by RustyCage » Thu Jan 25, 2007 8:48 pm
by Dutchy » Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:22 pm
by smac » Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:12 am
I would have expected Wedgie to have a shot at you for being too general in your comments here Aerie. Obviously this one's ok.Aerie wrote:Would have to be Central because they've been the hardest team to beat.
To be really general...
Sturt and North supporters p*ss me off with their upper class arrogance.
Central and Port supporters p*ss me off with their mob mentality and general feralness.
Norwood and Glenelg p*ss me off because they're still living in the 80's (Glenelg 1980's and Norwood 1880's).
South and West supporters are ok.....
One of these...... is probably needed for this post, because I'm only being serious!
by Snaggletooth Tiger » Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:06 am
Aerie wrote:Norwood and Glenelg p*ss me off because they're still living in the 80's (Glenelg 1980's and Norwood 1880's).
by MightyEagles » Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:08 am
by MightyEagles » Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:10 am
BPBRB wrote:Aerie wrote:Would have to be Central because they've been the hardest team to beat.
To be really general...
Sturt and North supporters p*ss me off with their upper class arrogance.
Central and Port supporters p*ss me off with their mob mentality and general feralness.
Norwood and Glenelg p*ss me off because they're still living in the 80's (Glenelg 1980's and Norwood 1880's).
South and West supporters are ok.....
One of these...... is probably needed for this post, because I'm only being serious!
Goods post!
P.S. Thanks for recognising our social standing at Prospect! Now go away peasant!![]()
by Spiritof64 » Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:39 am
by Dog_ger » Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:13 pm
by Booney » Sat Jan 27, 2007 10:14 am
by Wedgie » Sat Jan 27, 2007 10:16 am
Booney wrote:Norwood very closely followed by North.North only in recent years,the standing they (the supporters) seem to think the club holds in every ones opinion is overstated.
by Booney » Sat Jan 27, 2007 10:27 am
by BPBRB » Sat Jan 27, 2007 10:55 am
Booney wrote:Norwood very closely followed by North.North only in recent years,the standing they (the supporters) seem to think the club holds in every ones opinion is overstated.
by Rik E Boy » Sat Jan 27, 2007 11:51 am
BPBRB wrote:Booney wrote:Norwood very closely followed by North.North only in recent years,the standing they (the supporters) seem to think the club holds in every ones opinion is overstated.
WTF do you mean by that Booney???
by Barto » Sat Jan 27, 2007 4:19 pm
by Rik E Boy » Sat Jan 27, 2007 8:21 pm
Barto wrote:Depends on when I'd be asked this question. In the dim dark past it might have been Port, North were a blip on the radr in the hated stakes, albeit it briefly. Always take pleasure in beating Norwood and Glenelg.
by Booney » Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:25 am
Rik E Boy wrote:BPBRB wrote:Booney wrote:Norwood very closely followed by North.North only in recent years,the standing they (the supporters) seem to think the club holds in every ones opinion is overstated.
WTF do you mean by that Booney???
He means that you blokes think you're top shelf even though you haven't won a flag since 1991. But Wedgie is probably right too, Booney doesn't like losing at Alberton to the Roosters. Maybe your fans have been picking on him!![]()
regards,
REB
by Wedgie » Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:03 pm
Booney wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:BPBRB wrote:Booney wrote:Norwood very closely followed by North.North only in recent years,the standing they (the supporters) seem to think the club holds in every ones opinion is overstated.
WTF do you mean by that Booney???
He means that you blokes think you're top shelf even though you haven't won a flag since 1991. But Wedgie is probably right too, Booney doesn't like losing at Alberton to the Roosters. Maybe your fans have been picking on him!![]()
regards,
REB
Exactly what I mean,well put.
by JK » Tue Jan 30, 2007 9:17 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |