The "Holding the Ball" Rule

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Postby doggies4eva » Fri Jul 14, 2006 10:27 am

Dissident wrote:
doggies4eva wrote:I agree with the above - the question is what is prior opportunity?

In my view the current pace of footy means that about 2 seconds is long enough to take possession and dispose of it - some of the skillful players can get a ball out of a pack faster than that.

After that once a tackle is laid a player must dispose of it by either a handball or kick - if an arm is pinned reward the tackler.

If the ball is jarred free by the tackle play on.

This all seems straightforward. Why does it not appear to happen on a consistent basis?


I don't agree with rewarding the tackler if one arm is pinned. Maybe that's just the way I look at it though? As I said before - if you have no opportunity before the tackle and then one arm is pinned (thereofre still creating no opportunity) then how can a free kick be given. I'm all for rewarding a tackle - but you have to remember that you're *penalising* the person being tackled who, in that instance, would have none nothing wrong.

As for the pace of the game - well I don't think that affects what prior opportunity is. For every bit faster that a person can get rid of the ball, the person chasing to tackle is that little bit faster too. It's all relative.


What I said was 1. Allow prior opportunity -otherwise play on or ball up.
2. If a tackle is then laid and an aem pinned it should be a free - they had prior opportunity. That's what the rule says!

The point about pace of the game was a player at league level should have the skills to move the ball quickly.
We used to be good :-(
User avatar
doggies4eva
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: In front of a computer screen
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Dissident » Sun Jul 16, 2006 10:03 am

doggies4eva wrote:
Dissident wrote:
doggies4eva wrote:I agree with the above - the question is what is prior opportunity?

In my view the current pace of footy means that about 2 seconds is long enough to take possession and dispose of it - some of the skillful players can get a ball out of a pack faster than that.

After that once a tackle is laid a player must dispose of it by either a handball or kick - if an arm is pinned reward the tackler.

If the ball is jarred free by the tackle play on.

This all seems straightforward. Why does it not appear to happen on a consistent basis?


I don't agree with rewarding the tackler if one arm is pinned. Maybe that's just the way I look at it though? As I said before - if you have no opportunity before the tackle and then one arm is pinned (thereofre still creating no opportunity) then how can a free kick be given. I'm all for rewarding a tackle - but you have to remember that you're *penalising* the person being tackled who, in that instance, would have none nothing wrong.

As for the pace of the game - well I don't think that affects what prior opportunity is. For every bit faster that a person can get rid of the ball, the person chasing to tackle is that little bit faster too. It's all relative.


What I said was 1. Allow prior opportunity -otherwise play on or ball up.
2. If a tackle is then laid and an aem pinned it should be a free - they had prior opportunity. That's what the rule says!

The point about pace of the game was a player at league level should have the skills to move the ball quickly.


Not doubting that.. If there is prior opportuinity then it doesn't matter how the tackle is. But, if there is no prior, and then one arm is pinned - that should be a ball up.
User avatar
Dissident
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 6394
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:55 am
Location: Adelaide, SA
Has liked: 110 times
Been liked: 158 times

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |