Fighting at the Footy

[Strawb]

At least alcohol can't be blamed, $5 for a bloody can of beer at Unley ($4.50 at the Bay and $4.00 at Prospect).

And we are all normally broke after paying for petrol to get to the match and after a big friday night.

[Snaggletooth Tiger]

I was at game (just before last quarter) didn't see the fighting but was standing in front of grand stand and heard Sturt's Mr Angry- what a d!ckhead.
Very good crowd and well done to Sturt.

I'm so f'n glad I didn't see ya there, missed the biffo too!
Had more important things to do like get the last round of beers in before they finally & predictably ran out!

[blues2002]

At least alcohol can't be blamed, $5 for a bloody can of beer at Unley ($4.50 at the Bay and $4.00 at Prospect).

Yeah the prices suck. But at least they had TEDs (until 3/4 time) then I had to drink New, yuck

[Apachebulldog]

I wonder if KERMIT KORNES and KRAZY KUNNINGHAM will mention this next week on the CROW show, if they do i bet they will blame the Central supporters once again and not opposition supporters ???? lol !!!!!!!!!!!

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[LBT]

Get the chip off ya shoulder doggies fans. How many posts have to meantion the person was in bloods colours.

[Dutchy]

Get the chip off ya shoulder doggies fans. How many posts have to meantion the person was in bloods colours.

unreal isnt it....they say they dont want the publicity, yet when an incident happens that doesnt involve them they come in and bring their club into the arguement!!!....FFS

[Apachebulldog]

Ooops sorry it must of been those feral Sturt and Port supporters !!!!!!!!!!

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF !!!!!!!

[Barto]

At least alcohol can't be blamed, $5 for a bloody can of beer at Unley ($4.50 at the Bay and $4.00 at Prospect).

That's cheap if you're used to paying $5 for a cup of mid strength urine at Subiaco.

[Barto]

Get the chip off ya shoulder doggies fans. How many posts have to meantion the person was in bloods colours.

unreal isnt it....they say they dont want the publicity, yet when an incident happens that doesnt involve them they come in and bring their club into the arguement!!!....FFS

I think we should challenge someone to ring up 5 Double Crow and mention it was someone in Centrals gear.

[am Bays]

Get the chip off ya shoulder doggies fans. How many posts have to meantion the person was in bloods colours.

unreal isnt it....they say they dont want the publicity, yet when an incident happens that doesnt involve them they come in and bring their club into the arguement!!!....FFS

I think we should challenge someone to ring up 5 Double Crow and mention it was someone in Centrals gear.

No a Centrals supporter in westies gear (stolen) trying to divert the blame onto another club by causing trouble wearing that clubs colours....

[Apachebulldog]

It was probably Krazy Kunnyham and his dipstick Kermit who started the fracas !!!!!!!!!!!!

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Apachebulldog]

Good one Tassie luv it lol lol !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[magpie in the 80's]

Re: R11: Port v Sturt Review

Sam_goUUUdogs wrote:
from when i saw it, 3 or 4 weslo's had 2 guys outside pinned down, a couple of the security guards where laying into one bloke, who's wife/gf tried to get them off him, then the guy in Westies gear started swinging at her, im pretty sure one did connect.

Pseudo wrote:
I almost believed you, but you make it sound like Weslo actually did some proactive security work.

Sam_goUUUdogswrote:
if anything they aggravated the situation, both guys were outside the ground and seperated, but Weslo saw the need to start punching the sturt supporter while he was pinned up against a car, bringing his gf into the picture, and starting the whole thing up again worse than it was to begin with.

SeptemberSpecialists wrote:
yet if you look at the sturt website they have a different version.... no guy in a westies jumper....?

http://www.doubleblue.org/forum/viewtop ... &start=180

I walked past the incident as I was leaving. The security guy's had one Sturt supporter & a Port supporter restrained as they waited for the police.

Apparently what happened (from asking Sturt & Port supporters who witnessed the incident) was these two supporters were arguing and confronting each other. It must of been fairly heated as the (girlfriend/ wife / partner or whatever is politically correct) of the Sturt supported threw a few (and connected with quite a few on the Port supporter). The Port supporter reacted and decked the female.

Then it was apparently it was on between the 2 men. As I was walking past when the police had arrived and I could still see the female having some strong words towards the Port supporter. I could only imagine what was said.

So it sounds like the sturt woman threw a few punches at the port supporter so he defended himself by throwing one back at her. Then her boyfriend stepped in. I don't feel any pity towards the woman if that's what happened.

[Jimmy]

very disappointed that this shit happens.

ban the guilty parties!

[Dogwatcher]

Get the chip off ya shoulder doggies fans. How many posts have to meantion the person was in bloods colours.

If you look through the entire thread, you'll see it was actually two North fans who brought Centrals into the equation.
They were using sarcasm.


On topic, sorry to see/hear about this. It doesn't reflect the true fans.

[CENTURION]

The commom denominator seems to be when "The Haves" play "The Have Nots"!

[redwhiteandblueblooded]

Well the answer is obvious. Sturt and Port are no longer allowed to play each other on saturday afternoons. Oh no, thats right, these draconian measures only apply when the problem involves trouble at Centrals games.

[johntheclaret]

very disappointed that this shit happens.

ban the guilty parties!

Where were you at the time of the incident Jimmy. Do you have a rock solid alibi?

[Dutchy]

Get the chip off ya shoulder doggies fans. How many posts have to meantion the person was in bloods colours.

If you look through the entire thread, you'll see it was actually two North fans who brought Centrals into the equation.
They were using sarcasm.

Check out the other thread DW

[Sojourner]

I am not sure that the SANFL can really do any more to prevent brawling at the footy, they already have set up family friendly areas where they are quite definate about what behaviour can occur in there, that measure seems to be one of the things that has increased SANFL attendances in recent years.

Fighting most certainly happens at AFL venues at AFL games, they just dont publicise it. Adelaide oval has its share of fights in the afternoon - evening of one day matches, last time I was there two people were belting the hell out of each other with wooden chairs!

People can enjoy themselves without any fear of violence at an SANFL game, simply take a seat in the family area and if on the way to your car on the way home some drunken bogan happens to give you a mouthfull simply ignore them. Yet often when these incidents happen it is because drunken bogan a, meets drunken bogan b, and there is little that the SANFL can do about that. People that get seriously tanked at the football have usually brought in something stronger than what is available at the ground anyway.

The SANFL should get on the front foot and advertise the family friendly areas on their TV ad and have people give the other side of the story that an afternoon out an SANFL game is one of the best value entertainment items you can come by in winter in S.A!