Jimmy wrote:BPBRB wrote:MST wrote: To match it with North in the second half was, despite the final margin and the poor performance in the first half, pretty encouraging. Play that same game this time last season and we would have lost by 12 goals +.
The Blues are on the right track I am sure of it.
15 minutes of football when North went to sleep, content that it was all over,
is not matching it for a half. It took us about 5 minutes to get the lead back to safe despite your 5 goal burst and cruised home in 2nd gear to win by 46 points. You should have lost by 12 goals minimum in all reality.
i dont think he said 'for a half' he said 'IN the second half'. Bit of a difference there.
Simply tho, North were too good on the day and we have plenty of work to go to get back to playing good footy.
Ha, ha.... I knew as soon as I hit the 'submit' button on that particular post that my ol' mate Drebin would take me to task.
Obviously we did only play 15 mins of good footy but the point I was making, quite clearly too but here it is again for those in the cheap seats, is in a similar situation last year Sturt would have completely dropped their bundle and lost by 12+. That we didn't and showed some real quality, albeit for a short period, is most encouraging and a real positive to take out of an ordinary day.
Even Jar's himself offered a compliment post match, suggersting we were worthy opponents who would cause sides some grief in the 'second half of the year'.
Cheers Andrew Newton but I would like to think we will stir a few sides up much sooner than that, starting with the Eags this Saturday.
Go Blues!