Re: Rumours and Player Movement Discussions for 2014
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 1:31 am
Will be interesting to see how many magpie players move clubs, I'm guessing the majority of them would.
Brad wrote:Luke Slattery from the magpies back to his junior side Crystal Brook.
Dogwatcher wrote:Brad wrote:Luke Slattery from the magpies back to his junior side Crystal Brook.
Is that happening? I posted that as a joke on FB, mate.
Blackwhite wrote:Will be interesting to see how many magpie players move clubs, I'm guessing the majority of them would.
beenreal wrote: Or perhaps many of them will have higher standards and maintain their support for the Port Adelaide Football Club
Brad wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Brad wrote:Luke Slattery from the magpies back to his junior side Crystal Brook.
Is that happening? I posted that as a joke on FB, mate.
DW your joke us actually a reality I've been told!
passionatelegsfan wrote:An article in the paper today about Norwood looking to recruit a trio of delisted AFL players. However i thought they were banned from recruiting due to their salary cap breach. Can someone explain how this works?
Alby_Green wrote:passionatelegsfan wrote:An article in the paper today about Norwood looking to recruit a trio of delisted AFL players. However i thought they were banned from recruiting due to their salary cap breach. Can someone explain how this works?
Norwood can recruit former 'Legs players, e.g., those who have been delisted from their AFL club. Also, can recruit 3 players outside of the Norwood zone to replace the 3 home-grown Norwood boys lost to the filth at Alberton & West Lakes as a result of the AFL reserves fiasco.
Brad wrote:Alby_Green wrote:passionatelegsfan wrote:An article in the paper today about Norwood looking to recruit a trio of delisted AFL players. However i thought they were banned from recruiting due to their salary cap breach. Can someone explain how this works?
Norwood can recruit former 'Legs players, e.g., those who have been delisted from their AFL club. Also, can recruit 3 players outside of the Norwood zone to replace the 3 home-grown Norwood boys lost to the filth at Alberton & West Lakes as a result of the AFL reserves fiasco.
So they haven't really been punished, double standards by the SANFL yet again....
SDK wrote:Wrong again. The concessions were for ALL clubs the proposal to lift Norwood and West's recruiting ban was rejected.
Like all clubs Norwood are allowed to replace the players lost to the AFL reserves side. We can not recruit out of our area still. No change !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Alby_Green wrote:passionatelegsfan wrote:An article in the paper today about Norwood looking to recruit a trio of delisted AFL players. However i thought they were banned from recruiting due to their salary cap breach. Can someone explain how this works?
Norwood can recruit former 'Legs players, e.g., those who have been delisted from their AFL club. Also, can recruit 3 players outside of the Norwood zone to replace the 3 home-grown Norwood boys lost to the filth at Alberton & West Lakes as a result of the AFL reserves fiasco.
Well Norwood were punished for the breach, but later there was a deal done over the entry of AFL reserves into the SANFL which resulted in teams being able to replace players lost because of the AFL reserves forming. Norwood still cannot recruit players from outside their zone beyond this limit.Brad wrote:So they haven't really been punished, double standards by the SANFL yet again....Alby_Green wrote:Norwood can recruit former 'Legs players, e.g., those who have been delisted from their AFL club. Also, can recruit 3 players outside of the Norwood zone to replace the 3 home-grown Norwood boys lost to the filth at Alberton & West Lakes as a result of the AFL reserves fiasco.passionatelegsfan wrote:An article in the paper today about Norwood looking to recruit a trio of delisted AFL players. However i thought they were banned from recruiting due to their salary cap breach. Can someone explain how this works?