How about this one...
the light's at the Parade are rubbish! This is the best pic I could come up with of the Doggies walking off after a triumphant win!


by Dogwatcher » Sun May 13, 2007 9:15 pm
by Wedgie » Sun May 13, 2007 9:20 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:the light's at the Parade are rubbish!
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Dogwatcher » Sun May 13, 2007 9:25 pm
by Dogwatcher » Sun May 13, 2007 10:17 pm
by smac » Mon May 14, 2007 9:43 am
But on Saturday nights it is at Elizabeth and not against Norwood. If you had read all of the article you would understand his point.Wedgie wrote:I like how Kris Grant blamed the SANFL for having it as a night match, does he think it only gets dark on Fridays and not Saturdays at Elizabeth?
He couldn't be serious surely?
by JK » Mon May 14, 2007 11:50 am
by Grahaml » Mon May 14, 2007 12:44 pm
by Jar Man Out » Mon May 14, 2007 1:36 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:As mentioned above, so much to read and comment on ... Sorry I missed you SMAC, will make a point of seeking you out at Hamra next month mate ... My take on it all:
The Game - I think GrahamL summed it up the best ... Fair dinkum, that last quarter was as awesome a performance as I can recall seeing ... IF the game had another 10 minutes in it I reckon the Dogs would have kicked another 10 goals, they were just unstoppable, a truly GREAT team & club which has all of this punters respect.
The Umpires - The same as always, ordinary to say the least, and no bias there as I actually think Centrals copped the rougher end of the stick, particularly the free kick to Bartemucci in the 2nd quarter (which you could see all the way from Coopers Hill was ridiculously soft) ... And also a throw in the 3rd quarter which allowed the Legs to run into an open goal, was that obvious it drew laughter left, right and centre.
Coopers Hill - The violent behaviour was unnaceptable and not something I can recall seeing there before ... Seeing blokes kick people on the ground while someone else is punching them in the back of the head is BS, how blokes can feel manly for behaving like that is beyond me, it's cowardice of the highest order - I don't recall seeing either teams colours on any of these blokes, so I'm not villifying either team.
As for stories of violence on Coopers Hill, I've not witnessed any in years and I'm there every home game ... I had a few Leg's fans doing some recruiting for trouble in a game last year and told them to go f*** themselves, I don't give a sh!t who barracks for whom, violent behaviour at the footy is unacceptable and no SANFL fans should be supportive of these people!
Norwood v Central Games - I think night games just simply have to be out of the question, which means unfortunately a minority has cocked up an enjoyable night out for the majority!
Security - I've had concerns about this before and not just at Norwood ... Security is piss weak, and generally always arrives once a situation has been diffused, the league need to change companies or something because these guys as a group are ordinary and ineffective.
Not sure if any of them read this site, but big up's to the young Centrals lads behind us on the hill who were piss funny all night despite having to put up with plenty of barbs from a clearly intoxicated Legs man ... These boys were/are a credit to the CDFC!
by CENTURION » Mon May 14, 2007 2:45 pm
by topsywaldron » Mon May 14, 2007 3:27 pm
CENTURION wrote:It wouldn't have mattered if there was no alcohol available-for some reason, there seems to be this real aggro & intense dislike for each other, on & off the field!
by doggies4eva » Mon May 14, 2007 3:43 pm
topsywaldron wrote:CENTURION wrote:It wouldn't have mattered if there was no alcohol available-for some reason, there seems to be this real aggro & intense dislike for each other, on & off the field!
God knows why. You left us in the dust years ago.
I blame Golden Dynasty!
by JK » Mon May 14, 2007 4:04 pm
doggies4eva wrote:topsywaldron wrote:CENTURION wrote:It wouldn't have mattered if there was no alcohol available-for some reason, there seems to be this real aggro & intense dislike for each other, on & off the field!
God knows why. You left us in the dust years ago.
I blame Golden Dynasty!
I seem to recall it going back to the game at Norwood when Gilbert McAdam was playing for us - after he had won the Magery. There was an all in players brawl resulting in Gilbert leaving the field before the ball was even bounced to get stiches in his head.
The crowd got pretty upset and fights broke out around the ground amongst the spectators. Until then I don't remember any real problems but since then every year there seems to be a few that carry on the tradition.
by Dogwatcher » Mon May 14, 2007 4:08 pm
by doggies4eva » Mon May 14, 2007 4:10 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:doggies4eva wrote:topsywaldron wrote:CENTURION wrote:It wouldn't have mattered if there was no alcohol available-for some reason, there seems to be this real aggro & intense dislike for each other, on & off the field!
God knows why. You left us in the dust years ago.
I blame Golden Dynasty!
I seem to recall it going back to the game at Norwood when Gilbert McAdam was playing for us - after he had won the Magery. There was an all in players brawl resulting in Gilbert leaving the field before the ball was even bounced to get stiches in his head.
The crowd got pretty upset and fights broke out around the ground amongst the spectators. Until then I don't remember any real problems but since then every year there seems to be a few that carry on the tradition.
Very good point D4, I'd been wondering if the problem stemmed back to that fateful day in 1988 myself
by JK » Mon May 14, 2007 4:26 pm
by Dogwatcher » Mon May 14, 2007 4:35 pm
by JK » Mon May 14, 2007 4:40 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:CP - if you read my post again, you'll notice I was referring to the incident in terms of the Tisers' coverage.
I also agree that it's pretty ordinary sort of incident to occur and unecessary.
However, in terms of fights, it was no better, no bigger and no worse than any that would've taken place at nightclubs/pubs over the weekend. Why weren't they reported in such a way? One person injured in that way - doesn't headlines make. A brawl involving Centrals supporters - a headline does make.
Interestingly Channel 9s Tom Chadwick was at the game Friday night (he got a send-off from the Hill as he left) and yet, as far as I'm aware Nine didn't report it. If it wasn't reported by a sports journo when he was actually on the scene, you might have to wonder about the 'story factor'.
Also, to the Centrals fans giving him stick for being a Norwood supporter, I'm pretty sure he's a Westies man. He played there, not for Norwood, as far as I know.
by Dogwatcher » Mon May 14, 2007 4:44 pm
by JK » Mon May 14, 2007 4:46 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:It wasn't blaming Centrals supporters perse, but if it hadn't involved Centrals supporters it wouldn't have rated a mention.
I'm sure we can all account for fights we've seen at the footy that haven't had huge headlines, making something out of nothing.
And why should we be used to those sort of things at nightclubs/pubs and not footy? Alcohol. Passions firing in support....we should expect it as much as we do at those sort of places.
by Brucetiki » Mon May 14, 2007 6:12 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |