North v Glenelg Rd 5 2006

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Postby RustyCage » Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:59 pm

spell_check wrote:So far the Eagles have the honour of restricting North to it's lowest score so far - 18.14 (122). This is an amazing stat that North have kicked more than this 3 times in a row.


Will be interesting to see how they go against Port who only let through 69 points per game so far this year.
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 15303
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 1269 times
Been liked: 937 times

Postby - » Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:05 pm

i thought 36 of the 4600 were glenelg supporters
Never give a sucker an even break

Nor ban a user for an acceptable topic of discussion.

"Baby on board". Why dont you put a sign on ur car saying "adult on board" or "car stereo in use"?
-
Reserves
 
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:12 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby RM » Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:08 pm

Wedgie wrote:
John_Fidge wrote:Hey Wedgie, I was in the outer and the amount of North fans compared to Glenelg was amazing. You have great support, I've gotta give you that.


It was the only area of the ground where I didn't get to at all and I hoped/assumed there's be a good sprinkle of North fans out there.


North fans outnumbered Bay fans 25-1 in the very occupied outer Wedgie.

North had many fans there today.

Standing in the outer , we heard a big roar from the snouts hill and grandstand when the Bays got a goal, but when north got a goal is was all around the ground.

Dont sell North short as there were plenty more Roosters there.
RM
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 301
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:13 pm
Location: Near Grand North, The Northern Tavern and Prospect Oval. All belong to the Mighty NAFC.
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 5 times
Grassroots Team: Lincoln South

Postby Dog_ger » Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:10 pm

Top game...! Roosters are good...! How Good..? Dog's this week...! Dogs by 10 points...! Ha...!

Shake in your boots, People....! :lol: :lol: :lol:
Smile :)

It's only Money $$$ :)

What is happening to our SANFL guys...
User avatar
Dog_ger
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:25 pm
Location: Salisbury Downs
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 19 times

Postby Rushby Hinds » Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:42 pm

RoosterMarty wrote:
Borat i thought your midfield was much better than ours, and wasnt there some new bloke "the most courageous in the league" who was supposed to smash the Roosters around???


!


Yep, your midfield smashed us, but you obviously weren't watching Tommy Logan.

He would have to be the hardest player at the ball in the league, and today was crashing the packs all day.
User avatar
Rushby Hinds
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1520
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 9:40 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Rushby Hinds » Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:49 pm

I saw a bloke wearing checkered shoes and a jumper today, man, how silly did he look.

Dunno who he was barracking for, he was really quiet and to frightened to show any team colours.
User avatar
Rushby Hinds
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1520
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 9:40 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:54 pm

Borat wrote:
RoosterMarty wrote:
Borat i thought your midfield was much better than ours, and wasnt there some new bloke "the most courageous in the league" who was supposed to smash the Roosters around???


!


Yep, your midfield smashed us, but you obviously weren't watching Tommy Logan.

He would have to be the hardest player at the ball in the league, and today was crashing the packs all day.


Tommy Logan is an AFL player waiting to happen.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Ecky » Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:55 pm

Wedgie wrote:BTW for those wondering how the GF replay went, North's reserves beat the previously undefeated Glenelg by 7pts after having a 6 or 7 goal lead earlier, I was glad that game didn't go much longer!


You were lucky that the game had to be finished by 2:10pm, regardless of how much time was remaining. Allegedly there was still a couple minutes of play left at this stage today when the siren sounded.

With the new time on rules, quarters are now going longer, and Reserves games are now often reaching that 2:10pm deadline. The SANFL really needs to start the reserves games earlier... 5 mins earlier to 11:30am would make logical sense.
Last edited by Ecky on Mon May 01, 2006 12:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Ecky
2022 SA Footy Punter of the Year
 
 
Posts: 2736
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:26 am
Location: Wherever the stats are
Has liked: 12 times
Been liked: 78 times
Grassroots Team: Adelaide Lutheran

Postby spell_check » Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:57 pm

Ecky wrote:
Wedgie wrote:BTW for those wondering how the GF replay went, North's reserves beat the previously undefeated Glenelg by 7pts after having a 6 or 7 goal lead earlier, I was glad that game didn't go much longer!


You were lucky that the game had to be finished by 2:10pm, regardless of how much time was remaining. Allegedly there was still a couple minutes of play left at this stage.

With the new time on rules, quarters are now going longer, and Reserves games are now often reaching that 2:10pm deadline. The SANFL really needs to start the reserves games earlier... 5 mins earlier to 11:30am would make logical sense.


They should have already started games earlier before this season, as it was happening more often than just the Reserves GF. Not sure why the SANFL don't realise this.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Postby drebin » Mon May 01, 2006 12:11 am

Ecky wrote:
Wedgie wrote:BTW for those wondering how the GF replay went, North's reserves beat the previously undefeated Glenelg by 7pts after having a 6 or 7 goal lead earlier, I was glad that game didn't go much longer!


You were lucky that the game had to be finished by 2:10pm, regardless of how much time was remaining. Allegedly there was still a couple minutes of play left at this stage when the siren sounded.

With the new time on rules, quarters are now going longer, and Reserves games are now often reaching that 2:10pm deadline. The SANFL really needs to start the reserves games earlier... 5 mins earlier to 11:30am would make logical sense.


Good point ecky - I made said exactly the same point to a few mates today as it was unfolding. North have been the "winners" on a few occasions in recent years of the 2.10 cut off (I think it's in our game plan! :wink: ) including I think the GF from last year which finished a "tad" early IMO! A 15 minute earlier start for the ressies wouldn't kill anyone would it?
drebin
 

Postby - » Mon May 01, 2006 12:35 pm

Borat wrote:I saw a bloke wearing checkered shoes and a jumper today, man, how silly did he look.

Dunno who he was barracking for, he was really quiet and to frightened to show any team colours.


I wore checkered shoes and a jumper but had a scarf on.
Never give a sucker an even break

Nor ban a user for an acceptable topic of discussion.

"Baby on board". Why dont you put a sign on ur car saying "adult on board" or "car stereo in use"?
-
Reserves
 
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:12 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 10 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |