kickinit wrote:therisingblues wrote:A few pages back someone was pretty smug thinking the SANFL would die without Port. Now it's been pointed out that's not the case, that same someone seems to think it's not fair!
Well excuse us for not rolling over and quietly dying.
I'll still follow Sturt, same as I have my whole life. If that's a crime against the Power they can just go fet gucked. I just can't understand the number of their supporters who believe the SANFL is theirs to kick around as they wish, and further to that, are upset because we are not letting them.
Keep alienating thecrest of SA like they are and they'll never attract new fans.
See the problem with some people is that they just want to have a crack at port. like i've said in previous post this is not just a port issue it is also a issue with the crows. It has even got to the point of the crows asking David Koch for his help because of his finance experience. Do you really think if this wasn't a issue then the crows would be doing that? So in future if your going to have a go make sure you include everything, which means in this case you would also have to have a crack at the crows.
there is a slight difference, the Crows could of stayed at footy park and survived for many many years to come, on the other hand Port Power NEEDED the SANFL to ALLOW it to play games at AO to have any chance of survival by hopefully increasing its DISMALL crowd attendances despite the ground being closer to its heartland than AO