by dedja » Wed Apr 10, 2013 5:52 pm
by therisingblues » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:22 pm
by dedja » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:24 pm
by therisingblues » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:29 pm
dedja wrote:There's 9 delegates ... 8 SANFL clubs (Port Magpies lost their seat when they became One Club) and Rob Kerin as the Country delegate.
by kickinit » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:53 pm
whufc wrote:How many North Adelaide games have u seen in the last two years to know where Young sits in the Roosters squad.
by on the rails » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:56 pm
by on the rails » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:59 pm
Booney wrote:on the rails wrote:Middle of the Road - when?
For about 20 years. Like it or not. Never top, never bottom. Middle of the road.
I for one quite like it that way.
by whufc » Wed Apr 10, 2013 7:26 pm
kickinit wrote:whufc wrote:How many North Adelaide games have u seen in the last two years to know where Young sits in the Roosters squad.
none but saw him play for the power last year and if he is able to play like that at the elite level of the afl then he clearly would be able to play a high level in the sanfl.
by Pseudo » Wed Apr 10, 2013 7:36 pm
Asgardian wrote:The Port Adelaide (AFL) players are paid by Port Adelaide (AFL).
Hence they (we) should have the right to dictate where our players play.
by Pseudo » Wed Apr 10, 2013 7:40 pm
Asgardian wrote:Ian wrote:Asgardian wrote:The Port Adelaide (AFL) players are paid by Port Adelaide (AFL).
Hence they (we) should have the right to dictate where our players play.
With some future good sense all Port Adelaide players will be based at Alberton
The crow players should also be based in a single club/arm of the crows.
It's good to see you don't mind selling out over 100 years of tradition to support your AFL disaster
Port Adelaide joined the AFL competition in 1997, that is my priority. The Port Adelaide Magpies should always have been our seconds team.
The SANFL stuffed things up in 1990 (& before that) & in 1996.
Port's history is where our main team is based.
Port's history say in 1950 is based on our league team, not our reserves. Port's history in 2013 is based on our AFL team, not our soon to be seconds team.
Just because teams like the Roosters are in a competition that is growing more irrelevant by the day, don't take it out on the most successful club in SA footy.
by kickinit » Wed Apr 10, 2013 7:43 pm
whufc wrote:kickinit wrote:whufc wrote:How many North Adelaide games have u seen in the last two years to know where Young sits in the Roosters squad.
none but saw him play for the power last year and if he is able to play like that at the elite level of the afl then he clearly would be able to play a high level in the sanfl.
None thought so!
Playing for Powers side last year wasn't an achievement to brag about
Even James Sellar has had a couple of ok AFL games doesn't mean his clearly in the best of any SANFL sides
by whufc » Wed Apr 10, 2013 7:45 pm
by whufc » Wed Apr 10, 2013 7:48 pm
kickinit wrote:whufc wrote:kickinit wrote:whufc wrote:How many North Adelaide games have u seen in the last two years to know where Young sits in the Roosters squad.
none but saw him play for the power last year and if he is able to play like that at the elite level of the afl then he clearly would be able to play a high level in the sanfl.
None thought so!
Playing for Powers side last year wasn't an achievement to brag about
Even James Sellar has had a couple of ok AFL games doesn't mean his clearly in the best of any SANFL sides
but when you play against quality opposition and go pretty good then that means you are capable of playing at the elite level. then when you do go back to the second rate comp and grab and get in the best players then I think it's safe to say you are worthy of playing in the league side. If there was a specific reason why north didn't play him in the league side then north would of come out said so. and as at the moment they haven't given a reason to why he wasn't selected in the league side i'm sure it's safe to say they did because they disrupt their league side by a player thats probably going to be coming and going all season.
by therisingblues » Wed Apr 10, 2013 11:23 pm
by SimonH » Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:33 am
by kickinit » Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:41 am
whufc wrote:LOL ummm doesnt the non selection give you the answer. THEY DIDNT BELIEVE HE WAS IN THEIR BEST 21 TO BEAT THE CENTRALS SIDE WHICH THEY THOUGHT THEY WOULD BE UP AGAINST.
And what you expect North to come out publicly and tell Port fans why he wasnt selected. Here's a tip i bet you the North board dont give a 5hite about the Port fans and their concerns. Any discussion they would have had on this matter would have been to the Power coaches in private.
by kickinit » Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:42 am
SimonH wrote:I just love the irony of the whole situation.
The Pahhhhhr are so outraged by the fact that a player that they didn't pick last weekend, didn't get to play SANFL league... that they're aggressively pursuing a policy that will likely have the effect that none of their players who they don't pick on any given weekend, will get to play SANFL league.
Serious question: does anyone foresee a scenario where the Port Adelaide Magpies still are a part of the SANFL league competition from 2015 on? How would that work?
by JK » Thu Apr 11, 2013 1:00 am
kickinit wrote:whufc wrote:LOL ummm doesnt the non selection give you the answer. THEY DIDNT BELIEVE HE WAS IN THEIR BEST 21 TO BEAT THE CENTRALS SIDE WHICH THEY THOUGHT THEY WOULD BE UP AGAINST.
And what you expect North to come out publicly and tell Port fans why he wasnt selected. Here's a tip i bet you the North board dont give a 5hite about the Port fans and their concerns. Any discussion they would have had on this matter would have been to the Power coaches in private.
we all know he was in their best 21, so stop trying act as if he wasn't. If they had a good enough reason why he wasn't they would of said so, to save them looking like idiots for not picking him.
by JK » Thu Apr 11, 2013 1:07 am
by RustyCage » Thu Apr 11, 2013 1:31 am
JK wrote:kickinit wrote:whufc wrote:LOL ummm doesnt the non selection give you the answer. THEY DIDNT BELIEVE HE WAS IN THEIR BEST 21 TO BEAT THE CENTRALS SIDE WHICH THEY THOUGHT THEY WOULD BE UP AGAINST.
And what you expect North to come out publicly and tell Port fans why he wasnt selected. Here's a tip i bet you the North board dont give a 5hite about the Port fans and their concerns. Any discussion they would have had on this matter would have been to the Power coaches in private.
we all know he was in their best 21, so stop trying act as if he wasn't. If they had a good enough reason why he wasn't they would of said so, to save them looking like idiots for not picking him.
To be fair there's not much difference between North Adelaide's best 21 and the Power's best 21
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |