SA Footy

And you go on about "integrity"......go figure.

Anyway, I guess anything Sturt can do to get people through the gate to watch the game is good for them. They need the money as much as anyone and a bit of controversy wont hurt.

Booney wrote:And you go on about "integrity"......go figure.

And YOUR Club is so full of Integrity, aren't they?
Again, does the name Bruce Webber mean anything to you?

Booney wrote:Anyway, I guess anything Sturt can do to get people through the gate to watch the game is good for them. They need the money as much as anyone and a bit of controversy wont hurt.

Im guessing that was the motivation rather than a political protest as such.

The only pity is that it's taken so long for Sturt to make a statement, however small, against the Plastic Powerpies. Hope they make a similar statement on the weekend, when I'll be making my own small statement by doing a spot of gardening

Dutchy wrote:

Booney wrote:Anyway, I guess anything Sturt can do to get people through the gate to watch the game is good for them. They need the money as much as anyone and a bit of controversy wont hurt.

Im guessing that was the motivation rather than a political protest as such.

Absolutely, if they wanted to make any sort of relevant protest they would have voted no.

Or stayed home and done some gardening.

bad publicity is good publicity

Booney wrote:Anyway, I guess anything Sturt can do to get people through the gate to watch the game is good for them. They need the money as much as anyone and a bit of controversy wont hurt.

Yeah I mean what options do they have. Hang on they could keep on spending money like a p*ssed sailor and then ask for handout after handout. Seems to work for some.

Doesn't look too bad at all, I kinda like it.

wild dog wrote:

Booney wrote:Anyway, I guess anything Sturt can do to get people through the gate to watch the game is good for them. They need the money as much as anyone and a bit of controversy wont hurt.

Yeah I mean what options do they have. Hang on they could keep on spending money like a p*ssed sailor and then ask for handout after handout. Seems to work for some.

We had money to spend?!?!?

Of course, you'll have the answers at hand?

Didn't I read somewhere; Summerton $400 per game?

Booney wrote:

wild dog wrote:

Booney wrote:Anyway, I guess anything Sturt can do to get people through the gate to watch the game is good for them. They need the money as much as anyone and a bit of controversy wont hurt.

Yeah I mean what options do they have. Hang on they could keep on spending money like a p*ssed sailor and then ask for handout after handout. Seems to work for some.

We had money to spend?!?!?

Of course, you'll have the answers at hand?

That's the point Booney.

You will get it eventually me old mucker, and I wont have to provide the answers.

wild dog wrote:

Booney wrote:

wild dog wrote:

Booney wrote:Anyway, I guess anything Sturt can do to get people through the gate to watch the game is good for them. They need the money as much as anyone and a bit of controversy wont hurt.

Yeah I mean what options do they have. Hang on they could keep on spending money like a p*ssed sailor and then ask for handout after handout. Seems to work for some.

We had money to spend?!?!?

Of course, you'll have the answers at hand?

That's the point Booney.

You will get it eventually me old mucker, and I wont have to provide the answers.

Of course! We should have not paid players, coaches, admin staff.....

That's correct! When business goes bust & receivers are brought in, no one gets paid.
Oh wait a minute - PAFC sought advances on AFL Dividends in order to survive, didn't they?
No sign of the AFL Franchise Arm of the 'One Club' coming to their rescue then - it was the other 8 SANFL Clubs that gave them the money!

Perhaps.
But even the Merry-go-round @ Semaphore has bills to pay!

kickinit wrote:Just wondering does this rule still apply on SAFooty? Dutchy some of your recent posts make one think it's ok to troll now?

Read the fine print. It's acceptable to troll Port.

regards,

REB

LPH wrote:

Booney wrote:And you go on about "integrity"......go figure.

And YOUR Club is so full of Integrity, aren't they?
Again, does the name Bruce Webber mean anything to you?

1990 will live on forever..........

Chris Davies was allegedly quite upset. Maybe he should be more concerned about the inequity of television coverage and total loss of integrity in the competition. Lapdog.

CUTTERMAN wrote:Chris Davies was allegedly quite upset. Maybe he should be more concerned about the inequity of television coverage and total loss of integrity in the competition. Lapdog.

Come on mate, the awesome telly coverage (we're paying for but don't mention that too often) is delivering unheard of sponsorship riches for the eight clubs. They've all got RSI from counting money apparently.