by CK » Tue Aug 29, 2006 8:18 pm
by Punk Rooster » Tue Aug 29, 2006 8:46 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Dutchy » Tue Aug 29, 2006 10:50 pm
by GWW » Tue Aug 29, 2006 11:14 pm
by Dissident » Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:31 am
by westside » Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:50 am
by Bullitt » Wed Aug 30, 2006 11:12 am
by heater31 » Wed Aug 30, 2006 2:28 pm
wide receiver wrote:I'm struggling to see how Sydney could field a full reserves side. A full AFL squad can bearly field 2 sides, and that's before factoring in injuries experienced over the course of a season.
Perhaps he meant the swans players can be distributed to SANFL clubs much like the Cows and Paaaa do now. If that's the case, i'd strongly oppose it. You can't expect a dropped AFL player to put in a 100% effort for a team he hasn't heard of in a second tier competition in another state.
by Squawk » Wed Aug 30, 2006 8:08 pm
Bullitt wrote:Sorry if I have missed this point in another reply, if the Sydney Swans reserves are playing in the SANFL who would that SANFL reserves side play against.
Plus the U/19 and U/17.
Would they just have a bye.
by MagicKiwi » Thu Aug 31, 2006 2:32 pm
by Punk Rooster » Thu Aug 31, 2006 4:20 pm
MagicKiwi wrote:I'm a yes. Something new, different, worth a try.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by rd » Thu Aug 31, 2006 4:54 pm
by heater31 » Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:44 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:MagicKiwi wrote:I'm a yes. Something new, different, worth a try.
Maybe the All-Blacks could enter a side*
by Strawb » Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:36 pm
by sydney-dog » Thu Aug 31, 2006 9:24 pm
by SimonH » Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:59 am
A fair while ago, but the most recent comparison between the two competitions certainly doesn't suggest that a team that dominates the ACTAFL would be uncompetitive in the SANFL:sydney-dog wrote:syd ressie's side would get smashed
it is disrespectful to our comp to even mention that they are a chance of being competitive
by JK » Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:00 pm
SimonH wrote:A fair while ago, but the most recent comparison between the two competitions certainly doesn't suggest that a team that dominates the ACTAFL would be uncompetitive in the SANFL:sydney-dog wrote:syd ressie's side would get smashed
it is disrespectful to our comp to even mention that they are a chance of being competitive
1997 Inter-league Canberra SA 13 17 95 ACT 8 5 53
The standard of SANFL may well have improved since 1997, but not by a margin of 15 or 20 goals.
by MagicKiwi » Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:18 pm
heater31 wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:MagicKiwi wrote:I'm a yes. Something new, different, worth a try.
Maybe the All-Blacks could enter a side*
They already send a team to the Australian Country Championships don't they????
South Australia didn't send one this year because the SANFL are tight ar*es
by sydney-dog » Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:20 pm
by SimonH » Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:52 pm
Last week, for example, the Swans reserves were comprised of 100% Sydney Swans players. Team list here. If you go back through the team list for the year you'll find that pretty much without exception they have played either 100% Swans or only one or two SFL top-up players. See my original long post for the reason why.sydney-dog wrote:SimonH
I see a fair bit of ACT and SFL footy, the swans ressies top up players each week from local SFL clubs, these players are usually local kids 18-20 yrs of age which they are looking at for the rookie list, trust me, they will get smashed in the sanfl
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |