Cupido wanted more money....go figure

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:42 pm

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:heard CUPIDOLL on DUMB and DUMBER earlier and its interesting that SOUTH wont come out and say anything about it apart from the press release?

great management at NOARLUNGA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



I don't think South needs to say any more than they have. It's their concern and South don't have to tell other clubs' members anything.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:44 pm

have they told their own members anything?
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60953
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13438 times
Been liked: 4643 times

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:47 pm

I don't know, I'm not a South member.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby blueandwhite » Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:48 pm

tigger '79 , I am curious as to why the inner workings of your clubs' greatest rival are of so much interest to you.
That is unless you are keen to pick up Cupido or some more of our broken down handmedowns.
Tiocfaidh ár Lá
User avatar
blueandwhite
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1658
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Cloney Harp
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 219 times
Grassroots Team: Jamestown-Peterborough

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:53 pm

well i have several mates that play down at the club and now i understand why they are on the contracts they are.

what SOUTH have done could be a dangerous precendent and any player could get screwed in similar circumstances at any club.
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60953
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13438 times
Been liked: 4643 times

Postby GWW » Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:11 pm

blueandwhite wrote:tigger '79 , I am curious as to why the inner workings of your clubs' greatest rival are of so much interest to you.
That is unless you are keen to pick up Cupido or some more of our broken down handmedowns.


South bigger rivals with the Bays than what Port and North are? :?: :?:

Maybe geographically, but on field i wouldn't have thought so??
User avatar
GWW
Moderator
 
Posts: 15681
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Eastern suburbs of Adelaide
Has liked: 817 times
Been liked: 168 times

Postby am Bays » Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:25 pm

blueandwhite wrote:tigger '79 , I am curious as to why the inner workings of your clubs' greatest rival are of so much interest to you.
That is unless you are keen to pick up Cupido or some more of our broken down handmedowns.


Don't kid yourself B&W you might think we're your greatest rival and maybe to South we are given that in 85 years you've never beaten us in a final, have won less flags than us, so to you beating us may be a big deal.....

The only thing you've got more of than us in 86 years is spoons

We'll benchmark ourselves against the Ports and Norths of this world and in a modern day sense Centrals and the Eagles....

Beating South is common place for us, beating Port is a bit more special.....
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19741
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2124 times

Postby BPBRB » Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:55 pm

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:
blueandwhite wrote:tigger '79 , I am curious as to why the inner workings of your clubs' greatest rival are of so much interest to you.
That is unless you are keen to pick up Cupido or some more of our broken down handmedowns.


Don't kid yourself B&W you might think we're your greatest rival and maybe to South we are given that in 85 years you've never beaten us in a final, have won less flags than us, so to you beating us may be a big deal.....

The only thing you've got more of than us in 86 years is spoons

We'll benchmark ourselves against the Ports and Norths of this world and in a modern day sense Centrals and the Eagles....

Beating South is common place for us, beating Port is a bit more special.....


Great comeback tassie! This should be a good tit for tat distraction. Bring it on B&W your turn! :lol: :lol: :lol:
BPBRB
 

Postby RM » Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:14 pm

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:
blueandwhite wrote:tigger '79 , I am curious as to why the inner workings of your clubs' greatest rival are of so much interest to you.
That is unless you are keen to pick up Cupido or some more of our broken down handmedowns.


Don't kid yourself B&W you might think we're your greatest rival and maybe to South we are given that in 85 years you've never beaten us in a final, have won less flags than us, so to you beating us may be a big deal.....

The only thing you've got more of than us in 86 years is spoons

We'll benchmark ourselves against the Ports and Norths of this world and in a modern day sense Centrals and the Eagles....

Beating South is common place for us, beating Port is a bit more special.....


Great post Tassie
RM
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 301
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:13 pm
Location: Near Grand North, The Northern Tavern and Prospect Oval. All belong to the Mighty NAFC.
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 5 times
Grassroots Team: Lincoln South

Postby ORDoubleBlues » Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:23 pm

blueandwhite wrote:As a gifted and talented player with AFL experience I'm sure that the club and the supporters expected a great deal more from him in 2006 than what he offered. Stats gurus will point to the fact that he kicked 50+ goals for the year. The problem is that he probably kicked 30 of those goals against Sturt and West who with the greatest respect ,provided only moderate opposition ,especially when he booted 11 against Sturt.


