SA Footy

More like piss & wind.

MW wrote: Why do you continue to believe alternative truths dogwatcher?
You need to separate hatred from facts and truths. Don't let it get you down to the point you don't know what you should believe anymore.

"Open your eyes and ears", as long as it's an AFC-sanctioned truth. Very Orwellian.
The fact is, a WAFC official posted this originally, why would he lie about something that would so easily be disproved? It's his credibility on the line.
The fact is, he deleted the post - if he did so because it was factually incorrect, I'd imagine an apology would have been made by WAFC. No apology or correction of the facts has been supplied by the WAFC or the official.
There's a truth in there somewhere, whether you like it or not.

Unless it is all one big misunderstanding then one group is lying. That is the really rank part, the incident itself is fairly trivial, it's the dishonesty that follows that bothers me. Not that it's uncommon but it should matter to people.

I always recall a semi final in the early 90s. Eagles v Glenelg. The was a group of Glenelg supporters on the eastern flank , some with those twirling, spinning noisy clappers (don't know what they are called). I don't believe they were really annoying anyone, but the redcoats confiscated them. Always thought it was poor. Soccer has it all over AFL in the supporter involvement side of it.

Dogwatcher wrote:

MW wrote: Why do you continue to believe alternative truths dogwatcher?
You need to separate hatred from facts and truths. Don't let it get you down to the point you don't know what you should believe anymore.

"Open your eyes and ears", as long as it's an AFC-sanctioned truth. Very Orwellian.
The fact is, a WAFC official posted this originally, why would he lie about something that would so easily be disproved? It's his credibility on the line.
The fact is, he deleted the post - if he did so because it was factually incorrect, I'd imagine an apology would have been made by WAFC. No apology or correction of the facts has been supplied by the WAFC or the official.
There's a truth in there somewhere, whether you like it or not.

There is two facts. You are getting the hang of this. The rest is opinion.
You will work it out one day.

MW wrote:

Dogwatcher wrote:

MW wrote: Why do you continue to believe alternative truths dogwatcher?
You need to separate hatred from facts and truths. Don't let it get you down to the point you don't know what you should believe anymore.

"Open your eyes and ears", as long as it's an AFC-sanctioned truth. Very Orwellian.
The fact is, a WAFC official posted this originally, why would he lie about something that would so easily be disproved? It's his credibility on the line.
The fact is, he deleted the post - if he did so because it was factually incorrect, I'd imagine an apology would have been made by WAFC. No apology or correction of the facts has been supplied by the WAFC or the official.
There's a truth in there somewhere, whether you like it or not.

There is two facts. You are getting the hang of this. The rest is opinion.
You will work it out one day.

Well, you've clearly got the facts of this sorted - there is only the AFC truth. I'm willing to hear from both sides. But thanks for lecturing us about closed minds.

I'm done with #Fencegate. For me, it's time to move on.

It has been confirmed that the Crows official was a sub contracted security guard. This was confirmed from both sides. Do we need a statement from the security company as well? Does the security guard need to hold a press conference?

Wasn't the security guard acting on behalf of the Adelaide official, as per WF's post below, and the account of other WAFC people?

westiesforever wrote:We were approached by the ground security supervisor and advised that they had received a complaint from an 'Adelaide Crows Official' about us banging on the fence excessively .

JK wrote:Wasn't the security guard acting on behalf of the Adelaide official, as per WF's post below, and the account of other WAFC people?

westiesforever wrote:We were approached by the ground security supervisor and advised that they had received a complaint from an 'Adelaide Crows Official' about us banging on the fence excessively .

The 'official' was a security guard contracted by Adelaide. Not sure how many times that needs to be said.

westiesforever wrote:Cheers Magellan , we sure do plan to keep our loud work up its great fun especially now the Bloods have strung a few wins together . I can confirm that a few pop rivets came away from some signage on the fence Saturday ... haha oops

Well it has to be asked ... what's on the signage? I can see a sponsorship deal for the WAFC cheer squad...

Dogwatcher wrote:Well, you've clearly got the facts of this sorted - there is only the AFC truth. I'm willing to hear from both sides. But thanks for lecturing us about closed minds.

I'm done with #Fencegate. For me, it's time to move on.

No way DW, don't let the truth die. Get onto Bernstein and Woodward pronto, Deep Throat must know something.

Yeah DW never believe Fake News! The Crows side is always the right side, it's not like they have history in this sort of thing!

Pseudo wrote:

westiesforever wrote:Cheers Magellan , we sure do plan to keep our loud work up its great fun especially now the Bloods have strung a few wins together . I can confirm that a few pop rivets came away from some signage on the fence Saturday ... haha oops

Well it has to be asked ... what's on the signage? I can see a sponsorship deal for the WAFC cheer squad...

Bang Brothers should get involved!

Pseudo wrote:

westiesforever wrote:Cheers Magellan , we sure do plan to keep our loud work up its great fun especially now the Bloods have strung a few wins together . I can confirm that a few pop rivets came away from some signage on the fence Saturday ... haha oops

Well it has to be asked ... what's on the signage? I can see a sponsorship deal for the WAFC cheer squad...

It's City Mazda signage , so maybe a panel beater sponsor for us ? Haha !

MW wrote:

JK wrote:Wasn't the security guard acting on behalf of the Adelaide official, as per WF's post below, and the account of other WAFC people?

westiesforever wrote:We were approached by the ground security supervisor and advised that they had received a complaint from an 'Adelaide Crows Official' about us banging on the fence excessively .

The 'official' was a security guard contracted by Adelaide. Not sure how many times that needs to be said.

I see

Given the who ha over a contractor of the Adelaide Football Club embarrassing himself and his employer can't wait for the shit storm to be caused at Noarlunga when they demand a coaches box be provided to them on centre wing instead of being in the pocket like most other clubs have done for over 20 years

heater31 wrote:Given the who ha over a contractor of the Adelaide Football Club embarrassing himself and his employer can't wait for the shit storm to be caused at Noarlunga when they demand a coaches box be provided to them on centre wing instead of being in the pocket like most other clubs have done for over 20 years

All car horns to be disconnected upon entry

#fakenews
#fencegate

Keep it down you lot.

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk

heater31 wrote:Given the who ha over a contractor of the Adelaide Football Club embarrassing himself and his employer can't wait for the shit storm to be caused at Noarlunga when they demand a coaches box be provided to them on centre wing instead of being in the pocket like most other clubs have done for over 20 years

got a feeling thats already happened