by Dogwatcher » Fri May 18, 2007 3:26 pm
by HeartBeatsTrue » Fri May 18, 2007 3:44 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:It'd be nice if Norwood could find some money to do up their home ground a bit.
It's getting quite dated.
by Dogwatcher » Fri May 18, 2007 3:51 pm
by BPBRB » Fri May 18, 2007 3:56 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:I think its terraces could certainly be tidied up.
Maybe a more formal standing area near the bars (might alleviate issues between drinkers).
Move the BBQ from in front of the grandstand - looks terrible and there's food services area behind anyway. Would make more room.
Walkways around the oval could be a little better and less cluttered. Something could also be down with the lighting tower on the eastern side (at ground level - it looks terrible with all of that barbed wire around it). An advertiser or club sponsor could get very good value out of that tower and it would be less of an eyesore.
Please don't think this is an attack on your club. I just think the ammenities for spectators in the outer could be a little better.
by Dogwatcher » Fri May 18, 2007 4:00 pm
by BPBRB » Fri May 18, 2007 4:01 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Hey BP, did you have something to say?
by HeartBeatsTrue » Fri May 18, 2007 4:18 pm
by Dogwatcher » Fri May 18, 2007 4:19 pm
BPBRB wrote: I agree with your points dw but there are other grounds that need improvements on various degrees. Prospect from my point of view does need lot's of improvement but all going well with negotiations with the Council it shouldn't be too far away that money gets spent and the facilities as far as spectators go will be improved signifanctly as well as a good old clean up and face lift.
Elizabeth is hardly a "jewel in the crown" as far as facilities go so I would be keen to hear your thoughts on what needs doing out there?
by doggies4eva » Fri May 18, 2007 5:13 pm
BPBRB wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:I think its terraces could certainly be tidied up.
Maybe a more formal standing area near the bars (might alleviate issues between drinkers).
Move the BBQ from in front of the grandstand - looks terrible and there's food services area behind anyway. Would make more room.
Walkways around the oval could be a little better and less cluttered. Something could also be down with the lighting tower on the eastern side (at ground level - it looks terrible with all of that barbed wire around it). An advertiser or club sponsor could get very good value out of that tower and it would be less of an eyesore.
Please don't think this is an attack on your club. I just think the ammenities for spectators in the outer could be a little better.
I agree with your points dw but there are other grounds that need improvements on various degrees. Prospect from my point of view does need lot's of improvement but all going well with negotiations with the Council it shouldn't be too far away that money gets spent and the facilities as far as spectators go will be improved signifanctly as well as a good old clean up and face lift.
Elizabeth is hardly a "jewel in the crown" as far as facilities go so I would be keen to hear your thoughts on what needs doing out there?
by BPBRB » Fri May 18, 2007 5:23 pm
doggies4eva wrote:BPBRB wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:I think its terraces could certainly be tidied up.
Maybe a more formal standing area near the bars (might alleviate issues between drinkers).
Move the BBQ from in front of the grandstand - looks terrible and there's food services area behind anyway. Would make more room.
Walkways around the oval could be a little better and less cluttered. Something could also be down with the lighting tower on the eastern side (at ground level - it looks terrible with all of that barbed wire around it). An advertiser or club sponsor could get very good value out of that tower and it would be less of an eyesore.
Please don't think this is an attack on your club. I just think the ammenities for spectators in the outer could be a little better.
I agree with your points dw but there are other grounds that need improvements on various degrees. Prospect from my point of view does need lot's of improvement but all going well with negotiations with the Council it shouldn't be too far away that money gets spent and the facilities as far as spectators go will be improved signifanctly as well as a good old clean up and face lift.
Elizabeth is hardly a "jewel in the crown" as far as facilities go so I would be keen to hear your thoughts on what needs doing out there?
The Council promised to build another grandstand when the club first made the finals. That was 1971 and we are still waiting.
by Dogwatcher » Fri May 18, 2007 5:27 pm
by Grahaml » Fri May 18, 2007 11:48 pm
SimonH wrote:Scott Burns?!Grahaml wrote: Any former Norwood players possibly in their last AFL season?