Will agree with you on that one Blueandwhite. If he'd been even more selfish that day against Sturt, he could have ended up kicking 18.
Looked in his best knick fitnesswise way back in January when I played cricket against him.
User avatar
ORDoubleBlues
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:36 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Wisanger

Postby blueandwhite » Thu Nov 16, 2006 8:10 am

Yeah HISTORY is a wonderful thing,warm and fuzzy etc etc.You dont have to be a rocket scientist to figure that any club has won more flags than us in the last 100 yrs. Blah blah. That ol' chestnut gets rolled out, along with "THE SALARY CAP" whenever South is mentioned.
Back to the point of my post.
Why is it so vitally important to you to have knowledge of the inside workings of a rival club?
Personally I couldnt give a f-----g f--- what goes on in the much celebrate,hallowed, cloistered,inner sanctom, at Glenelg, ever.

By the way, Whats the definition of confusion?

A fathers'& sons picnic at the Glenelg Past players. :D
Tiocfaidh ár Lá
User avatar
blueandwhite
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1658
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Cloney Harp
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 219 times
Grassroots Team: Jamestown-Peterborough

Postby am Bays » Thu Nov 16, 2006 8:57 am

Gee Blue and White first sign of a person losing an arguement is when they have to attack the individual/organisation rather than the issue

If I wanted to get down to your level I could state the definition of unemployed, A South Adelaide Football Club trophy cabinet maker :lol: :lol: but I won't so I'll withdraw that remark

FYI History is the study of tomorrow as someone once told me as it is funny how history repeats itself....The claims kerley made about you club in the 60s still hold true today....

Maybe to get around the cap, South could pay their players in peppercorns :wink:

Just to help your comprehension skills: MT 79 is interested in his mates not the South club per se, me I'm interested in the SANFL "confidentiality" agreements the fact that South is invovled in both of those issues is to a degree coincidental but at the same time rather interesting......
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19741
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2124 times

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Thu Nov 16, 2006 10:34 am

SOUTH SALARY CAP MELBOURNE PANDERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60953
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13438 times
Been liked: 4643 times

Postby Gravel » Thu Nov 16, 2006 2:36 pm

1980 - Haven't South and Glenelg only ever played 1 final in those 85 years ?
Gravel
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 231
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 8:16 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 8 times

Postby am Bays » Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:12 pm

Off the top of my head, yes, I can only recall four times when we have both been in the final series, 64, 77, 90 and 92

IIRC correctly we had a close game in 84 just before the finals which we won to keep them out of them at Adelaide oval

81 rings a bell too I think but we didn't play in the elimination final...

Bottom line our # of flags, GFs, finals appearances and spoons are both in the +ves towards us.

We look towards your lot and others before we look to South vis-a-vis important games in a season
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19741
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2124 times

Salary Cap (South Adelaide)

Postby dash61 » Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:22 pm

Salary Cap (South Adelaide)

We all question the CAP, but apart from Prendegast, Bennett, Parry who would be the big salary earners down there, Kenna would be after more now, Archard come over as an unknown but really who are the big money earners down there now that Cupido has been minced. i think if we are going down that wrong path as there a few clubs with bigger pay roles
dash61
 

Postby JK » Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:35 pm

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Off the top of my head, yes, I can only recall four times when we have both been in the final series, 64, 77, 90 and 92

IIRC correctly we had a close game in 84 just before the finals which we won to keep them out of them at Adelaide oval

81 rings a bell too I think but we didn't play in the elimination final...

Bottom line our # of flags, GFs, finals appearances and spoons are both in the +ves towards us.

We look towards your lot and others before we look to South vis-a-vis important games in a season


South made the finals in 84 aswell mate ... I remember the game at Adelaide ur referring to, was a cracker like many others that year
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Postby Punk Rooster » Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:40 pm

Didn't South belt Glenelg & crush their finals "dream" just recently?
I'd say the Bay's are South's BITCHES!
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Postby Wedgie » Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:42 pm

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Bottom line our # of flags, GFs, finals appearances and spoons are both in the +ves towards us.


I might be mistaken but I thought South had won 11 premierships and Glenelg had only won 4?

IMHO the Bays aren't a pimple on South's backside as far as history goes and if you dont want to look at history then South were still in front of the Bays in 2006.
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby Aerie » Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:55 pm

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:We'll benchmark ourselves against the Ports and Norths of this world and in a modern day sense Centrals and the Eagles....


So Glenelg and the Beaconsfield miners do have something in common...
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5748
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:05 am
Has liked: 186 times
Been liked: 590 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |