Wedgie wrote:Ian makes a post on the 9th of April merely putting up the scores and then almost a month later you 2 carry on like schoolkids merely because of the scores he posted which were in the appropriate topic and you describe him as "unbelievable"? because of it? WTF?
Come on lads, we're above that here. I expected better. If you have a chip on your shoulder for some reason take it elsewhere, pm the people involved or at the very least post it somewhere appropriate.
Cheers.
Common Wedgie Im just having a bit of fun with all this - please dont take it so seriously!! There's no malice intended!
If you want me to limit my posts to straight, mindless, boring, factual, uncontroversial comments please let me know
.
No one ever criticises posts that contain line after line of meaningless stats that, in my opinion, really contribute nothing to the energy and life of the site – and rightly so since just because they are not my cup of tea doesn’t make them wrong. Someone obviously thinks they are worthwhile.
Similarly just because I poke a bit of fun at some posts and offer an alternative point of view, I equally don’t think I should be criticised for this tact. I never intend to be nasty or personal but sometimes context is difficult to convey in writing.
