stampy wrote:saintal wrote:improve- south, norwood
backward- glenelg, north, port
obviously you dont read the ins and outs mate
When was the last time ins and outs actually won a game
by oldblueeyes » Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:17 pm
stampy wrote:saintal wrote:improve- south, norwood
backward- glenelg, north, port
obviously you dont read the ins and outs mate
by bayman » Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:24 pm
oldblueeyes wrote:stampy wrote:saintal wrote:improve- south, norwood
backward- glenelg, north, port
obviously you dont read the ins and outs mate
When was the last time ins and outs actually won a game
by saintal » Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:24 am
stampy wrote:saintal wrote:improve- south, norwood
backward- glenelg, north, port
obviously you dont read the ins and outs mate
by eaglehaslanded » Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:09 am
Wedgie wrote:eaglehaslanded wrote:Wedgie wrote:I reckon the Eagles will go backwards and it wouldn't surprise me if North do too especially if injury hits the wrong sort of player where we have no depth.
For eg if O'Hara goes down we'll be trusting 1 or 2 ruckmen who haven't played league footy regularly if at all.
You only hope the Eagles go backwards wedgie. I'm predicting we play another prelim at least.
Don't hope that at all mate, I'd be quite happy beating them twice in the finals every year.
Assessment made purely from their ins and outs.
by Whitelinefever » Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:58 pm
by Mr66 » Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:46 pm
by stampy » Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:48 pm
saintal wrote:stampy wrote:saintal wrote:improve- south, norwood
backward- glenelg, north, port
obviously you dont read the ins and outs mate
Yeah I read them. You cant make your predictions based purely on that list though.
by LBT » Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:48 pm
stampy wrote:saintal wrote:stampy wrote:saintal wrote:improve- south, norwood
backward- glenelg, north, port
obviously you dont read the ins and outs mate
Yeah I read them. You cant make your predictions based purely on that list though.
what are you basing your predictions on then? i am curious
by Mr Irate » Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:48 am
oldblueeyes wrote:stampy wrote:saintal wrote:improve- south, norwood
backward- glenelg, north, port
obviously you dont read the ins and outs mate
When was the last time ins and outs actually won a game
by SDK » Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:28 pm
by whufc » Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:23 pm
SDK wrote:Centrals can not improve so they wont.
North I think the window of opportunity has gone and retirements suggest
they will slide.
Eagles look to have lost much more than they have gained so they too will slide Lindsay is irreplaceable.
Glenelg I think will be somewhere near the same if not better
Sturt played above themselves all year and will slide out of the finals
Port on paper are in for a bad year and I predict will just finish just off the bottom.
Norwood are the big improvers they will threaten the flag this year with the recruits they have gained and minimal losses.
West will certainly improve and will make the finals.
South sorry boys you get the spoon.
Prediction at end of minor round....
Centrals
Glenelg
Norwood
North
West
Eagles
Sturt
Port
South
by bulldogproud » Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:04 pm
by Pseudo » Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:41 pm
whufc wrote:[...]Losing Bailey is a huge loss as well, he may not be the most highly skilled player in the team but he was one of very very very few in the Norwood side who could win the ball 30 times a game.
by topsywaldron » Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:12 pm
whufc wrote:What recruits have Norwood really picked up which are going to make an immediate impact?
whufc wrote:Losing Bailey is a huge loss as well, he may not be the most highly skilled player in the team but he was one of very very very few in the Norwood side who could win the ball 30 times a game.
by whufc » Sun Jan 13, 2008 6:17 pm
topsywaldron wrote:whufc wrote:What recruits have Norwood really picked up which are going to make an immediate impact?
We've picked up three who I'd expect to make a big difference immediately, Doyle, Phillips and Trotter. That's based on the simple fact that they've been considered good enough to play AFL within the last two years. Apart from that there's another five or six players new to Norwood who you could reasonably hope that we'd get quality games out of half of them. Most importantly we've recruited to fix deficiencies, in the on ball department. We were killed in the rotations last year and the adition of four or five pacey on ballers, with a decent ruckman to deliver it to them, can only help.whufc wrote:Losing Bailey is a huge loss as well, he may not be the most highly skilled player in the team but he was one of very very very few in the Norwood side who could win the ball 30 times a game.
He might have got it thirty times but his opponent usually got it thirty five times and they'd generally use it better as well.
by Wedgie » Sun Jan 13, 2008 6:19 pm
whufc wrote:Being on an AFL list hasn't automatically meant the player would succedd at SANFL level just ask South Adelaide quite the opposite actually.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by nickname » Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:08 pm
by topsywaldron » Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:27 pm
whufc wrote:Being on an AFL list hasn't automatically meant the player would succedd at SANFL level ... quite the opposite actually.
by topsywaldron » Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:29 pm
nickname wrote: I think Norwood's outs outweigh their ins
by fester69 » Sun Jan 13, 2008 8:08 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |