Norwood Financial Update

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Postby Dogwatcher » Fri May 18, 2007 3:26 pm

It'd be nice if Norwood could find some money to do up their home ground a bit.
It's getting quite dated.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Postby HeartBeatsTrue » Fri May 18, 2007 3:44 pm

Dogwatcher wrote:It'd be nice if Norwood could find some money to do up their home ground a bit.
It's getting quite dated.


Dated? Explain please. Which other oval should Norwood aspire to?
HeartBeatsTrue
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1194
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:24 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 5 times
Grassroots Team: Pooraka

Postby Dogwatcher » Fri May 18, 2007 3:51 pm

I think its terraces could certainly be tidied up.
Maybe a more formal standing area near the bars (might alleviate issues between drinkers).
Move the BBQ from in front of the grandstand - looks terrible and there's food services area behind anyway. Would make more room.
Walkways around the oval could be a little better and less cluttered. Something could also be down with the lighting tower on the eastern side (at ground level - it looks terrible with all of that barbed wire around it). An advertiser or club sponsor could get very good value out of that tower and it would be less of an eyesore.

Please don't think this is an attack on your club. I just think the ammenities for spectators in the outer could be a little better.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Postby BPBRB » Fri May 18, 2007 3:56 pm

Dogwatcher wrote:I think its terraces could certainly be tidied up.
Maybe a more formal standing area near the bars (might alleviate issues between drinkers).
Move the BBQ from in front of the grandstand - looks terrible and there's food services area behind anyway. Would make more room.
Walkways around the oval could be a little better and less cluttered. Something could also be down with the lighting tower on the eastern side (at ground level - it looks terrible with all of that barbed wire around it). An advertiser or club sponsor could get very good value out of that tower and it would be less of an eyesore.

Please don't think this is an attack on your club. I just think the ammenities for spectators in the outer could be a little better.


I agree with your points dw but there are other grounds that need improvements on various degrees. Prospect from my point of view does need lot's of improvement but all going well with negotiations with the Council it shouldn't be too far away that money gets spent and the facilities as far as spectators go will be improved signifanctly as well as a good old clean up and face lift.

Elizabeth is hardly a "jewel in the crown" as far as facilities go so I would be keen to hear your thoughts on what needs doing out there?
Last edited by BPBRB on Fri May 18, 2007 4:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
BPBRB
 

Postby Dogwatcher » Fri May 18, 2007 4:00 pm

Hey BP, did you have something to say? ;)
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Postby BPBRB » Fri May 18, 2007 4:01 pm

Dogwatcher wrote:Hey BP, did you have something to say? ;)


sorry don't know what happened but have edited now what I wanted to post originally
BPBRB
 

Postby HeartBeatsTrue » Fri May 18, 2007 4:18 pm

Thanks dw, my point is that how is it any worse than club's ovals that have been rolling in cash for some time?
In the last 5 years or so Norwood has upgraded the coopers hill outlet, built the coopers corner facility, upgraded the northern entrance and upgraded the changerooms. Probably at none or little cost to the club but at least its progress.
As for amenities, the one in the outer is pretty bad but the other 3 toilets are ok.
HeartBeatsTrue
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1194
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:24 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 5 times
Grassroots Team: Pooraka

Postby Dogwatcher » Fri May 18, 2007 4:19 pm

BPBRB wrote: I agree with your points dw but there are other grounds that need improvements on various degrees. Prospect from my point of view does need lot's of improvement but all going well with negotiations with the Council it shouldn't be too far away that money gets spent and the facilities as far as spectators go will be improved signifanctly as well as a good old clean up and face lift.

Elizabeth is hardly a "jewel in the crown" as far as facilities go so I would be keen to hear your thoughts on what needs doing out there?


I haven't been to Prospect for ages. I can't really comment- except to say if nothing's been done since I was last there, then something probably should be by now.

To me Elizabeth could probably have its lights upgraded slightly - not as much as others would say though. Maybe for night games - lighting on the hills could be better (maybe remove some of that 'fear factor')
I think the terraces on the train track side could be cleared slightly - to allow a better walkway.
As far as I can say the high school side of the oval is pretty good. lots of space, wide terraces near the fence.
Apart from that I can't think of too much else - I reckon it's a pretty good venue to watch at, park your car and get to.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Postby doggies4eva » Fri May 18, 2007 5:13 pm

BPBRB wrote:
Dogwatcher wrote:I think its terraces could certainly be tidied up.
Maybe a more formal standing area near the bars (might alleviate issues between drinkers).
Move the BBQ from in front of the grandstand - looks terrible and there's food services area behind anyway. Would make more room.
Walkways around the oval could be a little better and less cluttered. Something could also be down with the lighting tower on the eastern side (at ground level - it looks terrible with all of that barbed wire around it). An advertiser or club sponsor could get very good value out of that tower and it would be less of an eyesore.

Please don't think this is an attack on your club. I just think the ammenities for spectators in the outer could be a little better.


I agree with your points dw but there are other grounds that need improvements on various degrees. Prospect from my point of view does need lot's of improvement but all going well with negotiations with the Council it shouldn't be too far away that money gets spent and the facilities as far as spectators go will be improved signifanctly as well as a good old clean up and face lift.

Elizabeth is hardly a "jewel in the crown" as far as facilities go so I would be keen to hear your thoughts on what needs doing out there?


The Council promised to build another grandstand when the club first made the finals. That was 1971 and we are still waiting.
We used to be good :-(
User avatar
doggies4eva
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: In front of a computer screen
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby BPBRB » Fri May 18, 2007 5:23 pm

doggies4eva wrote:
BPBRB wrote:
Dogwatcher wrote:I think its terraces could certainly be tidied up.
Maybe a more formal standing area near the bars (might alleviate issues between drinkers).
Move the BBQ from in front of the grandstand - looks terrible and there's food services area behind anyway. Would make more room.
Walkways around the oval could be a little better and less cluttered. Something could also be down with the lighting tower on the eastern side (at ground level - it looks terrible with all of that barbed wire around it). An advertiser or club sponsor could get very good value out of that tower and it would be less of an eyesore.

Please don't think this is an attack on your club. I just think the ammenities for spectators in the outer could be a little better.


I agree with your points dw but there are other grounds that need improvements on various degrees. Prospect from my point of view does need lot's of improvement but all going well with negotiations with the Council it shouldn't be too far away that money gets spent and the facilities as far as spectators go will be improved signifanctly as well as a good old clean up and face lift.

Elizabeth is hardly a "jewel in the crown" as far as facilities go so I would be keen to hear your thoughts on what needs doing out there?


The Council promised to build another grandstand when the club first made the finals. That was 1971 and we are still waiting.


I think you hit the nail on the head as most clubs have council issues etc to get around and I know North are reluctant to pour money into what is essentially someone else's asset. If we other clubs could just have the 99 year @ 1 dollar deal South got but not every club has the Premier as a Supporter :roll: .

If North were smarter then they could have done a deal with Bannon when he was premier years ago - a bit more "lost money" in the State Bank fiasco would not have been noticed!
BPBRB
 

Postby Dogwatcher » Fri May 18, 2007 5:27 pm

Hmmmm...Mr Rann's electorate is partly in our zone isn't it????

As for a new grandstand at Elizabeth, I don't think it's necessary.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Postby Grahaml » Fri May 18, 2007 11:48 pm

SimonH wrote:
Grahaml wrote: Any former Norwood players possibly in their last AFL season?
Scott Burns?!

That said (and it's a safe bet we wouldn't say no to Burns), the way to get people through the gates is to be winning games, not to buy high-profile players. People went to the Parade en masse to see Tredrea because it was a one-off chance to see an AFL champ playing local footy. He wouldn't add 100 to the crowd week-in, week-out if he's playing full-time for PAMFC in 5 years' time, unless he could contribute to Port being on top of the ladder.

If Norwood has plenty of cash for recruiting in 2008, we want to pick up blokes who really perform on the park, rather than names. Blokes like Kieran McGuinness and... gulp... Ian Callinan.

Great news for the NFC and its future, if anything like the numbers being talked about, are true. Kudos to all of those involved.


It's amazing the fillip a top former player gives to an SANFL club. The leadership they provide alone is gold. Not to mention the contacts for possible recruits as well as the extra credibility they give to the club from an interstater's point of view.
Grahaml
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4812
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:59 am
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 169 times

Postby smac » Sat May 19, 2007 7:41 am

BPBRB wrote:
doggies4eva wrote:
BPBRB wrote:
Dogwatcher wrote:I think its terraces could certainly be tidied up.
Maybe a more formal standing area near the bars (might alleviate issues between drinkers).
Move the BBQ from in front of the grandstand - looks terrible and there's food services area behind anyway. Would make more room.
Walkways around the oval could be a little better and less cluttered. Something could also be down with the lighting tower on the eastern side (at ground level - it looks terrible with all of that barbed wire around it). An advertiser or club sponsor could get very good value out of that tower and it would be less of an eyesore.

Please don't think this is an attack on your club. I just think the ammenities for spectators in the outer could be a little better.


I agree with your points dw but there are other grounds that need improvements on various degrees. Prospect from my point of view does need lot's of improvement but all going well with negotiations with the Council it shouldn't be too far away that money gets spent and the facilities as far as spectators go will be improved signifanctly as well as a good old clean up and face lift.

Elizabeth is hardly a "jewel in the crown" as far as facilities go so I would be keen to hear your thoughts on what needs doing out there?


The Council promised to build another grandstand when the club first made the finals. That was 1971 and we are still waiting.


I think you hit the nail on the head as most clubs have council issues etc to get around and I know North are reluctant to pour money into what is essentially someone else's asset. If we other clubs could just have the 99 year @ 1 dollar deal South got but not every club has the Premier as a Supporter :roll: .

If North were smarter then they could have done a deal with Bannon when he was premier years ago - a bit more "lost money" in the State Bank fiasco would not have been noticed!
The club certainly hasn't been sitting back waiting on council to help though - they are doing stuff themselves to keep progressing toward the objective (world domination I believe :lol: ). New canteen/bbq, 2 upgraded kiosks, player facilities upgrade (which continues) and considerable work on maintenance of the whole complex.

I think the key is a cooperative relationship with the council that the concil also enjoy. This makes the club more likely to spend their own cash at times rather than 'dig the heals in' as appears to be the case with North. It's a shame as the facilities at North could be upgraded to a level that would stop all bitching for a reasonably low cost (can't speak for player facilities, haven't been under the stand to the change rooms for many years). Kiosk/bar upgrades/building are reasonably low cost, as would be fixing the dunnies.
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Postby Squawk » Sun May 20, 2007 1:56 am

A few points:

Norwood u/17s have trained at Golden Grove for 3 or so years now - so work is going in to that area.
The new pokies venue at Gilles Plains is a commercial venture rather than a "Norwood Football Club" expansion away from the Parade.
HBT and SMAC have correctly pointed out a number of improvements that have occurred recently. Also, aluminium bleachers from footy park are being installed at the Northern end at the moment.
The eastern light tower does have sponsorship signs - BigStar for one.
As for the shithouses, they could certainly be improved but seriously Centurion, if you go to the footy and need a Thomas Crapper you need to stop having baked beans for breaky on a Saturday morning! Lets not forget the ladies needs tho...
All up I think our ground is pretty good in service terms with a lot of options for food/drink all the way around the ground. At other grounds these services are pretty much limited to the grandstand sides.
Steve Bradbury and Michael Milton. Aussie Legends.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRnztSjUB2U
User avatar
Squawk
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4665
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 3:00 pm
Location: Coopers Stadium
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 3 times

Postby BPBRB » Sun May 20, 2007 4:34 pm

Squawk wrote:A few points:

Norwood u/17s have trained at Golden Grove for 3 or so years now - so work is going in to that area.
The new pokies venue at Gilles Plains is a commercial venture rather than a "Norwood Football Club" expansion away from the Parade.
HBT and SMAC have correctly pointed out a number of improvements that have occurred recently. Also, aluminium bleachers from footy park are being installed at the Northern end at the moment.
The eastern light tower does have sponsorship signs - BigStar for one.
As for the shithouses, they could certainly be improved but seriously Centurion, if you go to the footy and need a Thomas Crapper you need to stop having baked beans for breaky on a Saturday morning! Lets not forget the ladies needs tho...
All up I think our ground is pretty good in service terms with a lot of options for food/drink all the way around the ground. At other grounds these services are pretty much limited to the grandstand sides.


Good summary squawk and I agree the catering at Norwood is very good interms of being right around the ground. Now if they would only sell Bundy cans at the bars!
BPBRB
 

Postby SDK » Sun May 20, 2007 10:52 pm

The Council refused to fund the Southern Stand renovation and other problems were apparent.
But the main reason this did not go ahead was the members stood up and said no !!!! To move the pokies a matter of metres where they failed to attract custom and spend millions to do it was financial suicide. The Norwood Parade is saturated with pokies....thank God we stopped that disaster.
Now the wheel has turned and hopefully we have a good money maker like Wedgies mob.
The days of building grandeose clubrooms used 9 times a year are gone...the expenditure does not produce enough income. I would love to see the eyesore RSL Club developed.....a joint venture as a watering hole. A bit like Woodville...watching the football as you have a few jars.
Anyway we are on the way again so look out !
SDK
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2384
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 5:03 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 51 times

Postby topsywaldron » Sun May 20, 2007 10:58 pm

SDK wrote:But the main reason this did not go ahead was the members stood up and said no !!!!


At least that board put themselves up for election every so often.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 218 times

Postby mal » Thu May 24, 2007 10:53 pm

This might be right :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?:

NORWOOD COMMUNITY CLUB

PURCHASED FOR$900,000
SOLD FOR..........$5.4 MILLION
PROFIT...............$4.5 MILLION
:?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?:
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 30202
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2107 times
Been liked: 2134 times

Postby JK » Fri May 25, 2007 12:50 pm

mal wrote:This might be right :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?:

NORWOOD COMMUNITY CLUB

PURCHASED FOR$900,000
SOLD FOR..........$5.4 MILLION
PROFIT...............$4.5 MILLION
:?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?:


Wouldn't think thats too far off the mark Malcolm
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Postby doggies4eva » Fri May 25, 2007 2:05 pm

This thread makes me recall a radio interview I heard recently. It was with the CEO of the Melbourne Football Club. He said that he key responsibility was to run an effective business, to make sure that there was adequate cashflow and long term viability. When he was asked where did on-ground performance fit in to that he said that it would take care of itself - or his football manager would but his objective was just to provide the budget and financial framework to that it was posssible to field a competitive team.

Norwood now have the ability to re-structure themselves. I hope for their sake that they do it with a similar philosophy to that as stated above.
We used to be good :-(
User avatar
doggies4eva
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: In front of a computer screen
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |