central v the rest combined who'd win ?

[mal]

At Adelaide Oval on a dry day
REST 30-18
CENTRALS 7-10

At Lizzy Oval on a dry day
REST 22-12
CENTRALS 7-10

REST TEAM [no AFL players can play]

ALLEN...............CHAMBERS....................VLATKO
LADHAMS..........ALLEWAY.......................CUPIDO
SUMMERTON......MOTLOP........................BACKWELL
HOLLANDS.........MCKENZIE.....................MCGUINESS
CICOLEELA.........AHCHEE........................HOWARD

LINDSAY
SHEEDY
KENNA

INTERCHANGE
PARRY
BORLACE
CRANE

That team would beat Centrals.
Only Wayne Weed would disagree

who said no afl players can play i stated in my ? that at full strength which includes their afl adelaide/port based players, my ? mal my rules not yours old son

So if it included the AFL listed players wouldn't the combined side be a combined side of the Crows and Port minus those aligned to Central? All players from Port and the Crows are aligned to an SANFL club.

OK ROD ROOSTER rules
Include all crows/power players and sanfl 8 teams vrs CD
result
REST 40-15
CENTRALS 4-4

[doggies4eva]

At Adelaide Oval on a dry day
REST 30-18
CENTRALS 7-10

At Lizzy Oval on a dry day
REST 22-12
CENTRALS 7-10

REST TEAM [no AFL players can play]

ALLEN...............CHAMBERS....................VLATKO
LADHAMS..........ALLEWAY.......................CUPIDO
SUMMERTON......MOTLOP........................BACKWELL
HOLLANDS.........MCKENZIE.....................MCGUINESS
CICOLEELA.........AHCHEE........................HOWARD

LINDSAY
SHEEDY
KENNA

INTERCHANGE
PARRY
BORLACE
CRANE

That team would beat Centrals.
Only Wayne Weed would disagree

who said no afl players can play i stated in my ? that at full strength which includes their afl adelaide/port based players, my ? mal my rules not yours old son

So if it included the AFL listed players wouldn't the combined side be a combined side of the Crows and Port minus those aligned to Central? All players from Port and the Crows are aligned to an SANFL club.

OK ROD ROOSTER rules
Include all crows/power players and sanfl 8 teams vrs CD
result
REST 40-15
CENTRALS 4-4

No way. We would flood and play ugly footy and water the oval. The Rest would be lucky to get 20 goals.

[SnappyTom]

No way. We would flood and play ugly footy and water the oval. The Rest would be lucky to get 20 goals.

Goes to show you how weird 49.23.317 was, in 1975...

[bayman]

At Adelaide Oval on a dry day
REST 30-18
CENTRALS 7-10

At Lizzy Oval on a dry day
REST 22-12
CENTRALS 7-10

REST TEAM [no AFL players can play]

ALLEN...............CHAMBERS....................VLATKO
LADHAMS..........ALLEWAY.......................CUPIDO
SUMMERTON......MOTLOP........................BACKWELL
HOLLANDS.........MCKENZIE.....................MCGUINESS
CICOLEELA.........AHCHEE........................HOWARD

LINDSAY
SHEEDY
KENNA

INTERCHANGE
PARRY
BORLACE
CRANE

That team would beat Centrals.
Only Wayne Weed would disagree

who said no afl players can play i stated in my ? that at full strength which includes their afl adelaide/port based players, my ? mal my rules not yours old son

So if it included the AFL listed players wouldn't the combined side be a combined side of the Crows and Port minus those aligned to Central? All players from Port and the Crows are aligned to an SANFL club.

no dont get too technical, i'll say it clearly the afl players that would be eligible to play finals ie 3 sanfl games

[twosheds]

Irony lost on you a bit, buddy?

PS, not sure if you've noticed but I'm not playing. I don't need to get back to basics at all. In fact, I think I'm in pretty good form with my stirring right now.

Hardly "irony" more as you say just "stirring". A little pointless but perhaps mildly amusing to the psychologically flawed on here, probably worthy of being posted on "BigFooty".

Now that's what I call an arguement

No it isn't!

[doggies4eva]

Irony lost on you a bit, buddy?

PS, not sure if you've noticed but I'm not playing. I don't need to get back to basics at all. In fact, I think I'm in pretty good form with my stirring right now.

Hardly "irony" more as you say just "stirring". A little pointless but perhaps mildly amusing to the psychologically flawed on here, probably worthy of being posted on "BigFooty".

Now that's what I call an arguement

No it isn't!

An argument isn't simply denying what the other person says

[stampy]

get a grip willya?

[Aerie]

Hardly "irony" more as you say just "stirring". A little pointless but perhaps mildly amusing to the psychologically flawed on here, probably worthy of being posted on "BigFooty".

Now that's what I call an arguement

No it isn't!

An argument isn't simply denying what the other person says

Yes it is!

[doggies4eva]

No it isn't!

An argument isn't simply denying what the other person says

Yes it is![/quote]

Is this the $5 or $10 argument?

[johntheclaret]

[daveswar]

Umm that would be the 5 minute argument or the full 1/2 hour. I think the being hit on the head lessons are taking their toll. I just love python

[twosheds]

Geez Johntheclaret you're rolling your eyes at Python, I feel sorry for you. Oh and I'll have the full half hour thanks.

[doggies4eva]

Geez Johntheclaret you're rolling your eyes at Python, I feel sorry for you. Oh and I'll have the full half hour thanks.

You haven't paid yet

[doggies4eva]

:roll:

It's people like you what cause unrest

[GWW]

I reckon Carlton might just scrape in against Centrals at Elizabeth.

[johntheclaret]

Geez Johntheclaret you're rolling your eyes at Python, I feel sorry for you. Oh and I'll have the full half hour thanks.

No I'm not.

Whilst I didn't make it clear, I am rolling my eyes at this thread.
Seemed that Sturt provided the answer for everyone.

And noboby expects the Spanish Inquisition

[johntheclaret]

:roll:

It's people like you what cause unrest

By "people like you" I assume you mean people that don't go along with a poinless hypothetical, that was answered by Sturt the following week.

The Dogs have had a good start to the season, and agreed they are a better team on the whole than any other individual side, ATM, in the SANFL, but to debate whether they would / could be a combined SANFL team, well

[doggies4eva]

:roll:

It's people like you what cause unrest

By "people like you" I assume you mean people that don't go along with a poinless hypothetical, that was answered by Sturt the following week.

The Dogs have had a good start to the season, and agreed they are a better team on the whole than any other individual side, ATM, in the SANFL, but to debate whether they would / could be a combined SANFL team, well

Agreed that's why I'd rather turn this thread into a Monty Python nostalgia thread - makes it a little less absurd. Anway, get your own arts show you fairy.

[twosheds]

:roll:

It's people like you what cause unrest

By "people like you" I assume you mean people that don't go along with a poinless hypothetical, that was answered by Sturt the following week.

The Dogs have had a good start to the season, and agreed they are a better team on the whole than any other individual side, ATM, in the SANFL, but to debate whether they would / could be a combined SANFL team, well

Agreed that's why I'd rather turn this thread into a Monty Python nostalgia thread - makes it a little less absurd. Anway, get your own arts show you fairy.

This is typical!!! This is exactly the pig headed philistine ignorance i've come to expect from you, you whining snivelling little toady sitting there ( in Darwin ) with your colour T.V. set and your Tony Jacklin golf clubs not giving a tinkers cuss about the upcoming artist. Doggies 4 eva do you think he gets it now?

[Dirko]

Carlton..you've got to be joking....give us 10 goals in at least...