by JamesH » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:18 am
by Dutchy » Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:17 am
JamesH wrote:is there a reason why all but 1 AFL club is involved in a joint venture in the VFL if they wanted reserve grade teams.
VFL rules state that each Vic based AFL club can field a reserves team (Geelong the only one)
by johntheclaret » Fri Mar 09, 2007 9:37 am
by Hondo » Fri Mar 09, 2007 11:05 am
by Aerie » Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:12 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:48 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:The AFL have said a national reserves competition is on the very bottom of their list of priorities and won't be happening any time soon, if ever. No need for concern.
by Barto » Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:26 pm
by giffo » Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:28 pm
I would rather die then see Westhoff, Symes, etc; in a bloody swampy jumper and as born & bred Northerners, they probably feel the same.pafc1870 wrote:Magpiespower wrote:Could we one day see a merged Port/Crows side as the tenth team in the SANFL?
Bloody hope not!!
Bring in a Crows reserves team and have all the Power players go to the Magpies
by westside » Fri Mar 09, 2007 9:49 pm
Barto wrote:Stand down the bombers and the missiles. Return to Defcon 5.
http://www.afl.com.au/Season2007/News/N ... wsId=38869
by Psyber » Sat Mar 10, 2007 4:50 pm
pafc1870 wrote:Magpiespower wrote:Could we one day see a merged Port/Crows side as the tenth team in the SANFL?
Bloody hope not!!
Bring in a Crows reserves team and have all the Power players go to the Magpies
by Barto » Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:16 pm
Psyber wrote:pafc1870 wrote:Magpiespower wrote:Could we one day see a merged Port/Crows side as the tenth team in the SANFL?
Bloody hope not!!
Bring in a Crows reserves team and have all the Power players go to the Magpies
Yeh .. but only if all the former SANFL players on PPs list go back to their SANFL clubs first and PP only have former Magpies and interstate recruits.
Personally, I think Port should have been allowed to join the VFL, then been thrown out of the SANFL and the territory redistributed, and the SANFL player retention scheme maintained..
by Psyber » Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:18 pm
Barto wrote:That was my preferred option at the time and it would have left us with an 8 team comp. Would have been interesting had Port been forced to totally go it alone without the benefit of having access to Footy Park. Do you think Port would have struggled on their own or would the SANFL have struggled without the financial input of the Camries?
by redandblack » Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:31 pm
Psyber wrote:Barto wrote:That was my preferred option at the time and it would have left us with an 8 team comp. Would have been interesting had Port been forced to totally go it alone without the benefit of having access to Footy Park. Do you think Port would have struggled on their own or would the SANFL have struggled without the financial input of the Camries?
I suspect that the player retention team would have held up the quality, after all it helped keep players like Gary McIntosh and Michael Aish at Norwood, and without the rivalry of the Power and Crows playing in SA the gate money would have held up too. I think Port would have struggled on their own with no supporters but their home-grown ones. I'd have had the SANFL move a team locals could relate to into Alberton Oval - perhaps West Adelaide as "Westport" to really make them squirm, as that team could have stolen some of the supporter base too by keeping the prison bar uniform with just a dash of red, and perhaps the Magpie logo with a red addition.
Ultimately, I think a national competition would have developed, but perhaps a more balanced one, not a rebadged VFL.
by Coorong » Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:37 pm
redandblack wrote:Psyber wrote:Barto wrote:That was my preferred option at the time and it would have left us with an 8 team comp. Would have been interesting had Port been forced to totally go it alone without the benefit of having access to Footy Park. Do you think Port would have struggled on their own or would the SANFL have struggled without the financial input of the Camries?
I suspect that the player retention team would have held up the quality, after all it helped keep players like Gary McIntosh and Michael Aish at Norwood, and without the rivalry of the Power and Crows playing in SA the gate money would have held up too. I think Port would have struggled on their own with no supporters but their home-grown ones. I'd have had the SANFL move a team locals could relate to into Alberton Oval - perhaps West Adelaide as "Westport" to really make them squirm, as that team could have stolen some of the supporter base too by keeping the prison bar uniform with just a dash of red, and perhaps the Magpie logo with a red addition.
Ultimately, I think a national competition would have developed, but perhaps a more balanced one, not a rebadged VFL.
That is close to a declaration of war between us, Psyber.
by Hazydog » Sat Mar 10, 2007 7:31 pm
by Hazydog » Sat Mar 10, 2007 7:31 pm
by Pseudo » Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:40 pm
Psyber wrote: I'd have had the SANFL move a team locals could relate to into Alberton Oval - perhaps West Adelaide as "Westport" to really make them squirm, as that team could have stolen some of the supporter base too by keeping the prison bar uniform with just a dash of red, and perhaps the Magpie logo with a red addition.
by johntheclaret » Sat Mar 10, 2007 11:22 pm
Aerie wrote:Don't like that idea at all johntheclaret. Notice your location is the northern hemisphere. Probably works better up there. I think the current SANFL clubs do have something real to fight for.
by blues2002 » Sat Mar 10, 2007 11:53 pm
hondo71 wrote:You can't go to a relegation and demotion system that's just pie in the sky stuff. For that to work the state league clubs have to be operationally and financially ready to step in to the AFL with 3 months' notice. Television, sponsorship and player/official contractual relationships all rely on knowing where the club is going in the next 2-3 years without uncertaintly as to which league the club is playing in. You will also create "super teams" within the state leagues - those 3 to 4 teams with a realistic chance of promotion - remember Garville & Contax dominating the local comp in the NNL.
That will never, ever, ever happen ....
by johntheclaret » Sun Mar 11, 2007 12:04 am
hondo71 wrote:You can't go to a relegation and demotion system that's just pie in the sky stuff. For that to work the state league clubs have to be operationally and financially ready to step in to the AFL with 3 months' notice. Television, sponsorship and player/official contractual relationships all rely on knowing where the club is going in the next 2-3 years without uncertaintly as to which league the club is playing in. You will also create "super teams" within the state leagues - those 3 to 4 teams with a realistic chance of promotion - remember Garville & Contax dominating the local comp in the NNL.
That will never, ever, ever happen ....
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |