
by brent » Sat Jun 23, 2007 5:39 pm
by stampy » Sat Jun 23, 2007 6:11 pm
by NFC » Sat Jun 23, 2007 6:14 pm
brent wrote:mitchell at 60 meters, just had to score......
by WRxb0y » Sat Jun 23, 2007 6:17 pm
by Macca19 » Sat Jun 23, 2007 9:01 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Jun 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by smithy » Sat Jun 23, 2007 10:25 pm
by Pseudo » Sat Jun 23, 2007 10:44 pm
by Macca19 » Sat Jun 23, 2007 10:51 pm
Wedgie wrote:Giniver's decision to drop Hargs cost them a point, be interesting to see how it pans out.
by RustyCage » Sat Jun 23, 2007 11:07 pm
Wedgie wrote:Im not sure how long a proud club like Port will keep accepting mediocrity.
by Cambridge Clarrie » Sat Jun 23, 2007 11:08 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Jun 23, 2007 11:09 pm
Macca19 wrote:Wedgie wrote:Giniver's decision to drop Hargs cost them a point, be interesting to see how it pans out.
How do you come to that conclusion?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by power01 » Sat Jun 23, 2007 11:12 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Jun 23, 2007 11:13 pm
power01 wrote:Harg's i shake my head what the Maggies see in him is beyond me.....sure the guys has done good things as a Rooster, but hes carrying weight, injury prone and long in the tooth........has been at best...................
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by RustyCage » Sat Jun 23, 2007 11:15 pm
Wedgie wrote:Macca19 wrote:Wedgie wrote:Giniver's decision to drop Hargs cost them a point, be interesting to see how it pans out.
How do you come to that conclusion?
Win = 2 pts
Draw = 1 pt
2 - 1 = 1
Simple mathetmatics really, even for a Port supporter I would have thought?
by power01 » Sat Jun 23, 2007 11:16 pm
Wedgie wrote:power01 wrote:Harg's i shake my head what the Maggies see in him is beyond me.....sure the guys has done good things as a Rooster, but hes carrying weight, injury prone and long in the tooth........has been at best...................
2 - 1 = 1
Its not that hard to work out, is it?
by Wedgie » Sat Jun 23, 2007 11:20 pm
pafc1870 wrote:Funny stuff there politician Wedgie, now answer the question!!
How would us having Hargs in the team today have ensured we won the game? At least Clive lead for the ball and made a contest, which is something Hargs didn't do in the last couple of weeks. There were times where there would be a pack contest last week and Hargs wouldn't even raise his arms up. No sane person who saw Hargs lack of effort in the last few weeks could question his demotion to the reserves this week. And I put Harry Miller in that category too.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by RustyCage » Sat Jun 23, 2007 11:27 pm
Wedgie wrote:pafc1870 wrote:Funny stuff there politician Wedgie, now answer the question!!
How would us having Hargs in the team today have ensured we won the game? At least Clive lead for the ball and made a contest, which is something Hargs didn't do in the last couple of weeks. There were times where there would be a pack contest last week and Hargs wouldn't even raise his arms up. No sane person who saw Hargs lack of effort in the last few weeks could question his demotion to the reserves this week. And I put Harry Miller in that category too.
Anyone with half a brain has seen that besides Rd 1 that Port play their best footy and are a 10 goal better side than normal with Hargs and Waterhouse together.
Draw + 60 pts = 60 pt victory
And that doesn't even take into account Harg's record against the Bays which is better than most other teams.
I was hoping Port would do well this year but will laugh my tits off if the 1 pt from this game costs them a finals spot.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |