2007 GrandFinal. Roosters V Dogs....

[haloman]

How long before Laird joins an AFL club guys? A more impressive SANFL coach there is not. I personally think he would make an exelent AFL coach, and the man knows how to win. His players give him everything, he has their respect, and obviously follow his instructions to the letter. Every Centrals player on the field seamed to know where they needed to position themselves on most occasions as oposed to North who, when they did get their hands on it, seamed to have little structure, especially going forward. Laird appears good tactician, exelent leader and great manager of people. Piss off Mumbles back to the Redlegs and bring on Laird............might win a final or two with him coaching.

[smac]

At the chimney presentation just now, Roy stated that 10 new premiership players under 23 were added to the club honour roll on the weekend. Pretty shiny future from that lot alone I reckon.

[am Bays]

The sooner a footballer sues the owners of this site for publishing defamatory material the better.

Welcome back mate....hope it is not so long between insightful posts...

[Dissident]

The sooner a footballer sues the owners of this site for publishing defamatory material the better.

Welcome back mate....hope it is not so long between insightful posts...

Defamatory is false information.
Unsure what was false here? *shrug*

Purely opinion.

[doggies4eva]

The sooner a footballer sues the owners of this site for publishing defamatory material the better.

Welcome back mate....hope it is not so long between insightful posts...

Defamatory is false information.
Unsure what was false here? *shrug*

Purely opinion.

Don't think your right Diss. Defamatory is any public statement which leads to loss of reputation. The agrrieved individual would have to show how the negative comments impacted on their welfare and prove a tangible loss for any damages to be paid.

[Punk Rooster]

The sooner a footballer sues the owners of this site for publishing defamatory material the better.

well, I'd like to make a defamatory remark about you- you're an idiot!
Oops, that's not defamatory, just fact....

[BPBRB]

The sooner a footballer sues the owners of this site for publishing defamatory material the better.

well, I'd like to make a defamatory remark about you- you're an idiot!
Oops, that's not defamatory, just fact....

LOL - he has a few mates on this site too as well and not just Centrals supporters.

[Dissident]

The sooner a footballer sues the owners of this site for publishing defamatory material the better.

Welcome back mate....hope it is not so long between insightful posts...

Defamatory is false information.
Unsure what was false here? *shrug*

Purely opinion.

Don't think your right Diss. Defamatory is any public statement which leads to loss of reputation. The agrrieved individual would have to show how the negative comments impacted on their welfare and prove a tangible loss for any damages to be paid.

Regardless, it usually is.
I can't imagine anything on this site at the moment being used in any form of lawsuit at ALL.

And comments on here affecting their welfare damages? Good luck

Some people should stick to drawing.




Christ, this is a forum FFS. What forum has 100% positive comments.

[redden whites]

Christ, this is a forum FFS. What forum has 100% positive comments.

Penthouse



Edited for PHPBB Code by Dissident

[Dogwatcher]

A question (and I think a valid one) has Shane Schubert been reported following Sunday?

[offensive_Line]

A question (and I think a valid one) has Shane Schubert been reported following Sunday?

Yes he has,

As a legend of the game for hitting Gowans.

Hope he gets a meal voucher at "Charlies" for his efforts.

Small-man syndrome will be the charge on Gowans...........again.

[smac]

A question (and I think a valid one) has Shane Schubert been reported following Sunday?

Yes he has,

As a legend of the game for hitting Gowans.

Hope he gets a meal voucher at "Charlies" for his efforts.

Small-man syndrome will be the charge on Gowans...........again.

Thanks for adding value.

I'm unsure if we have trial by video any more though do we? If we do, he may find himself in trouble.

[BPBRB]

A question (and I think a valid one) has Shane Schubert been reported following Sunday?

No and what would he be reported for?

[Dogwatcher]

As clearly shown on Channel 7 news on Monday night, the big fella clotheslined Gowans as he ran past him. The vision showed very clearly the incident.

Anyway, I didn't ask the question for a debate. I asked the question as I was curious to see if he had been. As he hasn't, I'm happy to leave it at that.

[Grahaml]

On the video you can see Schubert knocks Gowans to the ground, then gives Gowans a clip on the way past as he (Schubert) chases the ball. As soon as Gowans gets up you can see he's hell bent on catching Schubert and we all know what happens when he does. That was what Gowans was claiming he was squaring up for, but I couldn't quite tell what Schubert actually did because the angle was from directly behind.

I don't think the SANFL does trial by video though for some reason, but are Central allowed to present video evidence as part of a defense? Gowans will definitely get suspended, but the club will try to reduce the length of the suspension as much as they can.

[topsywaldron]

I'm unsure if we have trial by video any more though do we?

Didn't the rules get changed after Centrals squealed about Macca after the 1997 Prelim?

[smac]

I'm unsure if we have trial by video any more though do we?

Didn't the rules get changed after Centrals squealed about Macca after the 1997 Prelim?

I have no idea mate - I moved on. Hope you can too, some day.

[topsywaldron]

I'm unsure if we have trial by video any more though do we?

Didn't the rules get changed after Centrals squealed about Macca after the 1997 Prelim?

I have no idea mate - I moved on. Hope you can too, some day.

Not sure why my question warranted such a thin skinned response but you'd have your reasons I guess.

I've moved on from 1997, it's just a shame the club I support hasn't.

[smac]

Not thin skinned, just off the cuff treatment of your "squealing" comment. Play on.

Your club has moved on several times, it just hasn't worked out that it's on the Brittania Roundabout yet.

[BPBRB]

Not thin skinned, just off the cuff treatment of your "squealing" comment. Play on.

Your club has moved on several times, it just hasn't worked out that it's on the Brittania Roundabout yet.

LOL - Nwd aren't that bad to be compared to the infamous roundabout surely? Now that is a debacle!