shanghaied wrote:Any idea about the size of the crowds thus far?
Crowd at Alberton? Bout 3,500?
Deserved a LOT more.
by NFC » Sat Aug 25, 2007 7:33 pm
shanghaied wrote:Any idea about the size of the crowds thus far?
by JAS » Sat Aug 25, 2007 7:36 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Aug 25, 2007 8:26 pm
Graham wrote:goraw wrote:rule out the roosters from the gf. out in the elim.
Oops, soory, I thought they were a 10 goal better side than the Eagles last week (with all the umpire bleating that was going on) not only that but they were the better side for 3 qtrs and "ONLY" lost by 3 pts. By that theory they were outplayed in 1 qtr by a team lower on the ladder. How many goals were Glenelg "gifted" today. Given they kicked 7 more goals than we kicked last week, North should only have lost by 3 goals today.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Jimmy » Sat Aug 25, 2007 9:10 pm
by johntheclaret » Sat Aug 25, 2007 9:23 pm
Graham wrote:Hows Wedgie feeling now after the "I am more confident after losing to the Eagles" statement after losing to the Eagles last week (not withstanding the 10 goals we were gifted last week). Yes, losing after dominating for 3 qtrs would make me feel confident tooHow many goals were Glenelg gifted today ??? Seeing as they kicked so many I no doubt would have thought there would have been quite a few
by Dirko » Sat Aug 25, 2007 9:25 pm
johntheclaret wrote:Graham wrote:Hows Wedgie feeling now after the "I am more confident after losing to the Eagles" statement after losing to the Eagles last week (not withstanding the 10 goals we were gifted last week). Yes, losing after dominating for 3 qtrs would make me feel confident tooHow many goals were Glenelg gifted today ??? Seeing as they kicked so many I no doubt would have thought there would have been quite a few
They were gifted a hatful today Graham. Unfortunately, it was by the North players and not the umps.
by Jimmy » Sat Aug 25, 2007 9:36 pm
by blues2002 » Sat Aug 25, 2007 10:56 pm
Wedgie wrote:[On paper North IMHO have the best team in the comp (not by much over the Dogs) but as they are so mentally insipid its irrelevent.
North will always crumble in the games that count, might as well as pack up and start working on 2008.
by Hondo » Sat Aug 25, 2007 11:13 pm
blues2002 wrote:Christ, what a fanboi u are. Wish I had a $ for every person who thought their underforming team was the best but - errrrr BUT ...
... ripped off by umpires
... mentally insipid
... torn apart by club infighting
... (insert own sad ass excuse here...)
by blues2002 » Sat Aug 25, 2007 11:32 pm
hondo71 wrote:blues2002 wrote:Christ, what a fanboi u are. Wish I had a $ for every person who thought their underforming team was the best but - errrrr BUT ...
... ripped off by umpires
... mentally insipid
... torn apart by club infighting
... (insert own sad ass excuse here...)
I think the comments from some North supporters are public commentary on Jars' coaching, rightly or wrongly, rather than being excuses necessarially
by Pseudo » Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:39 am
blues2002 wrote: maybe someone alse can do the the Honor of getting flag....
by Aerie » Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:46 am
Wedgie wrote:Graham wrote:goraw wrote:rule out the roosters from the gf. out in the elim.
Oops, soory, I thought they were a 10 goal better side than the Eagles last week (with all the umpire bleating that was going on) not only that but they were the better side for 3 qtrs and "ONLY" lost by 3 pts. By that theory they were outplayed in 1 qtr by a team lower on the ladder. How many goals were Glenelg "gifted" today. Given they kicked 7 more goals than we kicked last week, North should only have lost by 3 goals today.
Glenelg weren't gifted any goals today, in fact North had the better of the umpiring IMHO, I always call it straight down the line.
In fairness, North were probably a 5 goal better side than the Eagles last week IMHO, not 10.
On paper North IMHO have the best team in the comp (not by much over the Dogs) but as they are so mentally insipid its irrelevent.
North will always crumble in the games that count, might as well as pack up and start working on 2008.
by spell_check » Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:47 am
Aerie wrote:Wedgie wrote:Graham wrote:goraw wrote:rule out the roosters from the gf. out in the elim.
Oops, soory, I thought they were a 10 goal better side than the Eagles last week (with all the umpire bleating that was going on) not only that but they were the better side for 3 qtrs and "ONLY" lost by 3 pts. By that theory they were outplayed in 1 qtr by a team lower on the ladder. How many goals were Glenelg "gifted" today. Given they kicked 7 more goals than we kicked last week, North should only have lost by 3 goals today.
Glenelg weren't gifted any goals today, in fact North had the better of the umpiring IMHO, I always call it straight down the line.
In fairness, North were probably a 5 goal better side than the Eagles last week IMHO, not 10.
On paper North IMHO have the best team in the comp (not by much over the Dogs) but as they are so mentally insipid its irrelevent.
North will always crumble in the games that count, might as well as pack up and start working on 2008.
What does the 'H' stand for in IMHO?
by spell_check » Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:51 am
GWW wrote:I always thought it was "honest".
by Aerie » Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:53 am
spell_check wrote:Aerie wrote:Wedgie wrote:Graham wrote:
Oops, soory, I thought they were a 10 goal better side than the Eagles last week (with all the umpire bleating that was going on) not only that but they were the better side for 3 qtrs and "ONLY" lost by 3 pts. By that theory they were outplayed in 1 qtr by a team lower on the ladder. How many goals were Glenelg "gifted" today. Given they kicked 7 more goals than we kicked last week, North should only have lost by 3 goals today.
Glenelg weren't gifted any goals today, in fact North had the better of the umpiring IMHO, I always call it straight down the line.
In fairness, North were probably a 5 goal better side than the Eagles last week IMHO, not 10.
On paper North IMHO have the best team in the comp (not by much over the Dogs) but as they are so mentally insipid its irrelevent.
North will always crumble in the games that count, might as well as pack up and start working on 2008.
What does the 'H' stand for in IMHO?
Humble, I think.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |