Tribunal result

[Big Phil]

Tonight - 15/4 WWTFC Results
Ben Schwarze not guilty
Sam Fairclough - reprimand

Obviously the tribunal like Ben Schwarze and don't have a problem with seeing repeat offenders on a regular basis...

I reckon that he's got off pretty easy a few times now hasn't he...

Big Phil...

[Columbo]

As he has been found not guilty this week and last that would make him an "alleged" repeat offender wouldn't it Big Phil??

[spell_check]

Bayman I believe reports are 50 metre penalty.

Entirely academic, but Treeby at quarter time only got a 15 to 25 metre penalty when Clayton was reported. I was surprised that wasn't a 50 when that happened.

[pipers]

Action hero AND escape artist...

[CUTTERMAN]

Is it me or is the SANFL tribunal soft on players and games banned? Or are we soft from watching the cleansed version of Aussie Rules and their penalties. I'm getting confused!

[GWW]

Is it me or is the SANFL tribunal soft on players and games banned? Or are we soft from watching the cleansed version of Aussie Rules and their penalties. I'm getting confused!

The SANFL has been soft for at least 5 years now.

[am Bays]

Bring back Scooter's toughest opponent....

Brian Martin....

[CUTTERMAN]

Brian Martin QC I should think Tas!

[MightyEagles]

Tonight - 15/4 WWTFC Results
Ben Schwarze not guilty
Sam Fairclough - reprimand

Obviously the tribunal like Ben Schwarze and don't have a problem with seeing repeat offenders on a regular basis...

I reckon that he's got off pretty easy a few times now hasn't he...

Big Phil...

Central can talk, seeing how often the Gowans get off.

[smac]

Tonight - 15/4 WWTFC Results
Ben Schwarze not guilty
Sam Fairclough - reprimand

Obviously the tribunal like Ben Schwarze and don't have a problem with seeing repeat offenders on a regular basis...

I reckon that he's got off pretty easy a few times now hasn't he...

Big Phil...

Central can talk, seeing how often the Gowans get off.

Once again...

They are 2 players, not 1 - don't let the fact they are twins confuse you too much.

Look at their individual records. 8 seasons of SANFL, bugger all reports, one significant offence that caused a suspension (for James only, not Chris as well!!!).

[Mickyj]

Tonight - 15/4 WWTFC Results
Ben Schwarze not guilty
Sam Fairclough - reprimand

Obviously the tribunal like Ben Schwarze and don't have a problem with seeing repeat offenders on a regular basis...

I reckon that he's got off pretty easy a few times now hasn't he...

Big Phil...

Central can talk, seeing how often the Gowans get off.

Once again...

They are 2 players, not 1 - don't let the fact they are twins confuse you too much.

Look at their individual records. 8 seasons of SANFL, bugger all reports, one significant offence that caused a suspension (for James only, not Chris as well!!!).

Lets not forget that the two Eagle players were reported for very soft incidents .Maybe the SANFL is getting report happy for minor offences.

[smac]

Probably closer to the issue, I reckon.

[RustyCage]

Sam Fairclough - reprimand

So the SANFL are happy to have players getting hit on top of the head when their head is down over the ball? Very poor decision this one. Deserved a couple of weeks. Cant have this in the game, but if the SANFL says its ok......

[RustyCage]

Lets not forget that the two Eagle players were reported for very soft incidents .Maybe the SANFL is getting report happy for minor offences.

The Fairclough one wasn't soft at all.

[Mickyj]

Lets not forget that the two Eagle players were reported for very soft incidents .Maybe the SANFL is getting report happy for minor offences.

The Fairclough one wasn't soft at all.

what happened to the port player that got reported ?

What Flaircough did was clumsy and he was repremanded .Not like he is a David Grainger clone or anything

[Big Phil]

As he has been found not guilty this week and last that would make him an "alleged" repeat offender wouldn't it Big Phil??

Well, well, well...

We have another Smart Arse on this forum...

Yes, if you want to get all technical on me than yes, you are right...

Doesn't hide from the fact that he was up in front of the tribunal again. Hang on a sec, more than once, that's twice isn't it ??

