woodwt wrote:Its about time he done something!
Just a shame he waited until today to do it

by johntheclaret » Sun Jul 15, 2007 11:07 pm
woodwt wrote:Its about time he done something!
by spell_check » Sun Jul 15, 2007 11:08 pm
woodwt wrote:Its about time he done something!
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:31 am
Wedgie wrote:snowman wrote:Was it an off day for North or did port play to there true potential??
North don't have off days, North have "mentally insipid" days all the time when a bit of pressure occurs. (feel free to call it choking, soft, etc, same thing)
On top of that the Maggies played great today, probably didn't lose a possie on the whole ground.
The rest of the comp must be stoked that after we ran Glenelg back into form that we've now done the same for Port.
by Ian » Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:24 am
North did have an "off day" against Glenelg, they also had another yesterday.mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Wedgie wrote:snowman wrote:Was it an off day for North or did port play to there true potential??
North don't have off days, North have "mentally insipid" days all the time when a bit of pressure occurs. (feel free to call it choking, soft, etc, same thing)
On top of that the Maggies played great today, probably didn't lose a possie on the whole ground.
The rest of the comp must be stoked that after we ran Glenelg back into form that we've now done the same for Port.
i believe you and BP would disagree, because he seems to think that north had an off day against glenelg.......
thanks for putting port back in the fight for the 5!!!!!!!!!!!
by am Bays » Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:29 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:i believe you and BP would disagree, because he seems to think that north had an off day against glenelg.......
thanks for putting port back in the fight for the 5!!!!!!!!!!!
by BPBRB » Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:47 am
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:i believe you and BP would disagree, because he seems to think that north had an off day against glenelg.......
thanks for putting port back in the fight for the 5!!!!!!!!!!!
BPBRB stated to me at the Bay that North we're "soft" that day - poor attitude - call it an off day / soft whatever but he basically said the same as what Wedgie said above.
by rd » Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:12 pm
by footynut » Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:33 pm
by MagicKiwi » Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:50 pm
by Dog_ger » Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:49 pm
by JK » Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:51 pm
by Punk Rooster » Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:21 pm
footynut wrote:Hargs is just one of many poor recruiting / delisting decisions Jarman has made in his time as coach.
Consider delistings Hargraves, Grocke, Gum,
I think you'll find ANJ dropped the clown act a long time go- get over it.footynut wrote:Expensive recruits Ohara,
It must be hard to take a bloke seriously when he is so far into himself and his clown act.
If they dont make the GF this year then he must be considered a failure with the money they have spent on recruiting.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Coorong » Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:49 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:footynut wrote:Hargs is just one of many poor recruiting / delisting decisions Jarman has made in his time as coach.
Consider delistings Hargraves, Grocke, Gum,
Hargraves- moved on for disciplinary reasons/age factor (ANJ's call)
Grocke- moved on due to being about 5th in line for the CHF "Throne" (not ANJ's call)
Gum- allegedly did not want to work his way into the NAFC, after a year away, chose the "soft" option of playing with a (then) struggling club (not ANJ's call)I think you'll find ANJ dropped the clown act a long time go- get over it.footynut wrote:Expensive recruits Ohara,
It must be hard to take a bloke seriously when he is so far into himself and his clown act.
If they dont make the GF this year then he must be considered a failure with the money they have spent on recruiting.
Not making the GF- yes, I would consider that a wasted year.
As for money, it's not been splashed around like most would have you believe- where have all the high-priced recruits gone?
Not North Adelaide (Prendergast- South, LeCras- Port etc...)
by BPBRB » Tue Jul 17, 2007 8:40 am
footynut wrote:Hargs is just one of many poor recruiting / delisting decisions Jarman has made in his time as coach.
Consider delistings Hargraves, Grooke, Gum,
Expensive recruits Ohara,
It must be hard to take a bloke seriously when he is so far into himself and his clown act.
If they dont make the GF this year then he must be considered a failure with the money they have spent on recruiting.
by footynut » Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:17 pm
by pipers » Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:20 pm
BPBRB wrote:footynut wrote:Hargs is just one of many poor recruiting / delisting decisions Jarman has made in his time as coach.
Consider delistings Hargraves, Grooke, Gum,
Expensive recruits Ohara,
It must be hard to take a bloke seriously when he is so far into himself and his clown act.
If they dont make the GF this year then he must be considered a failure with the money they have spent on recruiting.
Spoken by someone who has no clue and you call Jars a clown? Stick to tarot cards you idiot and next time try and at least get the spelling of their names right seeing as you profess to know so much!
Well summed up Punk and spot on!
by Mic » Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:32 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |