SA Footy

Dutchy wrote:Lets spell it out - Fuller and Collins are NOT the last 2

SDK wrote:Yes Trevor Hill was a disaster but the supporter base stayed with the Club and did something about it !!!! We did not walk away from the Club.

MatteeG wrote:

SDK wrote:Yes Trevor Hill was a disaster but the supporter base stayed with the Club and did something about it !!!! We did not walk away from the Club.

LOL pretty sure the supporter base was bare bones during the Hill era...we dont get a chance to overthrow the coach, the board beats us to it!

JK wrote:

MatteeG wrote:

SDK wrote:Yes Trevor Hill was a disaster but the supporter base stayed with the Club and did something about it !!!! We did not walk away from the Club.

LOL pretty sure the supporter base was bare bones during the Hill era...we dont get a chance to overthrow the coach, the board beats us to it!

Think we were still around the 3rd or 4th highest attendance figures, but there's no doubt that's increased since he moved on and we've started winning more than losing - Would be the same at all clubs I'd imagine. Our membership levels have been much higher too since we became more competitive.

SpionKopster wrote:Rick MacGowan?

Panther Pack wrote:Hearing a lot of noise about Andrew Jarman, can anyone confirm if he is in the final 2 applicants?

maxyoz wrote:

Panther Pack wrote:Hearing a lot of noise about Andrew Jarman, can anyone confirm if he is in the final 2 applicants?

OK, it's down to 2.

Andrew Jarman, Graham Campbell and Rick MacGowan.

Pooh - that's 3, ok, it's down to 3 then.

DOC wrote:

FOURTH ESTATE wrote:Don't want Fuller or Collins both have no idea???? Glenelg's game plan was bad enough with Massie let alone these two.

What do I care anyway as I won't be rejoining as a member because of their weak board effort with the Cow$.

If Andrew Jarman gets the job which he should have after Mickan I might think about it. At least they might have skill level above D6 Amateur level.

Saw more skill level at the SAAFL D4 GF this year between Plympton & Brahma Lodge and that was at a higher level than what the Bays have displayed for most of the year!!!!!!!

Glenelg reserves would comfortably beat both those sides.

Panther Pack wrote:

maxyoz wrote:

Panther Pack wrote:Hearing a lot of noise about Andrew Jarman, can anyone confirm if he is in the final 2 applicants?

OK, it's down to 2.

Andrew Jarman, Graham Campbell and Rick MacGowan.

Pooh - that's 3, ok, it's down to 3 then.

Maxy you forgot to mention Trevor Hill I noticed his name was dropped into the conversation could he be the wild card people are talking about?

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:I hate to admit this, but Jars would've been better than Massie

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:I hate to admit this, but Jars would've been better than Massie

FOURTH ESTATE wrote:No he wouldn't, they would have played attractive attacking football.

Attractive attacking football = Wins & Crowds!!!!

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:I hate to admit this, but Jars would've been better than Massie

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:

FOURTH ESTATE wrote:No he wouldn't, they would have played attractive attacking football.

Attractive attacking football = Wins & Crowds!!!!

plus id rather watch an attacking game plan - even if it meant we were losing by 10 goals

theres nothing worse than playing some of the crap massie had us playing.

playing attacking footy means less emphasis on skills which we lacked greatly in