Or in other words mate, A REPEAT OFFENDER. He was reported for committing an offence, alleged or not, the umpire has put him in the book for an indescretion. The umps would know, they are the onces that police the rules (or at least they try to, with not much success, but that is another issue all together !!?)

Based on this mate, that makes him a REPEAT OFFENDER in my language, yes, an alleged no doubt, but still an offender...

I ALLEGE that you are just a whinging Eagles supporter who is frustrated with his teams performance.

I reckon the SANFL is really off the mark with the tribunal hearings. Too often you hear about these big indiscretions and people start saying the guy is going to get 3 or 4 weeks AND THEN, they get off with a reprimand or soft 1 week suspension.

I guess I'm not specifically picking on Schwarze, more wanting to highlight the weakness of the tribunal...

For example, everyone was saying Todd Grima should have got 3 - 5 games and he only got 1 ?

With what we saw in the AFL with Barry Hall getting 7 weeks, James Gowans is probably lucky to only get 3 weeks for his left hook on Shubert in last years Grand Final. I must admit, I was a bit worried as a Doggies supporter when it happened, I seriously though he would get 5 games minimum and he only got the 3... ??? What does that say then ???

I just reckon the SANFL needs to keep up to speed with the AFL with the severity of their punishments. I know SANFL aren't as powerful as the AFL, obviously, ad they don't have the same kind of financial backing for a panel to instigate a points system, as well as player appeals, and all the technical jargon, but surely, with most, if not all SANFL games being recorded on TV these days, surely that cold hard evidence should come into play and the punishment should fit the crime accordingly ??

Again, Gowans, in my opinion, was pretty lucky, but in saying that Shubert is bloody luckier for not getting doen, or at least friggin' reported for the hit he gave James FIRST. Yes, James just went back at him in retaliation but wouldn't you... Begs the question, do the SANFL have a video review panel ? By this example, I would say NO as Shubert should have got done as well based on TV evidence of his poor indescretion...

Big Phil...

[Mickyj]

As he has been found not guilty this week and last that would make him an "alleged" repeat offender wouldn't it Big Phil??

Well, well, well...

We have another Smart Arse on this forum...

Yes, if you want to get all technical on me than yes, you are right...

Doesn't hide from the fact that he was up in front of the tribunal again. Hang on a sec, more than once, that's twice isn't it ??

Or in other words mate, A REPEAT OFFENDER. He was reported for committing an offence, alleged or not, the umpire has put him in the book for an indescretion. The umps would know, they are the onces that police the rules (or at least they try to, with not much success, but that is another issue all together !!?)

Based on this mate, that makes him a REPEAT OFFENDER in my language, yes, an alleged no doubt, but still an offender...

I ALLEGE that you are just a whinging Eagles supporter who is frustrated with his teams performance.

I reckon the SANFL is really off the mark with the tribunal hearings. Too often you hear about these big indiscretions and people start saying the guy is going to get 3 or 4 weeks AND THEN, they get off with a reprimand or soft 1 week suspension.

I guess I'm not specifically picking on Schwarze, more wanting to highlight the weakness of the tribunal...

For example, everyone was saying Todd Grima should have got 3 - 5 games and he only got 1 ?

With what we saw in the AFL with Barry Hall getting 7 weeks, James Gowans is probably lucky to only get 3 weeks for his left hook on Shubert. I was a bit worried, as a Doggies supporter when it happened, i though he would get 5 minimum and he only got the 3... ???

I just reckon the SANFL needs to keep up to speed with the AFL with their punishments. I know they don't have the same kind of financial backing for appeals and all the technical jargon, but surely, with most, if not all SANFL games being recorded these days, surely that cold hard evidence should come into play and the punishment should fit the crime accordingly ??

Again, Gowans, in my opinion, was pretty lucky, but in saying that Shubert is bloody luckier for not getting reported for the hit he gave james FIRST. James just went back at him in retaliation... Begs the question, do the SANFL have a video review panel ? By this example, I would say NO as Shubert should have got done as well based on TV evidence of his poor indescretion...

Big Phil...

I think he was just trying to be funny big phil IMHO
And what Schwarze did running in and bumping the guy in the back twice in two weeks .The first week he really charged in hard and heavy very very lucky to get off the second week he hardly touched the guy .
Eagles supporter yes thats me Whining no we are shit right now can not get away from it .
On to the Gowans not sure who is worse but in past years they seemed to get reported and get off in most cases .Not a whine or a whinge just what it appears to fans not involved with Centrals the same thing now applies to Schwarze.
This is not the AFL more players get off in the SANFL thats a fact!!

[Big Phil]

As he has been found not guilty this week and last that would make him an "alleged" repeat offender wouldn't it Big Phil??

Well, well, well...

We have another Smart Arse on this forum...

Yes, if you want to get all technical on me than yes, you are right...

Doesn't hide from the fact that he was up in front of the tribunal again. Hang on a sec, more than once, that's twice isn't it ??

Or in other words mate, A REPEAT OFFENDER. He was reported for committing an offence, alleged or not, the umpire has put him in the book for an indescretion. The umps would know, they are the onces that police the rules (or at least they try to, with not much success, but that is another issue all together !!?)

Based on this mate, that makes him a REPEAT OFFENDER in my language, yes, an alleged no doubt, but still an offender...

I ALLEGE that you are just a whinging Eagles supporter who is frustrated with his teams performance.

I reckon the SANFL is really off the mark with the tribunal hearings. Too often you hear about these big indiscretions and people start saying the guy is going to get 3 or 4 weeks AND THEN, they get off with a reprimand or soft 1 week suspension.

I guess I'm not specifically picking on Schwarze, more wanting to highlight the weakness of the tribunal...

For example, everyone was saying Todd Grima should have got 3 - 5 games and he only got 1 ?

With what we saw in the AFL with Barry Hall getting 7 weeks, James Gowans is probably lucky to only get 3 weeks for his left hook on Shubert. I was a bit worried, as a Doggies supporter when it happened, i though he would get 5 minimum and he only got the 3... ???

I just reckon the SANFL needs to keep up to speed with the AFL with their punishments. I know they don't have the same kind of financial backing for appeals and all the technical jargon, but surely, with most, if not all SANFL games being recorded these days, surely that cold hard evidence should come into play and the punishment should fit the crime accordingly ??

Again, Gowans, in my opinion, was pretty lucky, but in saying that Shubert is bloody luckier for not getting reported for the hit he gave james FIRST. James just went back at him in retaliation... Begs the question, do the SANFL have a video review panel ? By this example, I would say NO as Shubert should have got done as well based on TV evidence of his poor indescretion...

Big Phil...

I think he was just trying to be funny big phil IMHO
And what Schwarze did running in and bumping the guy in the back twice in two weeks .The first week he really charged in hard and heavy very very lucky to get off the second week he hardly touched the guy .
Eagles supporter yes thats me Whining no we are s***t right now can not get away from it .
On to the Gowans not sure who is worse but in past years they seemed to get reported and get off in most cases .Not a whine or a whinge just what it appears to fans not involved with Centrals the same thing now applies to Schwarze.
This is not the AFL more players get off in the SANFL thats a fact!!

You bring to the plate the amount of times the Gowans' Twins have been reported AND gotton off then we might actually have something to talk about MikyJ, you'll be suprised, trust me...

Yes, there are antagonistic pains in the arses, for opposition players and supporters, no doubt, I would probably hate them as well if I went for another SANFL team, BUT that would NEVER EVER happen !!!??

The Twins are top blokes on and off the field, and yes, the may push the boundaries every time, barring one major indescretion, they are certainly not thugs or biffs, not like some blokes running around in the competition... ???

This is just the way they play and by getting under the skin of the opposition, it is, in part, what makes them great footballers !!!

You honestly tell me that you and any other team, wouldn't want the two boys playing in your team if you had the chance ??? Hey ???

Big Phil...

[RustyCage]

Any word on Jezza?

[Jardarf]

Port Adelaide forum says Jeremy Clayton got a reprimand and is free to play on Sunday