eaglehaslanded wrote:Winning the Ken Farmer Medal means you are the best full forward in the comp. It's an open and shut case. Mark Passador.
Winning the Ken Farmer Medal means hekicked the most goals for the year - and that is all it means.
by Duckman » Wed Sep 13, 2006 2:31 pm
eaglehaslanded wrote:Winning the Ken Farmer Medal means you are the best full forward in the comp. It's an open and shut case. Mark Passador.
by MST » Wed Sep 13, 2006 5:21 pm
by BPBRB » Wed Sep 13, 2006 8:20 pm
MST wrote:Chambers easily for mine.
- Played in the second worst attack in the competition.
- Played for the side with the worst defence in the competition, therefore the ball spent a hell of a lot of time up the other end of the ground.
- Had a mistake riddled midfield 'delivering' him the footy. As has been mentioned before, the likes of Passador and Schell get it on a silver platter from some of the most skilled players in the competition, and from players who get it more often.
- Missed two games through suspension.
- Works his arse off when he hasn't got the footy and for all of these reasons will be named the P.T Morton Medal Winner at the SFC Best & Fairest.
Simply put, had Chambers been playing in a top three side this year he would have slotted 80+ without any problem at all.
He is loyal to the end despite other clubs trying to entice him over each off-season.
by bluestheboy » Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:26 pm
Put simply, if he played in a top three side he would have had less opportunity. Look at Fev in the AFL...carlton had very few attacking options and looked for him most of the time. Chambers fits the same bill...MST wrote:Simply put, had Chambers been playing in a top three side this year he would have slotted 80+ without any problem at all.
by heater31 » Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:41 pm
bluestheboy wrote:Put simply, if he played in a top three side he would have had less opportunity. Look at Fev in the AFL...carlton had very few attacking options and looked for him most of the time. Chambers fits the same bill...MST wrote:Simply put, had Chambers been playing in a top three side this year he would have slotted 80+ without any problem at all.
Both obviously very good players but history says that Passador won the Ken Farmer and that is the league award for the most successful FF.
by bluestheboy » Thu Sep 14, 2006 5:27 pm
by bulldogproud » Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:17 pm
by FlyingHigh » Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:49 pm
by Wedgie » Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:53 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:And if you all think Chambers effort is great, how do you rate Blight in '85 and Pierson '82 (one win), who bothh kicked 100+ when Woodville finished bottom?
by Jimmy » Fri Sep 15, 2006 10:24 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:BP I agree that Schell is the most dangerous FF in the comp, especially with his pace and leap. Chambers is solely a FF or FP. Being more versatile makes Passador more dangerous for us - how many goals have Lindsay, Westbrook, Skipworth (against North) kicked when they've been the key forward for a stint and Passador has been up the ground? If he was att FF all day, he would have kicked 90, but then we mighnt'nt have won as many games.
And if you all think Chambers effort is great, how do you rate Blight in '85 and Pierson '82 (one win), who bothh kicked 100+ when Woodville finished bottom?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |