Jimmy wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:a waste of time Jimmy? Why so?
must clarify.....more so the dialogue about the 'flashy finals footy' as it was easy to see it wasnt meant to cause a stir yet it did....and it happens like that so often....not so much the whole thread about the dogs ins and outs...that is interesting itself.

Using the word 'flashy' to describe a team will always get the hackles up. When I played junior footy, the 'flashy' player was the guy who played for himself, didn't do the hard things, went for big marks and goals, didn't play on wet days, bit soft, etc ....... Maybe Mal didn't mean it like that but no-one wants to be called 'flashy'
