RD10 Sturt v Centrals MATCH REVIEW

[Dogwatcher]

No worries.

[Wedgie]

God, I love it when supporters of opposing teams go tit for tat with 'offensive' incidents to try. Boring.

Yes quite.
Dogs fans NEVER do this. How I wish everyone would be just like them, so much more intellectually stimulating.
Wot?

Did you notice the word opposing teams? That means two teams - ergo in this thread Central District and Sturt fans.

I thought 'opposing teams' was two words?

[Dogwatcher]

The word opposing is one.

[Wedgie]

The word opposing is one.

Teams isn't a word too?

[Dogwatcher]

Opposing was the key word in the post I originally made to which Theri responded to. Hence the use of one word, not two, in my follow up post.

To quote you, my quotable friend, it's not rocket science!

[Wedgie]

So it was 2 words you quoted but one key word even though you left out key which was probably a key word too?
With ya know.
It is rocket science if you have to read your mind but definately not now you've advised of your mistake.
Thanks for the explanation!

Who won the game again?
Im assuming since the dogs fans are grumpy and the Sturt fans are coming out of the woodwork that Sturt won? Now THAT assumption isn't rocket science!

[Dogwatcher]

So it was 2 words you quoted but one key word even though you left out key which was probably a key word too?
With ya know.
It is rocket science if you have to read your mind but definately not now you've advised of your mistake.
Thanks for the explanation!

Who won the game again?
Im assuming since the dogs fans are grumpy and the Sturt fans are coming out of the woodwork that Sturt won? Now THAT assumption isn't rocket science!

Theri knew what I was talking about. That's all that matters.

I think Sturt won. But as I said somewhere else, I didn't see this game, so it never existed.

[tipper]

So it was 2 words you quoted but one key word even though you left out key which was probably a key word too?
With ya know.
It is rocket science if you have to read your mind but definately not now you've advised of your mistake.
Thanks for the explanation!

Who won the game again?
Im assuming since the dogs fans are grumpy and the Sturt fans are coming out of the woodwork that Sturt won? Now THAT assumption isn't rocket science!

Theri knew what I was talking about. That's all that matters.

I think Sturt won. But as I said somewhere else, I didn't see this game, so it never existed.

Can i use that reasoning with the 89 grand final? i am pretty sure in my household it could be a standard belief there was no GF in 89