Sturt v North Adelaide Post Match Review

[southee]

Thanks you Double Blues....gives us a bit of a lifeline

[blueandwhite]

Sturt you champions!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

yeah great win Sturt!!!!

[The Sleeping Giant]

Wonder if the North people who were getting stuck into Bown last week for king hitting Backwell will come out and say that Backwell is a coward aswell.

Backwell = thug. He's on the list with Bown and Eagleton.

[Jim05]

Wonder if the North people who were getting stuck into Bown last week for king hitting Backwell will come out and say that Backwell is a coward aswell.

Backwell = thug. He's on the list with Bown and Eagleton.

Thats ok then, surprised Allers isnt on that list though

[The Sleeping Giant]

The list is long. Aller's is on it don't worry.

[fish]

Almost fell off my chair when I heard Sturt were up by 7 goals before halftime...

[topcat10]

Harms goal came from his 2nd touch.

But for wayward kicking, Sturt could have been out of site by qtr time.
But for even more wayward kicking North could have won it in the end.

3.9 in the last qtr to the Roosters and 23 scoring shots to 10 in the 2nd half.

Sounded like some strange umpiring decisions, and RPH was giving the men in white a right old spray.

Was there a Sturt report for striking Thring?

Harms goal came from his first KICK in league footy.

Why would there be a report Crane didn't even get a free kick-and nobody is suggesting that Keller should be reported

[Big Phil]

Does anyone know the final ressies scores from this game?

[topcat10]

Does anyone know the final ressies scores from this game?

Sturt 20-9
North 11-9

[GWW]

Does anyone know the final ressies scores from this game?

http://www.sportingpulse.com/round_info ... 5-0&pool=1

[locky801]

Harms goal came from his 2nd touch.

But for wayward kicking, Sturt could have been out of site by qtr time.
But for even more wayward kicking North could have won it in the end.

3.9 in the last qtr to the Roosters and 23 scoring shots to 10 in the 2nd half.

Sounded like some strange umpiring decisions, and RPH was giving the men in white a right old spray.

Was there a Sturt report for striking Thring?

Harms goal came from his first KICK in league footy.

Why would there be a report Crane didn't even get a free kick-and nobody is suggesting that Keller should be reported

Didnt know you could be reported for a head clash, is that another new report bought in FFS

[Jimmy]

BITCHES

has a bottom placed team been able to have a bitch before?

encouraging debuts by harms and laube and i think both got goals with thier first kicks in league footy!

cubillo, kurtze, the 1st gamers, tambling, martin and crane before he went off were good from listening to the radio.

no sheedy as well!!

hinge king of the clangers...does glenelg want him back?

Gee your a wanker

You must be new here? Rules are that north are sturts bitches.

[Jimmy]

Harms goal came from his 2nd touch.

But for wayward kicking, Sturt could have been out of site by qtr time.
But for even more wayward kicking North could have won it in the end.

3.9 in the last qtr to the Roosters and 23 scoring shots to 10 in the 2nd half.

Sounded like some strange umpiring decisions, and RPH was giving the men in white a right old spray.

Was there a Sturt report for striking Thring?

Harms goal came from his first KICK in league footy.

Why would there be a report Crane didn't even get a free kick-and nobody is suggesting that Keller should be reported

Didnt know you could be reported for a head clash, is that another new report bought in FFS

Umm, I don't think he is suggesting it should have been reported??

[topcat10]

Thanks-at least somebody can read the post correctly

[The Sleeping Giant]

Didn't Parry get suspended for a head clash this year? nyuk nyuk

[robranisgod]

has a bottom placed team been able to have a bitch before?

That is a good question for spelly...

Glenelg might have done it once. I recall in one of the spoon years the Bays beat South twice during the season. No idea if there was a South win in between, or if the second of those two sealed a run of three, as per the official footysa.com Bitch requirements.

I think that Norwood only won three games in 1968 all against Central. Adelaide Hawk, Mal or Spelly may be able to vertify that fact.

[sapaul]

Correct RiG. They also had a draw against South but just the 3 wins against Central.

[CK]

On a general note from the match, James Allan's game was one of the best I've seen in SANFL this season. Will be very surprised if he doesn't get the three votes from this game, with acknowledgement to Richard Tambling, who played arguably his best game in Sturt colours.

[johntheclaret]

Harms goal came from his 2nd touch.

But for wayward kicking, Sturt could have been out of site by qtr time.
But for even more wayward kicking North could have won it in the end.

3.9 in the last qtr to the Roosters and 23 scoring shots to 10 in the 2nd half.

Sounded like some strange umpiring decisions, and RPH was giving the men in white a right old spray.

Was there a Sturt report for striking Thring?

Harms goal came from his first KICK in league footy.

Why would there be a report Crane didn't even get a free kick-and nobody is suggesting that Keller should be reported

And maybe you should try reading my post. I asked if there had been a Sturt report hence the ?. And where did I say it wasn't his 1st kick?

[topcat10]

And I asked why there WOULD be a report? Seeing Jimmy had already posted that Harmes 1st kick in footy was a goal,why bother with saying that his "2nd touch'" was a goal - posting for the sake of getting reply ??