SA Footy • View topic

by **Apachebulldog** » Fri Apr 14, 2006 5:01 pm

The Maggies should double they will be coming outta the woodwork after 2 wins !!

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF !!!!

by **westside** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:21 pm

Glenelg: 1,276
North: 2,174
Norwood: 2,247
Port: 1,992
West: 940
Eagles: 1,707

Anybody have figures for Sturt, South and Central?

by **drebin** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:53 pm

Big drop off for Port his year given the last post re figures? You would think with them being a hot flag favourite they would be jumping on board - as they no doubt will after the Power's season "implodes" over the next few weeks. Can't wait to see all that teal at the SANFL again! :roll:

P.S. West will stop at 1000 as that is what their website says every year!

by **Jimmy** » Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:19 am

Sturts info is TOP SECRET.

Website · by **TroyGFC** » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:54 am

Big drop off for Port his year given the last post re figures? You would think with them being a hot flag favourite they would be jumping on board - as they no doubt will after the Power's season "implodes" over the next few weeks. Can't wait to see all that teal at the SANFL again!

Ports membership will drop off this year because they arent offering money back if they dont make the five.

by **Ian** » Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:06 am

Can anyone confirm who is included in each clubs official membership numbers. I know some include honorary & /or life members.

North's is paid members only.

by **westside** » Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:15 pm

drebin wrote:Big drop off for Port his year given the last post re figures? You would think with them being a hot flag favourite they would be jumping on board - as they no doubt will after the Power's season "implodes" over the next few weeks. Can't wait to see all that teal at the SANFL again!
P.S. West will stop at 1000 as that is what their website says every year!

The Port figure is an out of date one.

by **doggies4eva** » Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:17 pm

Jimmy wrote:Sturts info is TOP SECRET.

Is that another way of saying embarrasingly low?

by **westside** » Wed Apr 19, 2006 3:15 pm

doggies4eva wrote:
Jimmy wrote:Sturts info is TOP SECRET.

Is that another way of saying embarrasingly low?

Central's is top secret as well.

by **doggies4eva** » Wed Apr 19, 2006 3:24 pm

wide receiver wrote:
doggies4eva wrote:
Jimmy wrote:Sturts info is TOP SECRET.

Is that another way of saying embarrasingly low?

Central's is top secret as well.

I've been trying to find it out. When I do I'll post it. They are hoping to top 3,000.

by **drebin** » Wed Apr 19, 2006 3:40 pm

doggies4eva wrote:
wide receiver wrote:
doggies4eva wrote:
Jimmy wrote:Sturts info is TOP SECRET.

Is that another way of saying embarrasingly low?

Central's is top secret as well.

I've been trying to find it out. When I do I'll post it. They are hoping to top 3,000.

Most would have "topped" themselves after last Saturdays result! :lol:

by **doggies4eva** » Wed Apr 19, 2006 4:01 pm

drebin wrote:
doggies4eva wrote:
wide receiver wrote:
doggies4eva wrote:
Jimmy wrote:Sturts info is TOP SECRET.

Is that another way of saying embarrasingly low?

Central's is top secret as well.

I've been trying to find it out. When I do I'll post it. They are hoping to top 3,000.

Most would have "topped" themselves after last Saturdays result!

We are all disappointed but haven't given up. Remember last year :!:

by **drebin** » Wed Apr 19, 2006 5:02 pm

Well I am definately not writing them off (or any team for that matter). The comp so far is looking likely to be very even which overall is good for the SANFL.

by **doggies4eva** » Wed Apr 19, 2006 5:18 pm

drebin wrote:Well I am definately not writing them off (or any team for that matter). The comp so far is looking likely to be very even which overall is good for the SANFL.

Agreed.

by **am Bays** » Tue May 02, 2006 12:10 pm

Bays up to 1352 another 70 odd members signed up in last two weeks. That wagons getting bigger!!!

Rumour has it that a couple of the Grog Squad were signed up as they commandered our membership sign on "tent" on Sunday but we surruptiously got their debit details so welcome to the family Punky, Wedgie, Drebs..... :lol:

Hey your chances of being on the winning side when Glenelg play North in a GF have just gone from 25% to 75%!!!!!

by **PACS** » Wed May 03, 2006 12:33 am

Ports membership is 2,372

GO THE PORT ADELAIDE MAGPIES AND PORT ADELAIDE POWER

by **Punk Rooster** » Wed May 03, 2006 8:24 am

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Bays up to 1352 another 70 odd members signed up in last two weeks. That wagons getting bigger!!!

Rumour has it that a couple of the Grog Squad were signed up as they commandered our membership sign on "tent" on Sunday but we surruptiously got their debit details so welcome to the family Punky, Wedgie, Drebs.....

Hey your chances of being on the winning side when Glenelg play North in a GF have just gone from 25% to 75%!!!!!

SO (in theory) if we supported both North & Glenelg(never happen in a million years), & they both played off in a GF, we'd only have a 75% chance of winning?

I'm no Rocket Scientist, but I would've tought it'd be a 100%?
Anyway, we were converting all reasonable looking women Bay supporters to North in my tent*

by **Wedgie** » Wed May 03, 2006 8:40 am

Punk Rooster wrote:
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Bays up to 1352 another 70 odd members signed up in last two weeks. That wagons getting bigger!!!

Rumour has it that a couple of the Grog Squad were signed up as they commandered our membership sign on "tent" on Sunday but we surruptiously got their debit details so welcome to the family Punky, Wedgie, Drebs.....

Hey your chances of being on the winning side when Glenelg play North in a GF have just gone from 25% to 75%!!!!!
SO (in theory) if we supported both North & Glenelg(never happen in a million years), & they both played off in a GF, we'd only have a 75% chance of winning? I'm no Rocket Scientist, but I would've tought it'd be a 100%?
Anyway, we were converting all reasonable looking women Bay supporters to North in my tent*

I thought he was saying {jokingly} that the Grog Squad had signed up as Glenelg members (as opposed to being North members) therefore they'd be more likely to support a winning team in a GF between North and Glenelg as Glenelg have won 75% of the clashes between those 2 sides?