SA Footy

therisingblues wrote:So what was on the news last night that was clearly unrelated to Nick Murphy?

A SANFL player has been charged with Sexual Assault. Nick has nothing to do with this, as I'm told it involves another club who is already in turmoil..

Killa wrote:

therisingblues wrote:So what was on the news last night that was clearly unrelated to Nick Murphy?

A SANFL player has been charged with Sexual Assault. Nick has nothing to do with this, as I'm told it involves another club who is already in turmoil..

Now I understand why there was so much anger over earlier posts.
Hadn't seen/heard that story.

Dogwatcher wrote:

Killa wrote:

therisingblues wrote:So what was on the news last night that was clearly unrelated to Nick Murphy?

A SANFL player has been charged with Sexual Assault. Nick has nothing to do with this, as I'm told it involves another club who is already in turmoil..

Now I understand why there was so much anger over my earlier post.
Hadn't seen/heard that story.

Apparently it was on the news last night but nothing has been published as yet. I've been told by SANFL player there were heap of messages sent around in within their playing group and believe the alleged person is from their club.

Killa wrote:

Dogwatcher wrote:

Killa wrote:

therisingblues wrote:So what was on the news last night that was clearly unrelated to Nick Murphy?

A SANFL player has been charged with Sexual Assault. Nick has nothing to do with this, as I'm told it involves another club who is already in turmoil..

Now I understand why there was so much anger over my earlier post.
Hadn't seen/heard that story.

Apparently it was on the news last night but nothing has been published as yet. I've been told by SANFL player there were heap of messages sent around in within their playing group and believe the alleged person is from their club.

On Channel 7 it was a single news item read out by Jane Doyle and then during Soda's weekly segment with Dale Lewis not long after, he tacked on that Nick had been released by the SAFC. Plenty of people will now be putting 2 and 2 together.....

heater31 wrote:

Killa wrote:

Dogwatcher wrote:

Killa wrote:[quote="therisingblues"]So what was on the news last night that was clearly unrelated to Nick Murphy?

A SANFL player has been charged with Sexual Assault. Nick has nothing to do with this, as I'm told it involves another club who is already in turmoil..

Now I understand why there was so much anger over my earlier post.
Hadn't seen/heard that story.

Apparently it was on the news last night but nothing has been published as yet. I've been told by SANFL player there were heap of messages sent around in within their playing group and believe the alleged person is from their club.

On Channel 7 it was a single news item read out by Jane Doyle and then during Soda's weekly segment with Dale Lewis not long after, he tacked on that Nick had been released by the SAFC. Plenty of people will now be putting 2 and 2 together.....[/quote]
But in this case 2 + 2 = 5

I guess Wednesdays Court Listings may shed some light on the situation.

Sooo is it drugs, booze, porn sites, ppl smuggling, smacking women or other?

I missed he ch 7 news the other night

Do actually reckon the sanfl and players are aware of this website?

Coach Bombay wrote:Do actually reckon the sanfl and players are aware of this website?

Players definately yes

Coach Bombay wrote:Do actually reckon the sanfl and players are aware of this website?

lol, we've even had an AFL player posting regularly here!

And considering the SANFL hierachy were at the SANFL media awards when we got presented with our award and gave me a media pass for years when I took photograph for the sites I'd say they're aware.

Was sacked by the board, not the coaching staff. Most of the players weren't happy with this.

Coach Bombay wrote:Do actually reckon the sanfl and players are aware of this website?

Mate, the bloody Redbacks players are aware of this website in summer, reckon the SANFL blokes would be too...

Is it true that Murphy was also sacked from his position as a school teacher by the education dept?

Spargo wrote:Is it true that Murphy was also sacked from his position as a school teacher by the education dept?

Would have to be something very serious (e.g professional misconduct) for this to happen.

Wedgie wrote:

Coach Bombay wrote:Do actually reckon the sanfl and players are aware of this website?

lol, we've even had an AFL player posting regularly here!

And considering the SANFL hierachy were at the SANFL media awards when we got presented with our award and gave me a media pass for years when I took photograph for the sites I'd say they're aware.

He wasn't an AFL player then.

Spargo wrote:Is it true that Murphy was also sacked from his position as a school teacher by the education dept?

Well if you know its true post so ,otherwise your post is potentially very misleading and one to create unnecessary innuendo. You are now inferring kids . Most your posts are shallow but this one is quite dumb.

Bounce of the ball wrote:

Spargo wrote:Is it true that Murphy was also sacked from his position as a school teacher by the education dept?

Well if you know its true post so ,otherwise your post is potentially very misleading and one to create unnecessary innuendo. You are now inferring kids . Most your posts are shallow but this one is quite dumb.

He just asked a question you halfwit. If he knew, he'd have no doubt stated it, instead of inquiring about it. Murphy's job happens to be a teacher, I doubt Spargo's inference had anything to do with kids.
And you, whose contributions to this site are often no deeper than a Petrie dish, should hardly pass comment on another's depth of post.

Nothing proven, at this point, yeah?
Need to tread carefully

LPH wrote:Nothing proven, at this point, yeah?
Need to tread carefully

Well its proven that the SAFC have asked Nick to leave the club.

What is not proven is the reasons behind this decision and also weather his employment outside of Football has also been terminated.

Bounce of the ball wrote:

Spargo wrote:Is it true that Murphy was also sacked from his position as a school teacher by the education dept?

Well if you know its true post so ,otherwise your post is potentially very misleading and one to create unnecessary innuendo. You are now inferring kids . Most your posts are shallow but this one is quite dumb.

Simply asking a question & inferring nothing whatsoever, you might want to be careful - it's like having my own little stalker with you, Bouncey.
His termination (if correct) from the Ed Dept may actually be a result of his misdemeanours at South and nothing at all to do with wrong doing as a teacher. This would effectively rule out ANYTHING to do with kids.
But keep jumping to conclusions.