by tipper » Thu Oct 12, 2017 11:07 am
by Magellan » Thu Oct 12, 2017 11:23 am
tipper wrote:any further news on this review? it seems to be taking an awfully long time, and considering it was said to be an "in season" review, and the season finished a couple of weeks ago (longer for North) they seem to be taking their time.
i would have thought that they would want to enact any of the recommendations that come out of it in time for recruiting for next season (which may already be underway??) they really need to pull their fingers out. or will any results from the review be kept to the chosen few?
by Booney » Thu Oct 12, 2017 12:13 pm
Magellan wrote:tipper wrote:any further news on this review? it seems to be taking an awfully long time, and considering it was said to be an "in season" review, and the season finished a couple of weeks ago (longer for North) they seem to be taking their time.
i would have thought that they would want to enact any of the recommendations that come out of it in time for recruiting for next season (which may already be underway??) they really need to pull their fingers out. or will any results from the review be kept to the chosen few?
I think the review has been completed, and the board will now review its findings before deciding what it wants to present. I guess it'll be at their next meeting, but I don't know when that is.
My understanding the board's translation of the review would be publicly available, but the question is not who can access it but rather what the board says is wrong and what they're going to fix.
by tipper » Thu Oct 12, 2017 12:34 pm
Booney wrote:Magellan wrote:tipper wrote:any further news on this review? it seems to be taking an awfully long time, and considering it was said to be an "in season" review, and the season finished a couple of weeks ago (longer for North) they seem to be taking their time.
i would have thought that they would want to enact any of the recommendations that come out of it in time for recruiting for next season (which may already be underway??) they really need to pull their fingers out. or will any results from the review be kept to the chosen few?
I think the review has been completed, and the board will now review its findings before deciding what it wants to present. I guess it'll be at their next meeting, but I don't know when that is.
My understanding the board's translation of the review would be publicly available, but the question is not who can access it but rather what the board says is wrong and what they're going to fix.
I wonder if the board will find the board is the right board to be the board?
by Pseudo » Thu Oct 12, 2017 3:37 pm
by Magellan » Thu Oct 12, 2017 3:41 pm
Pseudo wrote:Did the board review begin with a few dirty jokes to break the ice, or was that considered too bawd-y?
by Pseudo » Thu Oct 12, 2017 4:01 pm
Magellan wrote:Pseudo wrote:Did the board review begin with a few dirty jokes to break the ice, or was that considered too bawd-y?
No, I hear meetings always kick off with liberal does of black raspberry liqueur. Members say its a Cham, bord says otherwise.
by Ian » Thu Oct 12, 2017 4:03 pm
Booney wrote:Magellan wrote:tipper wrote:any further news on this review? it seems to be taking an awfully long time, and considering it was said to be an "in season" review, and the season finished a couple of weeks ago (longer for North) they seem to be taking their time.
i would have thought that they would want to enact any of the recommendations that come out of it in time for recruiting for next season (which may already be underway??) they really need to pull their fingers out. or will any results from the review be kept to the chosen few?
I think the review has been completed, and the board will now review its findings before deciding what it wants to present. I guess it'll be at their next meeting, but I don't know when that is.
My understanding the board's translation of the review would be publicly available, but the question is not who can access it but rather what the board says is wrong and what they're going to fix.
I wonder if the board will find the board is the right board to be the board?
by tipper » Thu Oct 12, 2017 4:06 pm
Pseudo wrote:Magellan wrote:Pseudo wrote:Did the board review begin with a few dirty jokes to break the ice, or was that considered too bawd-y?
No, I hear meetings always kick off with liberal does of black raspberry liqueur. Members say its a Cham, bord says otherwise.
Cham-bord? Meh. I'd have opted for a nice Bord-eaux myself...
by Pseudo » Thu Oct 12, 2017 4:17 pm
tipper wrote:Pseudo wrote:Magellan wrote:Pseudo wrote:Did the board review begin with a few dirty jokes to break the ice, or was that considered too bawd-y?
No, I hear meetings always kick off with liberal does of black raspberry liqueur. Members say its a Cham, bord says otherwise.
Cham-bord? Meh. I'd have opted for a nice Bord-eaux myself...
then off to the bordello once the meeting is over?
by Booney » Thu Oct 12, 2017 4:23 pm
by Magellan » Thu Oct 12, 2017 4:24 pm
Pseudo wrote:Magellan wrote:Pseudo wrote:Did the board review begin with a few dirty jokes to break the ice, or was that considered too bawd-y?
No, I hear meetings always kick off with liberal does of black raspberry liqueur. Members say its a Cham, bord says otherwise.
Cham-bord? Meh. I'd have opted for a nice Bord-eaux myself...
by UK Fan » Thu Oct 12, 2017 5:51 pm
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Wedgie » Thu Oct 12, 2017 6:05 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by am Bays » Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:18 pm
Pseudo wrote:tipper wrote:Pseudo wrote:Magellan wrote:No, I hear meetings always kick off with liberal does of black raspberry liqueur. Members say its a Cham, bord says otherwise.
Cham-bord? Meh. I'd have opted for a nice Bord-eaux myself...
then off to the bordello once the meeting is over?
J'aurais preferé aller au bordel tout d'abord...
by Magellan » Fri Oct 13, 2017 4:58 am
UK Fan wrote:Just piss off Meggsy simple. The man is useless
Send him to Carlton as triggs replacement.
by tipper » Fri Oct 27, 2017 3:20 pm
by Wedgie » Fri Oct 27, 2017 3:41 pm
tipper wrote:still nothing on this??
tick tock tick tock.......
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by tipper » Fri Oct 27, 2017 4:22 pm
by Wedgie » Fri Oct 27, 2017 4:35 pm
tipper wrote:Cheers for the update wedgie. Looks like something might finally be happening with it.
Hopefully some change for the better is implemented soon.
Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |