Have the Magpies got some hard years ahead of them??

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Postby whufc » Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:10 am

I find this topic very intresting im not a usual poster but have heard from a very very reliable source that J Clayton is very unhappy. From what this source was telling me who is very close to the action, this has lead clayton to speak to a couple of good mates from playing days in Victoria being the Gowans twins. In the end if the Gowans play on for another year which was not in their plans might have J Clayton in the center with them.
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28741
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5955 times
Been liked: 2846 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Postby Booney » Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:17 am

Please,please,this cant be true.Im not sure what is worse news,Clayton a possibility to go North up Salisbury Highway,or the Gowans' playing another year.... #-o
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61591
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8186 times
Been liked: 11916 times

Postby - » Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:24 am

If port get players back I wont want to be the loser of the qualifying final.
Never give a sucker an even break

Nor ban a user for an acceptable topic of discussion.

"Baby on board". Why dont you put a sign on ur car saying "adult on board" or "car stereo in use"?
-
Reserves
 
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:12 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby whufc » Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:25 am

like i said it comes from a reliable source but obviously there would have to be a million and one things that would need to be sorted out first and we know port wouldn't let him go cheap thats for sure. It will be intresting though.
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28741
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5955 times
Been liked: 2846 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Postby BM » Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:06 pm

Would be interested to know why J Clayton is so "unhappy". Surely cant be coin. Is it the coach? Is it the fact that Clive is such a tosser and by some reports is unsettling the group? Does J Clayton think he is the be and end all? Is it the fact that the recent performances of the pies have been ordinary? I seem to recall some mumblings early in the year about him maybe going to the Eagles. I also remember hearing him on the radio after his mag medal win saying how great the maggies were, great club, great blokes etc. How quick things can go pear shaped. He was close to being drafted last year so maybe he will be out the door anyway.
BM
Rookie
 
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 2:16 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby whufc » Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:17 pm

yeah it is interesting but my understanding which self admittedly isn't great is it has alot to do with the desire of the playing group and the reasons for some of the players being there. I've met the man a couple of times and he comes across alot like the Gowans a very intense footballer who wants to win at all costs and expects the same outta every one around which i don't think he feels his getting.
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28741
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5955 times
Been liked: 2846 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Postby drebin » Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:55 pm

Booney wrote:Might want to edit that post again Drebin,it appears you have used macca19's quote to dig at me?


whoops - sorry booney! fixed now
drebin
 

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:20 pm

whufc wrote:I find this topic very intresting im not a usual poster but have heard from a very very reliable source that J Clayton is very unhappy.


Be careful. I was abused on this forum earlier in the season for suggesting the same thing. :)
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby am Bays » Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:57 pm

Gravel,

I'm not that naive to suggest that all of Glenelg's problems can be put down to the formation of the Crows in 1990 or that we were the only club affected by it, however I will argue that it is the most significant of a number of factors that contributed to our "success" in the last 15 years and that arguable we were the SANFL club most affected by it .....See my posts on the SA history forum in the thread titled SA Footy metamorphisis in 1990 on the impact of the events on 1990 had on the Bays....

Some good points made by other posters, it is my supposition that the Magpies are lacking the onfield leadership and standard setting of Ginevar, Poole, Northeast etc where players stepping outside the team boundaries and discipline were pulled into line by the playing group. When it is the senior players in apparent conflict with the coach, (J Clayton and waterhouse) it is a dangerous sign.....

Once again I don't believe they will stoop to our depths of mediocrity over the next few years but the signs ATM don't look good from an outsiders point of view....

The other statement I'll make is don't rely on juniors to turn things around, juniors supplement the player group not make it as good recruits and expereinced current senior players are vitally important too. Didn't Westies win both junior grades in 2002, how has that translated to on-field success for them since 2003 ???
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19724
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2122 times

Postby Macca19 » Tue Aug 01, 2006 4:20 pm

I do agree about the junior grades thing. Most of the players dont reach senior level and anyone ultra decent would be snapped up by the AFL anyway. However, what Port need to do is make sure some of the talented ones stick around. We need to find more Biacsi/Jenner/Eichner types that end up good enough and are commited enough to play for the club. I did also mention that we do need to hang on to the AFL imports and continue to attract a couple of other s- namely a ruck and KPP.

As for Jezza. As someone said, pre season he was supposed to have quit the club and was seen training with the Eagles. Dont believe everything you hear. Its quite possible that he isnt happy. None of us would really know though. He is the most intense footballer ive seen at the club...very angry bloke. Whether its because he is bloody good and therefore expects that from everyone else I dont know but ive seen him numerous times go off his nut at his teammates, coaching staff, trainers etc. If he doesnt get re-drafted, hopefully he does stay on for next year
Macca19
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1961
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:54 pm
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 10 times
Grassroots Team: Ports

Postby am Bays » Tue Aug 01, 2006 4:24 pm

Macca19 wrote: Dont believe everything you hear.


Good point I meant to make a statement along those lines.....

Only half the lies you hear are true..... :wink:
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19724
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2122 times

Postby Macca19 » Tue Aug 01, 2006 6:01 pm

Drebin - In that North game earlier this year we were missing Fitzgerald, Jenner, Elstone, Wait, Evans, had Lokan injured in the opening 2 minutes. Wanganeen was also missing. Yes I will mention them, Kingsley, Stevens and Surjan all got promoted that week. We had to make 5 forced changes to the side for that week. No, missing AFL players is not an excuse, but when you have them all year and they all get promoted in the one week then you cannot deny that it unsettles team balance. So we had 6 regulars injured, another injured very early. So no, we werent full strength as you claim.

As for other clubs claiming AFL players. I think its a different situation. Eagles claiming they are missing Mcgregor, Hentschel, Biglands etc when they havent played there for three years is a big difference to Port fans claiming Stevens, Surjan, Kingsley and Wanganeen when all 4 have qualified for this years SANFL finals.
Macca19
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1961
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:54 pm
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 10 times
Grassroots Team: Ports

Postby ravendale rulz » Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:53 pm

PAP - why dont they play Jamie Charmans brother from the reserves... rumour is the Power will draft him thats why they dont want anyone too see him in the league side.... the kid should get a game along with that Hall kid. Mikeljoke was shocking last week. Sack him
ravendale rulz
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 700
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:51 pm
Location: At the bar of best sporting complex in Country SA
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Gravel » Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:46 pm

1980 - I could not find that post. Can you provide a link. Thanks
Gravel
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 231
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 8:16 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 8 times

Postby am Bays » Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:01 am

Go to the History forum on page two of the thread index (towards the bottom) is a thread title the SANFL metamorphesis, circa 1990. I have two posts on that thread, one on pg 1 and one on pg 2 where I detail my opinion on the effect of the Crows formation on the Glenleg Football Club[/url]
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19724
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2122 times

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:04 am

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:The other statement I'll make is don't rely on juniors to turn things around, juniors supplement the player group not make it as good recruits and expereinced current senior players are vitally important too. Didn't Westies win both junior grades in 2002, how has that translated to on-field success for them since 2003 ???


West Adelaide lost those kids in the national draft (including a No.1), that's why they have struggled. Norwood lost 6 juniors in the draft last year and you cannot thrive if you don't have the money to replace them. With the advent of the Crows, Norwod lost both their administrative and corporate structures and have struggled ever since, whereas some other clubs (one in particular) have been able to carry on relatively unaffected by SA's AFL involvement.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Magpies_Forever » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:35 am

Well we still do need some depth and in my view we are still rebuilding the side. we have a good 21 starting players but a[part from that there are alot of young players who still need time to develope their game.
User avatar
Magpies_Forever
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 8:30 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |