That was pretty ordinary and it wasn't his role....Andrew Symonds fan is he?
At the very least it was holding on* and it should have been a free kick
You need to read the earlier posts, the girl was allegedly a Centrals supporter.....I don't understand why you're using the term father........
It didn't matter who she/they supported...I only used the term father cos she was very young and he looked fat and old. They obviously knew each other. Next time I'll say Unlce or Grandad. Careless act by Gowans though. It didn't need to be done.
Actually, after thnking about it a little more, perhaps she wanted to set a flare off up a Glenelg players ass!Well done Gowans! That's the British spirit!
by CENTURION » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:57 pm
by redden whites » Sun Sep 21, 2008 11:05 pm
by zipzap » Sun Sep 21, 2008 11:10 pm
Brucetiki wrote:Pseudo wrote:I do hope for Sammy's sake that he's OK - and Mr. Schell would do well to hope he pulls up OK too.
According to Mickan when he was interviewed on the 5AA SANFL show he is fine. He also walked back to the interchange bench in the last quarter alright.
by Pseudo » Sun Sep 21, 2008 11:12 pm
CENTURION wrote:Yeah! The Gowans' are crap, just like Buckets! Isn't that what all you knob-twiddlers were sprouting about 5 or 6 weeks ago?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |