by Adelaide Hawk » Sat May 20, 2006 7:01 pm
The thing I don't understand about umpiring is we have rules. Why don't umpires just adjudicate on the rules instead of trying to interpret them? I mean, if a player is pushed in the back, pay a free. If a player is held without possesion, pay a free. All these rule interpretations are keeping umpires in two minds which is causing the mediocrity and inconsistency.