That said (and it's a safe bet we wouldn't say no to Burns), the way to get people through the gates is to be winning games, not to buy high-profile players. People went to the Parade en masse to see Tredrea because it was a one-off chance to see an AFL champ playing local footy. He wouldn't add 100 to the crowd week-in, week-out if he's playing full-time for PAMFC in 5 years' time, unless he could contribute to Port being on top of the ladder.
If Norwood has plenty of cash for recruiting in 2008, we want to pick up blokes who really perform on the park, rather than names. Blokes like Kieran McGuinness and... gulp... Ian Callinan.
Great news for the NFC and its future, if anything like the numbers being talked about, are true. Kudos to all of those involved.
by smac » Sat May 19, 2007 7:41 am
The club certainly hasn't been sitting back waiting on council to help though - they are doing stuff themselves to keep progressing toward the objective (world domination I believeBPBRB wrote:doggies4eva wrote:BPBRB wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:I think its terraces could certainly be tidied up.
Maybe a more formal standing area near the bars (might alleviate issues between drinkers).
Move the BBQ from in front of the grandstand - looks terrible and there's food services area behind anyway. Would make more room.
Walkways around the oval could be a little better and less cluttered. Something could also be down with the lighting tower on the eastern side (at ground level - it looks terrible with all of that barbed wire around it). An advertiser or club sponsor could get very good value out of that tower and it would be less of an eyesore.
Please don't think this is an attack on your club. I just think the ammenities for spectators in the outer could be a little better.
I agree with your points dw but there are other grounds that need improvements on various degrees. Prospect from my point of view does need lot's of improvement but all going well with negotiations with the Council it shouldn't be too far away that money gets spent and the facilities as far as spectators go will be improved signifanctly as well as a good old clean up and face lift.
Elizabeth is hardly a "jewel in the crown" as far as facilities go so I would be keen to hear your thoughts on what needs doing out there?
The Council promised to build another grandstand when the club first made the finals. That was 1971 and we are still waiting.
I think you hit the nail on the head as most clubs have council issues etc to get around and I know North are reluctant to pour money into what is essentially someone else's asset. If we other clubs could just have the 99 year @ 1 dollar deal South got but not every club has the Premier as a Supporter.
If North were smarter then they could have done a deal with Bannon when he was premier years ago - a bit more "lost money" in the State Bank fiasco would not have been noticed!
by Squawk » Sun May 20, 2007 1:56 am
by BPBRB » Sun May 20, 2007 4:34 pm
Squawk wrote:A few points:
Norwood u/17s have trained at Golden Grove for 3 or so years now - so work is going in to that area.
The new pokies venue at Gilles Plains is a commercial venture rather than a "Norwood Football Club" expansion away from the Parade.
HBT and SMAC have correctly pointed out a number of improvements that have occurred recently. Also, aluminium bleachers from footy park are being installed at the Northern end at the moment.
The eastern light tower does have sponsorship signs - BigStar for one.
As for the shithouses, they could certainly be improved but seriously Centurion, if you go to the footy and need a Thomas Crapper you need to stop having baked beans for breaky on a Saturday morning! Lets not forget the ladies needs tho...
All up I think our ground is pretty good in service terms with a lot of options for food/drink all the way around the ground. At other grounds these services are pretty much limited to the grandstand sides.
by SDK » Sun May 20, 2007 10:52 pm
by topsywaldron » Sun May 20, 2007 10:58 pm
SDK wrote:But the main reason this did not go ahead was the members stood up and said no !!!!
by mal » Thu May 24, 2007 10:53 pm
by JK » Fri May 25, 2007 12:50 pm
mal wrote:This might be right![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
NORWOOD COMMUNITY CLUB
PURCHASED FOR$900,000
SOLD FOR..........$5.4 MILLION
PROFIT...............$4.5 MILLION
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
by doggies4eva » Fri May 25, 2007 2:05 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |