
by stampy » Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:02 pm
by Dutchy » Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:27 pm
stampy wrote:nah i wasnt there dutchy old son, when we both work all week and with kids to attend to sometimes attending matches isnt no.1 priority and as for travelling from down south to the parade on a cold winters evening - rph coverage was very appealing having siad that however if it was a homey today me and a couple of my lads would have been there
by LBJ8 » Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:53 pm
Wedgie wrote:southee wrote:No, hearing them talk themselves up year after year.
Lets face it, they have been our BITCHES for the last few years!!!
Considering you guys have won 12 flags and they've won 4, you can perhaps go back 70 years at least!;)
by stampy » Sat Jun 02, 2007 2:05 pm
Dutchy wrote:stampy wrote:nah i wasnt there dutchy old son, when we both work all week and with kids to attend to sometimes attending matches isnt no.1 priority and as for travelling from down south to the parade on a cold winters evening - rph coverage was very appealing having siad that however if it was a homey today me and a couple of my lads would have been there
no dramas know how you feel, your usually there...casue ti was a night game it was easier for me to get there....kids in bed before I left...wife happy...Dutchy can go to footy!!!
by Rik E Boy » Sat Jun 02, 2007 4:07 pm
by mal » Sat Jun 02, 2007 6:23 pm
by am Bays » Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:02 pm
Wedgie wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Well dutchy, what's the problem then?
Glenelg should be strong, all the time, yet they're not...why?
I blame their supporters that don't travel.
by am Bays » Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:07 pm
hondo71 wrote:Is changing the coach (AGAIN) the right thing for the Bays? So many different coaches since Cornsey ....
Honest question, not trolling ..... Bay supporters what do you think?
by bayman » Sun Jun 03, 2007 6:45 pm
mal wrote:In all fairness Glenelg did miss Culpitt and Vlatko
Culpitt BOG in the Advertiser
Vlatko leading goalscorer for the legs with 3 goals
by mal » Sun Jun 03, 2007 6:55 pm
bayman wrote:mal wrote:In all fairness Glenelg did miss Culpitt and Vlatko
Culpitt BOG in the Advertiser
Vlatko leading goalscorer for the legs with 3 goals
a very poor attempt at humour mal, perhaps norwood missed jack fosdike or neil hein or even robert oatey & that statement was almost as poor as your attempt at humour
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Jun 03, 2007 6:59 pm
mal wrote:bayman wrote:mal wrote:In all fairness Glenelg did miss Culpitt and Vlatko
Culpitt BOG in the Advertiser
Vlatko leading goalscorer for the legs with 3 goals
a very poor attempt at humour mal, perhaps norwood missed jack fosdike or neil hein or even robert oatey & that statement was almost as poor as your attempt at humour
Last year at Glenelg Oval a few Glenelg supporters were abusing Culpitt.
Chatter on the sites continued the abuse of Culpitt after that game.
Culpitt was adjudged BOG in the press
This is payback for all those Glenelg barrackers [not you BAYMAN]
Especially that SUPERFAN from the other site
Also Glenelg are struggling up forward this year
Willetts and Vlatko would be handy these days
As I said the shit I put up with when Glenelg slaughtered Norwood last year was unjust.
The tide has turned , the "heath ledger " is square now.
PS did HEIN and OATEY play for the Bays?
PS Amazing how much a side can improve when they dont have the flu .....
by bayman » Sun Jun 03, 2007 7:04 pm
mal wrote:bayman wrote:mal wrote:In all fairness Glenelg did miss Culpitt and Vlatko
Culpitt BOG in the Advertiser
Vlatko leading goalscorer for the legs with 3 goals
a very poor attempt at humour mal, perhaps norwood missed jack fosdike or neil hein or even robert oatey & that statement was almost as poor as your attempt at humour
Last year at Glenelg Oval a few Glenelg supporters were abusing Culpitt.
Chatter on the sites continued the abuse of Culpitt after that game.
Culpitt was adjudged BOG in the press
This is payback for all those Glenelg barrackers [not you BAYMAN]
Also Glenelg are struggling up forward this year
Willetts and Vlatko would be handy these days
As I said the shit I put up with when Glenelg slaughtered Norwood last year was unjust.
The tide has turned , the "heath ledger " is square now.
PS did HEIN and OATEY play for the Bays?
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Jun 03, 2007 7:07 pm
by mal » Sun Jun 03, 2007 7:14 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Jun 03, 2007 7:16 pm
by Dirko » Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:20 pm
by Ecky » Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:33 pm
spell_check wrote:I'd like to say thanks to the Glenelg stats team for making me feel welcome tonight. I was more than happy to help out.It's a shame that the only shining light on the field was Luke Panozzo, who got 6.1 from 7 kicks.
kick-mk-hb
18 10 9 Fisher, Adam
16 7 9 Boak, Travis
16 11 8 Kane, Ben
16 4 6 Backwell, Brett
15 6 5 Hinge, John
11 8 8 Mules, Ben
16 8 3 Rudolph, Sam
8 6 9 Murphy, Byron
10 6 4 Button, Lachlan
6 4 8 Kirkby, Ruory
10 5 4 Moore, Ben
4 2 9 Douglas, Richard
11 5 2 McConnell, Justin
8 7 5 Sherwood, Paul
8 6 2 Smith, Jeff
6 4 3 Mitchell, David
7 5 2 Panozzo, Luke
4 1 3 Block, Lucas
6 3 1 Mahoney, Josh
4 2 2 Allen, Ty
3 1 1 Plant, Robert
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by JK » Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:09 am
by JK » Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:17 am
Dutchy wrote:I was interested int he crowd though....where has all the Norwood fans gone? stands only 1/3 full and outnumbered on Coopers Hill....get out there your team is playing some good footy
by Dutchy » Mon Jun 04, 2007 12:21 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:Dutchy wrote:I was interested int he crowd though....where has all the Norwood fans gone? stands only 1/3 full and outnumbered on Coopers Hill....get out there your team is playing some good footy
I think you'll find Dutchman, that generally most/many opposition supporters head to Coopers Hill, so Legs fans are often outnumbered there ... I'd be confident that there were more Legs fans in the crowd throughout the venue (as there should be for most home teams) on Fri night than Bays fans.
I will say though, that I think the number of Norwood supporters who attend games is often mythical ... I personally don't think there is that same presence of the last 3 decades ... The Legs IMHO achieve good home attendances every year due to the number of opposition supporters the games attract.
The club has a vast contingent of elderly supporters and very few in the younger age bracket, something they need to address quick smart IMHO.
Should Norwood return to a competition heavyweight, it would be interesting to see the numbers ... If they have large numbers in support there will be a sh1tload of bandwagoners amongst them thats for sure.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |