WEED NOT APPOINTED FOR 2008

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: WEED NOT APPOINTED FOR 2008

Postby MST » Fri Jul 20, 2007 5:03 pm

Constance_Perm wrote:
MST wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote:
redden whites wrote:How did he get the job in the first place!Most ridiculous appointment since McIntosh to a league coaching role.


What a crock of shit


People seem to forget 'Macca' took Norwood to a preliminary final in his first season at the helm (2002) before losing to eventual Premier, Sturt.

His minor round record that year was 15-5 (from memory) and included two victories over Central District, including one at Elizabeth.

Plenty of experts on here of course CP.


I think the record might have even been better than that? (Spelly?)

In the years to follow he lost somewhere between 10-20 senior regulars to retirement and the $$ lure of amateur leagues ... He was never afforded the $$ to purchase top flight players from interstate and thus threw all his energies into the kids, many of which are still at the club and look to have a future.

Anyway good luck to the Weed, he is a champion bloke and I hope he finishes the season out well with Westies and gets another opportunity to coach at league level again somewhere down the track.


Pretty sure it was 15-5. I know Sturt went 16-4 (3 losses to Central and an upset loss on a wet Friday night at AO to Norwood :wink:)

I think the 'Dogs went 18-2, with their only losses both to Norwood.

No team outside the top three tasted victory over Central, Sturt or Norwood, although WWT went within a solitary point of knocking off Norwood in the major round.

History now I guess.

[*]Does this qualify as a thread hijacking?
Last edited by MST on Fri Jul 20, 2007 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
MST
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: The Home of Football, Unley Oval
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: WEED NOT APPOINTED FOR 2008

Postby Footy Chick » Fri Jul 20, 2007 5:04 pm

kookas wrote:
Falcon Chick wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if Macca is approached to coach Westies next year (and NO, this isn't an official statement)


I would be surprised if he would be interested inthe job. Stop pushing up his case.


i didnt say he'd be interested (well I hope not), but with his recent successes he Westies may see him as a contender..
Don't play games with a girl who can play 'em better...

Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
User avatar
Footy Chick
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 26904
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:44 pm
Location: anywhere I want to be...
Has liked: 1767 times
Been liked: 2191 times

Re: WEED NOT APPOINTED FOR 2008

Postby Bluedemon » Fri Jul 20, 2007 5:22 pm

Falcon Chick wrote:
kookas wrote:
Falcon Chick wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if Macca is approached to coach Westies next year (and NO, this isn't an official statement)


I would be surprised if he would be interested inthe job. Stop pushing up his case.


i didnt say he'd be interested (well I hope not), but with his recent successes he Westies may see him as a contender..

:wink:
SAFooty.net, where you hear the community football news first
User avatar
Bluedemon
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4958
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 1:30 pm
Location: Goodwood
Has liked: 135 times
Been liked: 106 times

Re: WEED NOT APPOINTED FOR 2008

Postby dash61 » Fri Jul 20, 2007 6:16 pm

So the early nominations are

1 Luke Norman
2 Broadie Atkinson
3 Garry McIntosh :shock: :shock: :shock:

Lets say it will be advertised nationally in the next 7-10 days, as a Westies supporter, "Who would i like?????, someone from outside the state with no pre concieved idea's and given authority to remove any players etc who he considers not part of his plan.

My wish, Maybe a Barry Mitchell, but i dont think we could afford someone who is probably on a $100k contract at present.
dash61
 

Re: WEED NOT APPOINTED FOR 2008

Postby MST » Fri Jul 20, 2007 6:23 pm

dash61 wrote:So the early nominations are

1 Luke Norman
2 Broadie Atkinson
3 Garry McIntosh :shock: :shock: :shock:

Lets say it will be advertised nationally in the next 7-10 days, as a Westies supporter, "Who would i like?????, someone from outside the state with no pre concieved idea's and given authority to remove any players etc who he considers not part of his plan.

My wish, Maybe a Barry Mitchell, but i dont think we could afford someone who is probably on a $100k contract at present.


From an opposition supporters point of view, I would be very surprised if they appointed from within as they did with Wayne, so for me that would rule Brodie and Aishy out.

Luke Norman would be certain to apply and would have to be a show.
MST
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: The Home of Football, Unley Oval
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: WEED NOT APPOINTED FOR 2008

Postby spell_check » Fri Jul 20, 2007 6:35 pm

Central were 18-2 in the Minor Round in 2002, Norwood was 17-3 and Sturt 16-4. Centrals only losses was to Norwood; Norwood lost to Sturt twice, and West once. That was the only loss to a team outside the top three that year by either team. And Sturt lost three times to Central and once to Norwood.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Re: WEED NOT APPOINTED FOR 2008

Postby Wedgie » Fri Jul 20, 2007 6:44 pm

If Brodie Atkinson gets the job then then bloodntars.com will be coming down! :twisted:
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: WEED NOT APPOINTED FOR 2008

Postby Dan The Man » Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:26 pm

At the end of the day there just isn't enough quality players at Westies. If Roy Laird was coaching Westies would they have done much better ? I doubt it !
If the Weed was coaching Central would they still be on top ? More than likely !
Dan The Man
Member
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 2:05 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: WEED NOT APPOINTED FOR 2008

Postby am Bays » Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:40 pm

redandblack wrote:
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:*phwoooo* as Coorong aka the Duke blows the smoke from his .45....

First Doug, now the Weed, whose next Coorong on your single minded quest to Purge all on your hit list...???


Easier to write who's not on his hit list :D


Where the hell is He (Coorong) ????

Still getting the blood off his hands.....

Or sharpening the knives for the next victim on his list....
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19753
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2126 times

Re: WEED NOT APPOINTED FOR 2008

Postby Coorong » Sat Jul 21, 2007 7:19 am

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:
redandblack wrote:
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:*phwoooo* as Coorong aka the Duke blows the smoke from his .45....

First Doug, now the Weed, whose next Coorong on your single minded quest to Purge all on your hit list...???


Easier to write who's not on his hit list :D


Where the hell is He (Coorong) ????

Still getting the blood off his hands.....

Or sharpening the knives for the next victim on his list....


I am here, watching and reading. I make five observations

1. if at the start of the season we had swapped weed with Laird, Dogs would probably be about 3rd or 4th on the list and West would be around 5th or 6th

2. We dont actually have a "bad" list. Quite a few are quality players, but for "some" reason dont relate to the coach. I did hear once that his message to the playing group was confusing to anyone listening

3. Personally I dont think any of the assistants are up to it (as our ladder position indicates) and would be surprised if they nominated or were interviewed. We will go national and if it comes down to a Barry Mtchell type wanting $100k then such a candidate (if he has ability) will be appointed.

4. My statement on the Westies site last Saturday that weed had coached his last game and that the CEO Damian Phillips would coach for the balance of 2007 may still be the play. We have the bye this week and lots of discussions are "probably" going on behind closed doors

5. The "list" of players, coaches, officials and onfield support will be much different for 2008 (and rightly so) we are old and stale at the moment. But this will change (and has to) I was told last year that we were aiming at 2008 for our "re-birth" and I chastised my informant. However in hindsight he was right and the business plan developed was the right one.
I hate the phrase to enjoy the glory, first you must suffer the pain, and this year is much worse than predicted, but we will recover, surprise and once again be a feared competitor in the years ahead.
User avatar
Coorong
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1524
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:48 am
Location: In the Coaches Box
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 8 times

Re: WEED NOT APPOINTED FOR 2008

Postby am Bays » Sat Jul 21, 2007 8:47 am

Coorong wrote:4. My statement on the Westies site last Saturday that weed had coached his last game and that the CEO Damian Phillips would coach for the balance of 2007 may still be the play. We have the bye this week and lots of discussions are "probably" going on behind closed doors



This is a genuine question not a troll...

The question that has been in my mind since Phillips was appointed is how long is he going to stay????

The professional sport industry is very transient and opportunities are always arising particualrly where sports are based (in this case Melbourne) I honestly can't see him staying longer than 3-5 years (most likely 3 before an opportunity arises at an AFL club or at Football Victoria) and he is back home...

I could be wrong but the experience SANFL clubs have had inopicking young ambitious Victorian coaches (Clarkson Noble) could well be repeaed by clubs picking young ambitious administrators...

And like coaching chopping and changing coaches chopping and changing adminsitration is problematic for the ongoing succes of sporting organisations...
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19753
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2126 times

Re: WEED NOT APPOINTED FOR 2008

Postby bosvit » Sat Jul 21, 2007 9:29 am

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:
Coorong wrote:4. My statement on the Westies site last Saturday that weed had coached his last game and that the CEO Damian Phillips would coach for the balance of 2007 may still be the play. We have the bye this week and lots of discussions are "probably" going on behind closed doors



This is a genuine question not a troll...

The question that has been in my mind since Phillips was appointed is how long is he going to stay????

The professional sport industry is very transient and opportunities are always arising particualrly where sports are based (in this case Melbourne) I honestly can't see him staying longer than 3-5 years (most likely 3 before an opportunity arises at an AFL club or at Football Victoria) and he is back home...

I could be wrong but the experience SANFL clubs have had inopicking young ambitious Victorian coaches (Clarkson Noble) could well be repeaed by clubs picking young ambitious administrators...

And like coaching chopping and changing coaches chopping and changing adminsitration is problematic for the ongoing succes of sporting organisations...

Yeah but we have only had 2 CEO's in about 200 years...... :lol: :lol: :lol:
Never argue with an idiot, those watching may not be able to tell the difference
User avatar
bosvit
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 2:49 pm
Location: Port Lincoln
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: WEED NOT APPOINTED FOR 2008

Postby Thiele » Sat Jul 21, 2007 9:34 am

Looks like my job is a for grabs :(
James Ezard Joint 2009 Magarey Medalist

Personal views only not views of the West Adelaide Footy Club or Bedford Indstries
User avatar
Thiele
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28406
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: The wolf packs den
Has liked: 183 times
Been liked: 118 times

Re: WEED NOT APPOINTED FOR 2008

Postby Dutchy » Sat Jul 21, 2007 9:35 am

Thiele wrote:Looks like my job is a for grabs :(


what role do you take down there Thiele?
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46252
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2648 times
Been liked: 4315 times

Re: WEED NOT APPOINTED FOR 2008

Postby Thiele » Sat Jul 21, 2007 9:36 am

Drinks steward for league and reserves
James Ezard Joint 2009 Magarey Medalist

Personal views only not views of the West Adelaide Footy Club or Bedford Indstries
User avatar
Thiele
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28406
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: The wolf packs den
Has liked: 183 times
Been liked: 118 times

Re: WEED NOT APPOINTED FOR 2008

Postby bosvit » Sat Jul 21, 2007 9:41 am

But seriously I think WAFC need someone who is that ambitious that they want to go to AFL as an administrator.

If Damien was not good enough to go to that level he is probably not good enough to turn the runaway ship that WAFC is around.

If he stays for 3 years and heads us in the right direction before he moves on (if he moves on) he has been worth every penny. IMO that would allow a life long club man etc to take over and keep it all on track.

Same with the coach. It is going to take some one with more than just a good football coaching brain, we need an AFL coaching mind set at WAFC. By that I mean some one who regards the psyche and attitude of the players as his responsibility and just as if not more important to the future of the club than the style of play he is bringing with him.

There is an inherent problem at WAFC when it comes to the mental approach of the player, I dont mean this in a derogatory way at all and I am sure that the players are less aware of it than the spectators.

It is going to be a monumental job for someone to come in and change this culture and IMO this is the number one enemy of the Bloods and we need to find a coach that can smash it out of us, and that includes the spectators IMO. So we may just have to keep changing coaches every 2-3 years until we find the right one.

I realise this has not worked all that well at the bay since the early 90s but what else can you do?

The other thing we lack as much as anything else is on field leadership, wheres Luke Norman when you need him :D
Never argue with an idiot, those watching may not be able to tell the difference
User avatar
bosvit
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 2:49 pm
Location: Port Lincoln
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: WEED NOT APPOINTED FOR 2008

Postby Coorong » Sat Jul 21, 2007 9:53 am

You may have heard the phrase planned succession at other companies and clubs. Was a phrase outlawed at WAFC, but is now very much part of our persona
User avatar
Coorong
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1524
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:48 am
Location: In the Coaches Box
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 8 times

Re: WEED NOT APPOINTED FOR 2008

Postby redandblack » Sat Jul 21, 2007 9:54 am

Coorong, your 'informant' has had the worst track record of anyone on here, so i would suggest you give him or her the flick :D

The thought that Damien Phillips will coach us this season is totally bizarre. You've predicted Weed's immediate demise at least three times, including last year and it eventually happened at about the time most people at Westies thought it would. Your further prediction that the assistants would all go last week was also never going to happen.

A moment's serious analysis of the Centrals list and the West list would also show your statement about Weed and Laird to be nonsense. Which West players would make Centrals team and who would they replace? I'd invite Centrals fans to answer that too. It won't take long.

How about giving a moment's thought to some serious analysis instead of just regurgitating silly rumours fed to you from someone at Westies who thinks they know what's going on, but doesn't.

I would be interested in your serious thoughts about our playing list and future prospects.
redandblack
 

Re: WEED NOT APPOINTED FOR 2008

Postby Hondo » Sat Jul 21, 2007 10:25 am

Coorong wrote:1. if at the start of the season we had swapped weed with Laird, Dogs would probably be about 3rd or 4th on the list and West would be around 5th or 6th


There'd possibly be some improvement in Westies and a drop off in Centrals but 3 places change either is way TOO big a call IMHO
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: WEED NOT APPOINTED FOR 2008

Postby MST » Sat Jul 21, 2007 10:47 am

spell_check wrote:Central were 18-2 in the Minor Round in 2002, Norwood was 17-3 and Sturt 16-4. Centrals only losses was to Norwood; Norwood lost to Sturt twice, and West once. That was the only loss to a team outside the top three that year by either team. And Sturt lost three times to Central and once to Norwood.


Cheers Spelly.
MST
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: The Home of Football, Unley Oval
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |